I think y'all are confusing some issues. Deer do not see the color of orange, but instead likely see it as a shade of gray. So they do see it, but see it differently than we do. They do, in fact, see into the red portion of the spectrum, but not as well. Their vision is skewed to the UV end.
http://www.outdoorlife.com/blogs/big-buck-zone/2014/07/video-new-study-sheds-light-what-deer-see
As red is beyond the yellow portion of the spectrum and orange is between red and yellow, deer do see orange.
Also, deer are keen on seeing movement, even blaze orange movement.
The next time you are sitting in your stand waiting for day light, hold your hand out in front of you and notice how much easier it is to see than the other objects in the woods. Reflected light is what the deer see, whether it be your face, hands or your blaze orange.
Unless looking at a light source, reflected light is what any of us see, that, and the absence of reflected light, just like deer, but they see it better in terms of being more adapted for the dark.
SOLUNAR Tables for terrestrial fauna? There's a bit of witchraft. I have done a good bit of my own testing with Solunar tables and not been able to see where they are predictive of anything for terrestrial game, either deer or hogs. Most of my hog kills would certainly be outside of peak hours according to the tables. I don't think the hogs read the tables.
I am still waiting for the study that both can substantiate that solunar tables (as were developed for fish by Knight in the 20s, published in the 30s) both work for terrestrial fauna and explain why they work, but I have yet to see such a study. All I manage to find are anecdotal stories (like my own, which is contrary) and then hunting writers talking about them.
The same goes for moon phases, approaching storms, passing storms, lucky underwear, and solar flares.