Can't the same be said for any of them though?
Why not the .270?
Why not the 30-06?
Why not the _________________
There is a great plethora of calibers in that area that are far more similar than not. None of them really stand head and shoulders above the rest so one can expect to here about any number of them more than any single one of them
I mean if you see 30-06, .270, 7MM, 30-06, .300 Win Mag, 308, .270, .308, 7MM, and 30-06 it seems like the 30-06 is the "not" most of the time when it is in fact over represented. Of the 10 choices made its only made 3 times. But if you consider that those three are more than any other single caliber it becomes clearer. Throw in a myriad of other choices beyond those 5 (why are none of the quarter bores mentioned or the .338) and it becomes more diluted.
Why not the .270?
Why not the 30-06?
Why not the _________________
There is a great plethora of calibers in that area that are far more similar than not. None of them really stand head and shoulders above the rest so one can expect to here about any number of them more than any single one of them
I mean if you see 30-06, .270, 7MM, 30-06, .300 Win Mag, 308, .270, .308, 7MM, and 30-06 it seems like the 30-06 is the "not" most of the time when it is in fact over represented. Of the 10 choices made its only made 3 times. But if you consider that those three are more than any other single caliber it becomes clearer. Throw in a myriad of other choices beyond those 5 (why are none of the quarter bores mentioned or the .338) and it becomes more diluted.