Apparently I have to spoon feed you. The issue is NOT whether San Diego's overall crime rate is higher or lower than other similar sized cities.
Except that's the statement I made and the statement you responded to, which I then in turn responded to. Let me refresh your memory...
You said:
Me said:
I don't think that illegal immigrant crime in San Diego is that much worse than other inner-city crime in other areas. Just the color ot he person committing them.
Thats because you don't work here or live here. You haven't been to the DA's office or paid a visit to Otay Mesa or San Ysidro, or talked with the BP officers that patrol the border. What you "think" and .05 will get you a cup of coffee.
So I say that your crime caused by illegal immigrants (in addition to crime caused by legals) isn't that much worse that the crime found in any other comparable (in size) US city. You respond with the whole "that's because you're not
here man...you just
don't know." At which point I decided to verify what I already knew, that the San Diego area's crime stats are lower than other comparable cities with less illegals.
So it's not about spoon feeding, it's about you changing what you're claiming to say.
Really, it looks to me like you should
thank the illegals...all that Spanish being spoken seems to be scaring all the really scary criminals that inhabit every other city. (Yes, this is sarcasm...mostly)
So make it easier to come in through the front door and we'll have better luck at keeping out the criminals and terrorists that we don't want.
Nothing worth having is easy to attain.
Yes, because I'm sure most of the people posting here had to work
so hard for their citizenship. I know I sure did have to work hard for mine. It involved clawing my way tooth and nail out of a vagina...wow. Go me. Yeah, we might have a couple naturalized citizens engaging in this debate (but I'm guessing none from Mexico or points south), but nearly all the of the people I've heard argue to keep the status quo had to go through the herculean effort of
being born to earn their place here.
DITTO!
Let 'em all in.....AS LONG AS THEY'RE LEGAL!
Except that under current immigration laws and quotas, that would make it absolutely impossible for "'em all" to get in. There are more people who want to come to this country from Mexico than we would allow in legally during those people's lifetimes.
So basically your statement makes no logical sense. Unless, of course, by "'em all" you really just mean the few you're comfortable letting in. How progressive of you.
And the only way quotas will be raised or more will be let in legally, judging by what I see on Fox News (or even on the liberal networks...this seems to be one of the few uniting strands between both sides of the political divide) and what I hear in this forum, is if enough of them come up illegally, have babies, and manage to outvote you 18 years from now. I'm rooting for them. This is the main reason I disagree with WildAlaska on deportation and keeping out illegals until the law is changed. Because it won't
be changed.
What bugs me is that people cannot walk off the street into my gunclub, gym, etc without becoming a member, yet they can come into my country without becoming a "member" and reap all the benefits. If they want to become tax paying citizens, then go about it the right way. I have kids in college out of state that do not get in-state tuition rates, but here in MA they want to give illegal aliens in-state tuition rates, drivers license, etc. Yeah, there goes the cost of car insurance even higher. It's not right. Come here legally, pay taxes, fine...otherwise, stay away.
They're
giving them drivers licenses? Or are they "allowing them to have" driver's licenses...in other words, are they charging them the same as everybody else for them?
Also, I'll reiterate...it's easy for most of us to sit here and talk about them needing to do it "the right way" when for us the "right was" was being in the right place at the right time in the right birth canal. Yeah, I'm real proud of myself for that one. For anybody here who actually had to work for their citizenship arguing with me, I actually respect your opinion but disagree. For those that fell headfirst into their citizenship, along with a pile of goo, I can't take your righteous indignation that they don't want to respect the naturalization process seriously. Sorry.
As far as residency for in-state tuition goes...that's not about citizenship. The purpose of those requirements isn't just to establish some sort of ethereal "residency." It's because, as an in-state resident, the state is subsidizing a portion of your education. The idea is that you (or your parents) should probably have paid some in-state taxes to "chip-in" on that. Guess what: illegal aliens actually pay several forms of taxes, even state ones. Sales tax for starters. Property taxes too (either directly if they own, or indirectly if they rent). Depending on what kind of employment documentation they have (fake though it may be), they may be chipping in some sort of state income or payroll taxes as well. And while a few people here seem convinced they'd pass up the opportunity for a visa or citizenship if it meant paying taxes, I suspect a lot of them would be more than willing to; so for many it's not their fault they aren't paying their full share.
But that's not all. Part of the reason there are
exceptions to the residency requirements is the idea that while you may not have been a resident paying taxes (thus "chipping in" in the past), you may demonstrate the intent to contribute to the state economy in the future after you get your education. Which many illegal aliens (and their children) do intend to do.
I mean yeah, this used to annoy me to. I remember hearing that California was extending in-state tuition to some illegals, and being angry that I, as a US citizen (though not a California resident) couldn't get the same. Then I realized that an illegal living in California has actually paid more California taxes than I have, and contributed more to the California economy than I have. Then my white-guy indignation just melted away by the scorching heat of logic.
This is relevant how???
Perhaps I should be walking around in 80lbs of Conquistador armor also!
Who cares?
It has nothing to do with the present day situation.
Because it shows that where you were was once a Spanish speaking area, and may have been (though I'm not sure) a bilingual area ever since, just like the Southwest. So the righteous indignation may be a bit misplaced.
However, I do agree that it's pretty darn silly to have Spanish as the "primary" language when your area is not predominantly Spanish-speaking (and not even close). Which it doesn't appear to be. So yeah, it kinda pegs out the WTF?-o-meter for me, too. I don't care enough about the issue that I'd write them or stop doing business there, but I can understand why you might. I can't understand asking for any more than that.
I mean, I'm all for bilingualism, but some areas will be dominated by one of the two languages (in this case English...in others it actually would be Spanish (or Chinese, or other languages)). That should probably be respected. It should be "1" that we press for English, not "2" (at least for nationwide companies that serve a majority English userbase).
I mean, it wouldn't
infuriate me to have to press "2" instead of "1"...but it would annoy me a bit. I actually prefer the ones where I just stay on the line and hit nothing, but they have a second or two to hit something...but whatever. Having seen what quality of life is like in places like Iraq, it isn't enough to really bother me no matter how their phone menus shake out.