Why not the 30-06?

I think the answer to the original post is “the factory ammo you can buy at the store kicks like a mule and is overkill for white tailed deer. And most fellas don’t handload.”

Having thinned down my collection, I can tell you that my Grandpa’s Remington Express 30-06 was the rifle I kept. My Grandpa was in WWI, and that’s what he trained on. When he got back, thousands of those rifles were sporterized and could be bought for very low cost.

I sold the Savage (300 savage, goofy fitting stock but pretty) and I do regret selling my 30-30s, which is what I used for big Wisconsin white tails. Even considered “little” I found 30-30 plenty effective in Wisconsin and far less bruising to my shoulder. Grandpa’s ‘06 has a steel butt plate, and by God it’s gonna stay that way. Mostly I hunt deer with handguns.

Handoading, I’ve got 30 cal little 100 grain plinkers you can load for 900 fps, fancy plastic balistic tips that mushroom perfectly at very low velocity so pick your trajectory and kick, and boxes of factory ammo in case of T-Rex invasion or elk or moose.

It’s like a hammer from the gods on Bambi and on your shoulder, unless you hand load.

It’s the grand master of North America hunting.

Let’s face it, no one is going to make a lot of money selling 30-06’s because once you have one, you don’t really need anything else. Unless you go on safari.

You could almost say the same about the 30-30.

Say you have a .22, a Marlin 30-30, a Remington 30-06 a set of loading dies and a Wingmaster 12 gauge. What can’t you hunt? What are factories going to make to give to gun writers so we shell out our cash for the latest and greatest?

I mean, I guess you could put a blue-tooth scope attached to your smart phone and laser range finder so you can order a pizza while shooting 600 yards at Bambi.. meh. I have no interest in that.

In true fact, 30-06 is the last rifle I kept. I overdid it... I need a .22. They make some nice little bolt action .22s these days.
 
I think a better question would be why consider anything other than a 30-06?
Not hunting anything larger than deer, Lighter recoil, less meat damage if front shoulder hit, etc. 7x57, 7MM-08, 300 Savage, .308 Win., .260 Rem, .243, 250 Savage, 257 Roberts, 30-30 Winchester, etc., etc.

A 30-06 (in my opinion) is unnecessarily stout for the exclusive use on Whitetails here in Michigan, especially considering most deer here are shot a close range.
 
For this old guy 30-06 for anything and at brush areas 45-70 they do it all I think. Small game my 870 shotgun and a 22 lr. Everything a hunter needs for anything I think
 
OK, I give up. Why not? It has been one of the top cartridges in sales for the past 50 years, it is accurate, powerful, and common. That's probably the reason nobody is singing its song anymore, there are newer and sexier things nowadays, no need to get another 30-06. Hows about the new 6.5 Whatchamacallit? Or a 338 Superboom? Haha! Guaranteed to detach a retina in 10 shots or so. No, everybody is trying to sell something new, the same old same old just isn't fun to talk about.
I think bullet technology is the real reason the 06 is not as popular as it once was. I am doing most things today with a .243 and .257 that I used to feel I needed a .30 to handle. I also found that the light recoil is nice on the old reconstructed shoulder.
(I have no idea why the .308 Win is popular. I am no great fan of it.)
 
Last edited:
A 30-06 (in my opinion) is unnecessarily stout for the exclusive use on Whitetails here in Michigan, especially considering most deer here are shot a close range.

Reload and you can adjust the power level of your rifle. And I agree. The 30/06 is a bit much for the small whitetails we have here in Tx. But I have 150gr round nose Remington bullets for the 30-30 that that shoot around 2500-2600fps and and with my gun sighted an inch high at 100 yards with full power loads these land right on the bullseye and are easy on the shoulder to shoot.

To my way of thinking reloading opens up a whole new world of shooting. I can turn down a powerful gun but I can't turn a 243 into a 30-06.

I made some light loads for a 15 year old girl to use on a youth hunt with my 7-08. I think these are a better killer as a 243 and I have the ability to load up to 170gr bullets in the same rifle if I choose to. The 30-06 is all this and more.

Its the caliber that all other rounds are compared to. They are just as good, almost as good, or maybe just a little better than the 30-06. But the original is just as good now as it ever was. And sometimes with new loads and bullets just a little better.
 
Loading for the '06 is fun. A round 00 Buck and five grains of pistol powder = squirrel load. Or an 80-grain bullet for the destruction of jackrabbits. Then the plinker load of the 169-grain lead gas check bullet ahead of 20 grains of 2400. After that, the "get serious" deer/elk/moose loads.

What's not to like? :D
 
To my way of thinking reloading opens up a whole new world of shooting. I can turn down a powerful gun but I can't turn a 243 into a 30-06.
Most people who haunt gun forums own many guns...we have the luxury of choosing a gun that fits a particular niche instead of make-one-gun-do-everything...so that fact that it can be hand loaded for a particular purpose is a moot point when one has a closet full of guns.
 
To my way of thinking reloading opens up a whole new world of shooting. I can turn down a powerful gun but I can't turn a 243 into a 30-06.
By the same token, I can turn down my 300 RUM, but you can't turn up your .30-06. Everybody has a reason for liking what they like. I have 2 .30-06 and like them both. Have not shot either one in over 25 years. But I like them.
 
Shame on you. It obligatory at least once a year to go shoot that Icon!

I was chastised for not doing so with the Family 06 this last year and rightfully so.

Ending of WWI was a time to do so. Bad boy, no biscuit (from a long ago commercial about a dog that did not do it right)
 
I worked with a man years back and he guided deer and elk hunts on his families land that goes back a long way. he may not still be guiding but his kids and grand kids probably are . He always had story's to tell about clients some of them did not have a rifle and some where not sure of what rifle bring other would show up with several rifles in different calibers not knowing what was needed some where only going because there friend was going and they never shot a gun. any ways he used to tell them don't worry just bring a box of 30-06 150 grain for deer and 180 grain for elk and they could use his rifle . through the years we worked together he also sold a lot of 30-06 rifles.
 
(I have no idea why the .308 Win is popular. I am no great fan of it.)

Lighter recoil, not that much for a 150 gr if any. Supposedly inherent accurate. I got one and finally found a load it seems to like.
 
I really don't understand the recoil issue. To me even a hot loaded 06 with a steel butt plate doesn't have much recoil.:confused::confused::confused:
 
If, as so many people claim, the muzzle velocities of 150-grain bullets are near equal for the .308 and '06, how can the recoils be very much different?

The lesser powder charge of the .308 probably means maybe a 5% reduction in recoil. That's not very much. Can your shoulder tell the difference?
 
I really don't understand the recoil issue. To me even a hot loaded 06 with a steel butt plate doesn't have much recoil.
I beg to differ. Despite the admonition of the training Sgt.s that the M1 did not "kick", it kicked the living heck out of me. We had a course of fire at Fort Knox called, "Trainfire" consisting of human shaped silhouettes that would pop-up at random distances after a horn sounded. A hit would knock the silhouette down and you would be scored with a hit. Long story short, when I first started out firing I hit nearly every target no matter what distance (you had to quickly estimate the distance and fire before the target dropped out of sight), they were. I was easily shooting in the expert class. However, as the shooting went on, I got so beat-up from the recoil I began to miss some of the targets. In the end, I qualified as a "Sharpshooter"...five hits from obtaining the top score of "Expert".

Also, some years ago I fired my M1 in NRA local service rifle matches taking home third place in as many matches...beating several of the guys who traveled to out of state matches to compete. Then, I bought a Colt H-Bar to shoot in the matches. The very first match in which I competed, I shot the highest score I had ever fired...High Master. I would have taken a first in that match except for the fact that some damned "kid"...a rifle instructor for the National Guard had been competing in that match and beat me.

I attribute the difference between my shooting the M1 and the Colt H-bar .223, was the recoil...30-06's have always kicked the hell out of me and it was evident in my shooting.
 
If, as so many people claim, the muzzle velocities of 150-grain bullets are near equal for the .308 and '06, how can the recoils be very much different?
My .308 Winchester Model 70 (150 grain) kicked the hell out of me also, as did a couple of 30-06s (150-155 grain) I owned. I don't know where you guys get this "light recoiling stuff." In other words, they aren't different.

If it is a matter of some of us being more sensitive to recoil than others, that may be true...but it is a physical thing, not psychological. I had a Browning BT-99 trap gun that had a weighted buttstock, a recoil pad, a long barrel, and a integral muzzle break...things that were all intended to reduce felt recoil. If I fired four rounds of trap (25 x 4 = 100 rounds), I would end up with a painful dull ache in my right shoulder that would last until the next day...that was NOT psychological...that was a physical ache.
 
Last edited:
My .308 Winchester Model 70 (150 grain) kicked the hell out of me also, as did a couple of 30-06s (150-155 grain) I owned. I don't know where you guys get this "light recoiling stuff." In other words, they aren't different.

If it is a matter of some of us being more sensitive to recoil than others, that may be true...but it is a physical thing, not psychological. I had a Browning BT-99 trap gun that had a weighted buttstock, a recoil pad, a long barrel, and a integral muzzle break...things that were all intended to reduce felt recoil. If I fired four rounds of trap (25 x 4 = 100 rounds), I would end up with a painful dull ache in my right shoulder that would last until the next day...that was NOT psychological...that was a physical ache.
Stock design, rifle weight, barrel length, etc will effect the difference in recoil between the two. I have a Marlin 336 30-30 with a straight stock and 20" barrel and although the 30-30 is known for it's light recoil this particular carbine has a noticeable punch to it. About like my 30-06 rifles :)
 
For me, the difference was that 308 is just a little bit cheaper than 30-06 when I've shopped around. I don't do any long distance shooting, was mainly just looking for more power than my 223 so the 308 just made more sense. My father in law wants a 30-06 for the extra powder capacity in case he starts reloading and because he just like the tradition behind the round.
 
Back
Top