There is no arguing with you because even your own statements are internally inconsistent. Witness your comments regarding the Marine and the photo.
The original story starts here, where Reuters specifically states “... the unit came under fire from Taliban fighters May 18, 2008.”
http://blogs.reuters.com/photo/2008/05/19/close-enough/
Where did the background story on Sgt. Bee come from? Difficult to say, but this source is probably it (no mention of Fox News, but it does mention Reuters).
http://www.the-daily-record.com/news/article/3837211
When I look at the debris cloud, I see an oblong pattern that seems consistent with something striking from right to left. The impact appears to be above and slightly forward of the rifle’s scope, the most visibly obscured part of the first photo. The cloud begins near the front sight of the rifle and stretches nearly to the left edge of the photo. Leaves and branches on the tree around the muzzle area are clearly visible, but the leaves and branches on the tree are obscured on the left side. This debris cloud is not centered around the impact area, but instead stretches far to the left of it, which is consistent with something striking from right to left.
You criticized gc70 as using “all conjecture and not supporting evidence,” but you based your so-called analysis on conjecture. The photos clearly show one guy in the background wearing a helmet, and a less-defined image of someone in the background not wearing a helmet. From the meager “evidence” of two guys not wearing helmets and one guy wearing a helmet, you believe that the photo is not of a battle scene. But there is nothing in any of that to reach a valid conclusion. Your belief is based on conjecture.
You mention your distrust of Fox twice, but you don’t mention Reuters at all, which is the source of the photos, not Fox. You’re using a “Fox” lens to analyze “Reuters” photos.
So now it's your turn. Please explain how the Marine can be part of a conspiracy that centers on him without him being one of the conspirators, especially when he’s “probably doing just what he is supposed to do,” which according to your theory is to participate in a faked photo and propaganda story.