You've made these false charges many times out here with no substantiation.
So have you with your bogus "blackout" claims. It would behoove you to clean your own house before you start demanding that others do the same.
You've made these false charges many times out here with no substantiation.
You've made these false charges many times out here with no substantiation.
Why do you persist in doing that?
If ever there was a gun that made me want to vomit...
The blimp you speak of was outside of any funds Ron Paul's campaign raised. He did not spend a cent towards the blimp.
WildlyInaccurateAlaska said:I mean 2o million dollars in fundraising for a blimp?
I appreciate what you're tryin to do, publius42, but I think it's wasted. WA will tell his lies about Paul in the hopes something will stick.No, he has raised 28 million at last report, and none of it had anything to do with the blimp project.
The blimp was a way to get around McCain's regulations on political speech, and I am curious what you think about it. It seems to be the only RP related topic that makes all his detractors completely mute, and I do wonder why that is...
As for the Boortz question, I'm a big fan of Neal Boortz and Ron Paul. I have no idea why he might refuse an interview request, if such a request was made. Let's have some facts to discuss. When did Neal ask Ron to come on the show, and were there any conditions attached to the proposed interview? I can see no reason why Ron Paul would not go on that show, though there are some disagreements between the two.
WA will tell his lies about Paul in the hopes something will stick.
He's already stated he may vote for Hillary Clinton, so we should judge based on that.
Teddy: one part of RON I did not like was the isolationist part
He is totally unqualified to be President.
Hey Stage, what do you think about the (now defunct and indebted) blimp project as it relates to campaign finance laws? (Isn't that a more interesting subject than the personalities of some of our colorful internet friends?)
It never ceases to amaze my why some of you spend so much time attacking a man who gets so few votes.
Ah yes, let's all jump behind gun grabber McShamnesty.
Stage2, Can you come up with an effective arguement to not support Ron Paul or Huckabee thru the primary process? Or should we just all just goose step beside you, marching behind McCain?
Personally I would rather see McCain fight his way to the apparent nomination.
I think McCain Feingold is as stupid and effective as a Ron Paul presidential run.
Do you think those folks were committing a crime by undertaking the project in that way? Our campaign finance laws are far too complex for mere mortals like myself to comprehend, but it sure seems likely to me that you could make a case that they were just circumventing the law. Thoughts on that subject?
You mean the McCain who voted against waiting periods, or the McCain who voted against the AWB, or the McCain who voted to repeal the AWB?
This is the kind of crap I'm talking about. Where did I say that I supported McCain, voted for McCain, or have any like for the man? Because I want people to use facts and not rhetoric I somehow approve of McCain? Give me a break.