what does everyone use in there HD shotgun?

i wasnt talking about birdshot as non lethal force.. i was referring to the rubber stingers,and i know its still classified as lethal force, and definatly not before verbal commands. if i can show i did everything i could before killing the guy, it helps alot
Mossy, you are mistaken. That will likely put in more trouble than not.

Lethal force is lethal force. If you are not justified in using lethal force, don't use your gun AT ALL, no matter what ammunition you have loaded in it. Don't say you shot him, but you used rubber rounds because you hoped it wouldn't kill him -- that implies that you felt the situation didn't justify the use of lethal force but you used lethal force (your shotgun) anyways. In most jurisdictions, deadly force is only justified if you (or another innocent) is about to die RIGHT NOW! Using a less-lethal round implies that you thought you weren't going to die RIGHT NOW! After all, if you did think you were going to die RIGHT NOW, you would have used "lethal" rounds.

If you want to start off with non-lethal force, then use something other than your shotgun -- command voice, OC spray, hands-on, etc.

Please take Ayoob's LFI-1. Failing that, read his book "In the Gravest Extreme." He's testified as an expert witness in many self defense cases. He has a very good understanding of what can get you in trouble, even if it doesn't seem to make sense to you. Realize that the law often isn't logical and is often very counter-intuitive. Ayoob strongly recommends against the use of less-lethal rounds for self defense.
 
i wasnt talking about birdshot as non lethal force.. i was referring to the rubber stingers,and i know its still classified as lethal force, and definatly not before verbal commands. if i can show i did everything i could before killing the guy, it helps alot

While I hear what you're saying about showing that you'd given the person the chance to back off, I agree with M1911. If you're in a case where you're not sure whether you're justified in using lethal force, then you simply should not use a gun.
 
thank you for your advise, i do see exactly where your coming from and ive contemplated this quite often. i have had my apartment broken into, and even if i think there might be someone there in the middle of the night i make my presence known. im 21 ive done mma most my life and am a 2nd degree black belt, so i dont take my shot gun as a first step by any means.and i have read and agree with alot of what Ayoob says, but i also know the mentality of the the people where i live and i know what my actions may be taken as.. im 20 miles north of seattle, washington, probably one of the biggest hippie populations in the US, and if i can show the granola eating population i tried, it helps. i dont always load the stingers, but if i can make that F***er rot behind bars instead of the easy way out, im all for it.. ;) ..


oh ...and last time my place was broken into, i had a Co2 BB gun and a right hook to the jaw.
 
A civilian bringing any firearm to bear is "lethal force" no matter the load in the gun in just about every jurisdiction in the whole wide world...
I poured out the shot from a light target load after cutting off the top. I put a blob of dry toilet paper in and shot at drywall from about 8 feet and made a right fine 2 inch hole.
Brent
 
There is no one rule covers all situations and I won't flame somebody for using 3 1/2" 10 gauge with 00 buck or a 410 loaded in a Judge if that's what they have. A 22 rifle in the hands of a marksman is a deadly weapon, but to flame somebody because he isn't shooting what you consider optimum or at least adequate shows either lack of maturity or real life experience.

Agreed. Use what you can, regardless of the "preference" of others. Having said this, I have arrived at my choice (Federal LE Low-Recoil 00 Buck) as it allows me to keep within the 00 Buckshot family, while also reducing overpenetration issues associated with "hotter" 00 loads. Like you, I have no apologies for using my preferred round.

Some of us have been there done that and we don't need a keyboard Kommando parroting the latest hot load or hot bullet from the latest issue of 'Killer Gremlins on the Warpath' magazine.

True as well. However, Im wondering just how many of us here have truly been through a violent HD encounter (involving shots fired, resulting in injury and/or death). Im betting not many...

BTW- All of this talk about "lethal force" and/or "non-lethal" ammo...Well, as has been mentioned before, aiming a weapon (much moreso firing one) at another human being had better be justified regardless of what resides in the chamber. Otherwise, one could find themselves sitting behind bars for a while. In essence, scrap the "non-lethal" stuff and load for serious intent. If you arent absolutely sure that your life is in imminent danger, keep the weapon down and finger off the trigger. Shoot to stop...not to wound or scare.

A weapon used for HD purpose is a weapon put on "stand-by"; for use if such an encounter may reasonably result in the harming/death of innocent lives (at the hand of the BG, of course). With this in mind, why would one even bother with non-lethal ammo?
 
Last edited:
Some of us have been there done that and we don't need a keyboard Kommando parroting the latest hot load or hot bullet from the latest issue of 'Killer Gremlins on the Warpath' magazine.
Been there done that, eh? Retired I guess since you are using that. By been there done that do you mean that you hunted goblins with #4 birdshot/dove shot/turkey shot? I doubt it.

Those of us who are still being there and doing that, and all the really smart and experience guys who are doing the testing, making the policies, and doing the training for those of us who are still being there and doing that disagree with you and your birdshot unanimously.
 
Why can't people understand that LE may have to use their shotguns at distance? Buckshot retains it's energy better at distance than smaller shot, and that is (or should be) the main reason for LE's use of it. At under 15 feet, smaller shot will work well.
 
My 500 is full of Winchester Lowrecoil 00 Buck. As far as putting in a less lethal round as my first shot, if someone breaks into my house when my family is home they will get the full force. I'll worry about the law later.
 
Why can't people understand that LE may have to use their shotguns at distance? . At under 15 feet, smaller shot will work well.
Because it's false. Check the various ballistic testing sites or even teh box of truth. All are tested at around 10 yards and birdshot fails (although BB and #2 or pretty close to acceptable penetration).
 
Lethal force is lethal force. If you are not justified in using lethal force, don't use your gun AT ALL, no matter what ammunition you have loaded in it. Don't say you shot him, but you used rubber rounds because you hoped it wouldn't kill him -- that implies that you felt the situation didn't justify the use of lethal force but you used lethal force (your shotgun) anyways. In most jurisdictions, deadly force is only justified if you (or another innocent) is about to die RIGHT NOW! Using a less-lethal round implies that you thought you weren't going to die RIGHT NOW! After all, if you did think you were going to die RIGHT NOW, you would have used "lethal" rounds.

If you want to start off with non-lethal force, then use something other than your shotgun -- command voice, OC spray, hands-on, etc.
The reply to that is "Of course it was lethal force, but the goal was to stop the threat, not necessarily to kill him."

But that's not really what I came here to say. I just wanted to know if anybody uses high-brass turkey loads?
 
Been there done that, eh? Retired I guess since you are using that. By been there done that do you mean that you hunted goblins with #4 birdshot/dove shot/turkey shot? I doubt it.

Those of us who are still being there and doing that, and all the really smart and experience guys who are doing the testing, making the policies, and doing the training for those of us who are still being there and doing that disagree with you and your birdshot unanimously.

Did 2 Nam tours courtesy of a Democratic administration, Later coached an Army Reserve pistol team and taught marksmanship to police and the sheriff's department.

I lived on the wrong side of the tracks a few times, jnot much choice at the time. I Have had my apartment busted into 3 times, first time I wasn't home and I didn't have a gun, second time had a 22 revolver, last time was armed with a 38 super and San Diego police thought it was a fine gun. That was in 1970 I think maybe 71, its been awhile.

Drunks tried to break in through my patio door in Bolingbrook Illinois, never underestimate the power of a barking 9 month old pup and a 45 in the hands of a perturbed wife to sober a couple of guys up.

I did have a goblin target recently discarded with a hole just big enough to stick my thumb through that was fired at with #4 shot from 24' and there was a little tear on the lower right corner from the shot wad bouncing off the paper but I can't honestly say I ever shot a goblin. #4 is my choice for turkey load in both my 20 and my 12 gauge guns and for my go to HD gun, that is my choice right or wrong, it is my choice.

I have fired 00 and 000 buck but only at targets, paper and water filled pop bottles. I shoot a lot of slugs just practicing, .410, 20 and 12 and I have taken a deer at around 70 yards with the slug, it was impressive.

I have made clean holes in 2x4's with #6 shot at 10' to show the students in a gun introductory course I was teaching for the women from a local church at our gun club. As part of my demonstration I shot a 5 gallon bucket at 200 yards with my S&W M41 22 cal pistol to show they really should have more respect for the lowly 22.

Took my black bear with a 32 Win spcl and it would be my choice for the go outside gun because it is light, handy, accurate and I am very familiar with it. I used to use my 357 Dan Wesson for deer hunting for nearly 30 years but eyes got a little old for that kind of hunting. Do my deer hunting now with a 44 mag revolver from a stand, a single shot, (scoped), 308, a 50 cal inline muzzle loader and a crossbow, (scoped), depending on the season and where I am hunting. Gamo air rifle for small game has replaced my 22 pistol, same range but it has a scope and my old eyeballs really are beginning to appreciate optics.

I have a blow gun too but don't use it for hunting, I know my limitations and I'm not sure it would be legal.

Mess with my family or my house and find out what an Old Grump can do with #4 shot. There are a lot of us who have walked through the woods and I don't mean tree's in a state park and we got old because we learned what to do and how to do it when it needed doing.

Not exactly a Goblin target and not a shotgun target but this was shooting 5 rounds of ball ammo, right handed only, at 25 yards standing on my hindlegs. Will it do? And if I choose to use a shotgun and #4 shot instead of my 45 inside my house do you think I might have a reason for doing so?

ColtMKIVat25Yards001.gif
 
Sorry it took so long to reply, I was in the field....God i love Artillery....anyways...

I fully understand that birdshot is lethal at close range, but at the same time, compared to buckshot, I have a much greater chance of NOT killing somebody, especially if my first shot is towards the extremities...

Furthermore, i understand the next counter-arguement is about how nervous people get in a self-defense situation, and how my shot placement will be severly diminished, where aiming at somebodies legs is ridiculous and dangerous...Well, i have been in these situations, and strongly feel that this is not true, for me.
 
ColtMKIVat25Yards001.gif



This target was banned at our local range, not long after 9/11, despite the fact that so many folks wanted to use it.

Range officials told us that they had a strict ban on using targets of real human beings.

--
 
Range officials told us that they had a strict ban on using targets of real human beings.
As the Vice President of a gun club, my response considered response is that they are pussies. :rolleyes:
 
I don't trot that one out to often because it does offend some people but I have similar targets shot at the same range with 38, 357, 44, 44 mag, 41 mag and 3 different 45's, this naturally was the best one. Still if I ever have to get up in the wee hours I prefer the smoothbore to the little handcannon. At 8 yards there was a single large hole at the bridge of his nose, at 25 yards the group was spread fairly evenly around the target and centered in the middle. My house isn't 25 yards long and the longest possible shot is 24', sometimes good enough is good enough.

Fortunately Kmar40 is unanimous so I can rest easy tonight knowing I am wrong and anybody who disagrees with him is wrong. It is good to have a shining light shining the bright beam of the truth, the whole truth and the only truth upon us ignorant people. I bow to his superiority and expertise.
 
Why can't people understand that LE may have to use their shotguns at distance?

I understand this...and agree with it. I just do not necessarily agree with using slug for HD, but thats just me.

However, I have read far too many accounts where LEOs, for one reason or another, have used 00 Buck well beyond 25 yards....to no avail, of course. Maybe its a departmental thing, I dunno...Im not LE.

Basically, I tend to see it this way (relating to HD/PD): buckshot (or if so inclined, birdshot) = inside; slugs = outside.

For HD, I still prefer Low-Recoil 00 Buck to all else. To me, as I have mentioned before, it somewhat bridges the gap between using either full 00 Buck or Birdshot. Each to his/her own.

Stay safe out there and use what you have. After all, if it comes down to it one day, that may be the only thing standing between you, your family and serious injury/death.
 
Last edited:
Those of us who are still being there and doing that, and all the really smart and experience guys who are doing the testing, making the policies, and doing the training for those of us who are still being there and doing that disagree with you and your birdshot unanimously.
Are those really smart and experienced guys the same ones who decided that the 9MM is superior to the .45ACP?

DC
 
First, grumpy Old Grump, thanks for you service. I mean that sincerely and the rest of this stuff is merely internet nonsense. The truth is that most of us will never need our home weapons and those of us who still grab pistols, shotguns and carbines as a tool of the trade usually have the decisions made for us. (Though it sounds like you live in a rough neighborhood and may have a greater risk.)

With all due respect, I've majority of combat vets have absolutely no experience that would qualify as anything resembling terminal ballistics expertise. Nor do small town PD instructors or the guys that teach BRM to weekend warriors. I've done the last two, BTW. The rest of my resume frankly isn't for public consumption.

My answer to you is simple. Cite an legitimate instructor who agrees with you that birdshot is an effective home defense round and provide a link. It's as simple as that. Ayoob? Fackler? Col. Goblinhunter? The Box o Truth Guy? FBI? Border Patrol? Secret Service? Walmart Security? Bart the Mall Cop?

Does anyone with a professional reputation say that 4" of penetration is effective for self defense even at short range? Do you use frangible ammo in those 45 ACP pistols to ensure they only penetrate 4-5 inches? Something other than the old wives tale that "I hear tale that it's good enough"? Anything? Ballistic gelatin testing that says the super #4 "turkey" shot penetrates deeper than the rest of the mere mortal #4 bird shot? (The last one does give me slight pause because I know that some of the new shots may be both heavier and harder than lead. If there's testing out there, I'm all ears.)

I'm only asking you to open your mind a bit and consider what you think you know. I was once just like you and believed what my father told him (that his father probably told him), "Just stuff birdshot in it and it's good enough for close range!" Take some time, look at the ballistic gelatin tests or go shoot a pig or maybe a thawed butterball or something. See how deeply that #4 shot penetrates FLESH or some reasonable substitute.

The fact that all the tactical schools and instructors are unanimously in opposition to your advice should give you some pause.

Are those really smart and experienced guys the same ones who decided that the 9MM is superior to the .45ACP?
Interesting point. I assume you are a big bore, heavy bullet deep penetration guy who thinks that the 9mm is too small and doesn't penetrate enough, right? Yet you-- I think-- are suggesting that birdshot which penetrates about half as much as a 22 short is adequate?

I'll be waiting quietly. We've rehashed this so often I doubt I will respond as it's all been said over and over in the nearly daily threads.

But again, thanks for serving Old Grump.
 
Last edited:
This is a great read..All the opinions have my respect.

This is why i use Benneke Tactical HD slugs
flat trajectory
good accuracy
allows quick, accurate follow up shots if needed
good knock down power
controlled penetration / low risk of dangerous exiting
designed for urban use
proven for law enforcement
most comfotable for recoil sensitive shooters
Shotty carrying LEO's in my area love these.

I don't believe in the "one shot" BS. Doesn't happen in the real world. When the SHTF, your heart is pumping 180 over 180, and you ****** yourself..."one and done" is just plain lucky. What needs to be taken into consideration, more than anything else, is follow up shots.
Most important thing? Get a stop or knock down. Then check for continued threat. Follow up if needed. Don't matter what your throwing at the BG, Shot or slug..it's all the same.... STOP threat. I think everyone is right. Shoot what you have confidence in.

Collateral damage should be taken into account in your SHFT plan. I personally will not go looking for the BG in a home invasion situation. I will set the BG up in a death zone. In my home, there is only one way to get to me and my family. This zone provides cover for me, protection for my family, and no where to hide for the BG's. They can have everything in the house, but once they cross into the zone. It's on and over and collateral damage is at its utmost minimum.
Back on the slug/shot shpeel...I just have more confidence in these slugs over any shot out there.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top