Question for Daryl
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You say all your guns are reliable. I'll take you at your word.
But I will ask, does this mean you either repair or weed out any gun that ever malfunctions? Or have you been very lucky in your purchases to date?]
(Even reputable makes have been known to hiccup on occasion.)
Yes, I do repair or weed out firearms that are not reliable, and yes, I've had my share of problems with some firearms.
I had a CZ 75b that, no matter what I did to remedy the problem, never once fed an entire magazine of ammo without several failures. Good maker, but a lemon of a firearm. I finally got rid of it.
I had a Springfield "Mirco-compact" .45, a short version of a 1911. Dang nice firearm, except that it kept breaking guide rods loose from the guide rod head. It was in working order when I sold it after having shot less than a box of ammo through it, but I didn't trust it any more. Two guide rod's in less than 50 rounds was unacceptable to me, and I thought about it long and hard before I sold it. It really was a very nice 1911.
I've also had some that needed repair, and afterwards proved to be reliable.
A lowly Taurus snub in .32 H&R mag that I recently aquired had two to three misfires with every cylinder of ammo I loaded into it. After some evaluation and thought, I filed the hammer just a bit so that the transfer bar would put more force on the firing pin. The firing pin was barel sticking out of the frame with the hammer resting on the transfer bar, and I used my (reliable) j-frame for comparison. The hammer, when fired, still rests it's weight on the frame, but enough force is applied to the transfer bar so that the firing pin now protruded from the frame sufficiently to fire the rounds reliably. Problem solved, and I've fired enough ammo through it to insure reliability. In it's current state, I'd carry this revolver without reservation; with it's ported barrel and low recoil chambering, it's a very fast and accurate shooting snub.
I also have a Ruger Vaquero that malfunctioned, although the cause was obviously ammo related. The bullet in a heavy recoiling Cor-Bon .45 Colt cartridge jumped crimp. That's easily solved by running the rest of the box of ammo through a crimp die to put a better crimp on the bullets, and then insuring that bullets are crimped well in my handloads.
The list could go on, but the main point is that you're right; all makers can turn out a firearm that has a problem or three from time to time. None of them, or us are immune to a failure. However, I won't keep a firearm that continually fails, or seems to have some sort of design flaw that renders it unreliable.
So, to get back on topic, reliability is a prerequisite for me keeping a firearm; Once proven reliable, or "made" reliable, I have other reasons for carrying what I carry on any particular day.
I stated earlier that the reason I carried a snub is concealability. There are times when easy concealment is necessary, since I live in southern Az, and it gets somewhat warm here.
And I stated that the reason I carry a G23 is increased firepower. I live about 10-12 miles north of Mexico in an area known for illegal drug and human smuggling. 'Nuff said on that.
Daryl