Why do you love revolvers?

I don't. The only reason I own a revolver is because it chambers a cartridge not available in a reasonable auto-loader. I switched from revolvers to semi-autos 25yrs ago with zero regret.

Revolvers are more expensive and less reliable and typically heavier and less capacity. What's not to dislike?
 
Own both, but prefer revolvers. Had revolvers first when I was young and they remind me of some good times.
 
I own a few really nice autos...a 1911 and a high standard, an ever-reliable XD; and a few others, including my favorite gun ever, my mark II. That being said, If I could own two pistols, the second would be my blackhawk convertible. There is no feeling like touching off a magnum round and feeling the shockwave. I have a gp100 and a few single sixes, and even a colt scout (or whatever they call their .22, too lazy to go look). None of them make you feel exactly like that gun. I want one in stainless.

In fact, I got into reloading just for that gun.
 
In order of importance:

1. Reliability
2. Simplicity
3. Safety of trigger pull
4. Can be shot through jacket or close to body without stoppage
5. Brass pick-up easier
6. Magnum loads
7. Asthetics
8. Nostalgia

But what I hate is the low number of rounds and the potential for an empty gun in a gunfight. However, this can be planned around with an easily accessible 2nd revolver and/or a well practiced speed reload.
 
I didn't realize until I bought my first 1911 how much I love revolvers. Five minutes on my hands and knees looking for brass was an eye opener. Now I also love Ruger Mark IIs!
 
Less hassle and can stay loaded forever practically.

Pick it up and stop the burgular-no thinking required.

And nobody ever mentions this but I will,modern revolvers carried hammer down won't fire until the cylinder rotates-when you pocket carry this just gives you one more layer of safety without any lever to operate to fire the gun.

(A safety note though-some very old single action revolvers will fire if dropped on their hammer by accident without the cylinder rotating.)

Revolvers are normally problem free.

I like problem free.
 
Back when I was a much younger man, and could only dream about owning a handgun, I used to pour over a dog eared copy of "The Shooters Bible" and wish. Most of the guns in that book then were revolvers. There wasn't the plethoria of semi-auto's then there are today. So I grew up dreaming about revolvers.

I still am today.
 
I like both revolvers and semi-autos.

I like them for different reasons. I've not needed to use any of my guns in any capacity other than recreational range shooting, so I can't claim that one is better than the other in terms uses.

However, I enjoy the mechanical quality of revolvers. I like the feeling in my finger and palm as the internals rotate the cylinder , heave back the hammer, and then the dramatic discharge of a powerful round.

With pistols, you can blast away 15 rounds in a go, reload fast and do it again but, the cycle is so fast, you just hear a bang and it's back to square one: no sense of the clockworks within!!
 
I'm starting to get a little arthrites in my hands and fingers and loading magazines can be a nuisance and a pain. I also like being able to load a revolver w/o making any noise. I haven't figured out yet how to rack a slide in complete silence.

Picking up brass is a nuisance.

I usually take both semi's and revolvers to the range and I save the revolvers until the end because they are more fun to shoot. I LOVE the feel of a really smooth DA trigger on a revolver.
 
Feel (I love the weight of a steel gun and the feel of wood grips)
Beauty (I can't stop looking at my single action revolvers!)
Realoading (I much prefer reloading simple straight walled revolver cartriges)
Versatility (all shapes and sizes, from a little puff to a big boom)
Simplicity (duh)
Reliability (not a single jam yet!)

And most importantly, because it's cool :cool:
 
Two words...

Packable Power!

Revolvers are King in this category. While there are some quite powerful bottom feeders available, to approach the power levels available in revolvers, the autos get REALLY BIG. And they still cannot match the power levels of the true big bore wheel guns. The .44 mag, the .45 Win Mag, and the .50AE are pretty much the pinnacle of power in auto pistols, while this level is just the beginning with revolvers. Even when you count only the revolver cartridges that will fit in standard length cylinders, 400 grain bullets easily be propelled to 1400fps and beyond.

When packable power is what is needed, reach for a big bore revolver! :D

JW
 
I'm a revolver guy at heart, but do carry a 9mm for capacity and convenience most of the time. The revolver goes with me to the woods, though, and my light summer carry is a .38 smith. They are no more reliable than a good auto in my opinion, but there's just something about them that makes them special. Plus, not chasing brass is a plus. All my expensive calibers keep the brass in the gun until I decide it's time for it to come out. Cheapo 9mm, .22, and .223 can land where it may. .357, .44 magnum, etc need to keep by me.
 
What Bellevance said in 2008:

I laughed when I read this:
4) I find the general "upchuck" and vomiting of an auto objectionable. One of the things I don't like about a center-fire auto is that when I shoot it, the slide slams back, brass gets spit out into the air (perhaps flying into my face or down my shirt), the slide slams forward, etc. Lots of jarring and commotion. With a revolver, the hammer falls and the bullet heads off to its target. That's it. The prep work for the next shot happens well after the previous one has been launched, at a time of your choosing.
Here's the link: http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=303749&highlight=upchuck
 
As Mike Irwin said, what's not to like?

Some things not yet said;
Pick up any older revolver (say, pre-1971) and listen as you open and close the cylinder. The sounds it makes as it locks up, that solid sound of old-fashioned forged steel moving into place.

Cock that DA revolver in a deliberate fashion and there is something very satisfying and unmistakable about the *snick-click-snick* the action makes.

Cock that Single Action Colt and listen to those four loud clicks. More satisfaction of finely fitted pieces working together.

1862PoliceEarlymod_18464_0787_1_lg.jpg


These are machines, but unlike many machines, once we knew how to make them work we didn't stop
trying to make them more eye appealing. They combine straight lines with enough curves to please the eye. It's called having class.
Diamondback_x600.jpg


Even the protective finishes we've used on them trended towards adding a bit of beauty and glamour to a piece of cold steel.
M57L_1086M.jpg


Even the most basic revolver has a pleasing combination. Plain, simple, efficient, yet eye pleasing.
SW_M64_07_PB.jpg


Someone else mentioned it and I feel it two. When shooting a revolver, you can sometimes feel a connection to all of the history behind them. When shooting a revolver we can easily begin to place ourselves in history. Firing a big bore magnum we wonder what Elmer Keith would have said. When shooting a simple .38 revolver, like the stainless model above, we can understand what it was like to be a policeman in the first half of the century (and why they wanted the .357 Magnum). Using a single-action gives us an appreciation for frontier life and to some extent how much braver real men were in those days.

The revolver had a 50 year head start on the self-loader and will always invoke certain memories. The revolver also has about a 130 year head start as the preferred police weapon. Only in the last 25-30 years has the pistol taken over.

Heck, I like 'em even when they're "all scratched up" like this one.
Wayne357small.jpg
 
Back
Top