Taurus haters?

Status
Not open for further replies.
How do you get photos to show up like this? When I attach photos, all that shows is a dumb link.
I use Imgur and transfer my images from my computer to that website.
When you view a selected image you want to post on this forum or any forum to the right of the image a list of editing tools that have image link, direct link, and BBCode(message boards and forums). I use the BBCode and select copy. At the bottom of the list are sizes and depending on the size it allows to select original or small and other sizes. I have an iMac and it also allows me to drag from my library on some forums, some allow it some don't .
 
For Taurus semi autos I'll never own another or reccomends one. Their CS is atrocious. For the few Taurus revolvers I've had and shot they are perfectly fine for me and haven't had a single problem. My wife has a Taurus 7 shot 357 mag in her nightstand.

And IMO to have a 12 week turnaround on repair work means their repair department is BUSY and IMO shows very little quality control before guns leave. I understand all firearm makers have QC issues and to me the biggest problem is how Taurus handled my personal CS problem. 7 months later and I still didn't have a working firearm.

I've sent things back to Ruger, Sig Sauer, Mossberg, and Armscor (Rock Island Armory) and I've never paid shipping or paid for repair and received a working, fixed forearm in less than 2 weeks.
 
Last edited:
I've noticed that the incidence and lethality of chemtrails goes up when I buy a Taurus product.:D Seriously, I agree that over the years it's a hit-or-miss thing with Taurus--when they are good--they can be very good, when they are bad, that's when you find out there's not any real kind of domestic factory support and your weapon will be in Brazil-and-back purgatory for quite some time.;)
 
As I understand things, Taurus has a new CEO who is fully aware of their image problem and who is committed to turning that around. To me, from my simplistic way of thinking, he only has one thing to resolve. Stop letting their 1 - in - 1000 bad guns from getting shipped out for sale to customers. That creates a horrible quality image as well as an over-load on their warranty repair people, which is currently at a 12 - week turnaround time ... largely due to a backlog of bad guns sold under prior CEOs.
 
Taurus and their QA stands alone. The mods don't have a bias one way or the other just like you can get a good Taurus or get a bad one.
 
the biggest gripe I read regarding current Taurus products is their incredibly terrible customer service. if you get a good one, you got a good one. if you got one with problems it will literally take the turn of several calendar pages and some shipping to and from money out of your pocket before it its fixed.
 
I was in the local farm and ranch store today and looked at a couple of the small framed Taurus's , they look pretty darned good but the triggers were terrible compared to Smiths, they had very few due to panic buying so 5 probably isn't a good sample.
 
I've got over 13 Taurus revolvers and about as many pistols. Some from the middle 1980s. They are all ticking along just fine.

Most of my other pistols and revolvers are Beretta or Rugers.
 
jimku said:
I recently bought a Taurus 605 357 snubbie. The cylinder would not lock up … checked out fine at my FFL, but when I got home and loaded it with snap caps to give it a good "work out", the problem surfaced. They sent me a pre-paid shipping label, and they have a 12-week turn-around on warranty work. That was three weeks ago.
My father had a similar issue, as well as (dangerously) bad timing, with one of their 3" barrel .38 Special J-frame clones in what, at the time, was their "matte blue".

Once it was in Taurus's hands, they told him it was unsafe and that they absolutely would not return it to him. But that model was out of production, so they couldn't replace it.
He demanded a refund. They refused. Pissing contest was born. ('Unstoppable force vs immovable object'; or 'Karen vs Karen' type of thing.)

Long story short... Without his approval, they shipped one of their 7-shot .357 Mag snubbies, in bright chrome (M85 I think), to his FFL and closed the workorder.

Not what he bought. Not what he sent to them. No consent from him. Not the same retail value.
But that's what he was stuck with.

Guess what?

It didn't lock up properly, either.
Rather than send it to Taurus, he had a gunsmith fix it.
That lasted about 10 years.
Last time he had it out to shoot it, it was striking the edge of the primers. About 6 rounds of improperly aligned detonations, and it stopped locking up properly, again.



My own Taurus experience...?
I think the "Raging" series is fairly decent, and wouldn't mind several of them.
But.

I no longer own anything Taurus.
Quality control doesn't exist.
Rather than make good guns, they prefer to just make a crap-ton of cheap guns with minimal oversight, and then let the repair center pick up the slack IF someone complains.

One of my Taurus pistols was so bad, overall, that Taurus had an in-house recall on the model. It was the pre-official recall, pre-Millenium, pre-Pro, pre-B (the recall), PT-138 .380 Auto. If that model makes it back into their hands, they won't let you have it back. They will only offer a current equivalent replacement (if they have one), or let you buy something else at wholesale cost.

Mine was serial number 8. First day. First shift. Everything was wrong with it. But still SN 8. While Taurii are not generally considered collectible, a serial number that low does bring additional value, with the right buyer. I wasn't about to hand it over.

I fixed it myself, got it mostly reliable after a lot of fiddling and load experimentation, and ran it for about 14 years; before finally dumping that crap-tastic attempt at a firearm before it blew up on me. Excellent condition, unnatural reliability, SN 8, original box, a spare magazine, and still surviving in the wild. I doubled my money, and then some.
Best deal on a Taurus, ever.
 
You are free to buy and shoot what you want. I personally think the finish on most Taurus revolvers is plain ugly, which is why I choose to avoid them.
 
One thing positive I have to say about Taurus quality is that it caused me to learn more about gunsmithing on revolvers.

I wanted a trigger job done on my Taurus revolver and no local smith would touch it. They all said variations of, "Taurus revolvers' lockwork QA is so often bad that the frequency of poor outcomes when doing any work on them was such that I no longer work on them."

So, I researched and did the trigger job my own self, resulting in a great trigger on a snubby.

That gave me the confidence to smith on my Smith & Wesson revolvers and those have been improved.
 
As I understand things, Taurus has a new CEO who is fully aware of their image problem and who is committed to turning that around. To me, from my simplistic way of thinking, he only has one thing to resolve. Stop letting their 1 - in - 1000 bad guns from getting shipped out for sale to customers. That creates a horrible quality image as well as an over-load on their warranty repair people, which is currently at a 12 - week turnaround time ... largely due to a backlog of bad guns sold under prior CEOs.
1 in 1000 is .1%, to be able to make 99.9% good guns is a really good figure for today's gun makers.

The problem is their turn around times when guns get shipped back to them for work. A month is understandable, but over two is unacceptable. I cannot think of any other gun company that has that long a wait time to repair a gun, so that's the first thing that needs to be improved.
 
My first experience with Taurus handguns came in 1989, if memory serves me well. The first new Taurus that I bought for myself was in 1994, and I'm certain of that.

Here's what I'm 100% certain that I know to be true:
Some Taurus handguns are terrific and some are outrageously problematic.

It seems that many folks with time and experience in this game eventually figure this out. Some folks get burned early and burned hard and they have written off Taurus entirely (and it's hard to argue with their conclusion if you are rational about it) but I know for sure that if you have the ability to grab one and shake it out, you might be rewarded.

I would never, and I will never ever recommend the purchase of any Taurus for any new shooter or anyone who has novice level experience in buying, owning and enjoying handguns. In my learned opinion, you are setting someone up for face down in the gutter FAILURE if you do that. Taurus makes far too many problematic guns to ever recommend one to any new or newish gun owner and their "warranty" is an absolute sham. A total lying, disgusting run-around waste of time AND money burned in shipping.

But a good Taurus and a great Taurus absolutely exist and when you find one, it's a keeper!

Back in 1994 Clinton's "Crime Bill" and AWB was literally weeks before going in to effect and it pushed a 21-year old me in to buying my first 9mm, I felt that I needed a hi-cap double stack before I couldn't get one. I settled on the PT-99AF and the ignorant Brady Bill meant that I was stuck with a useless "waiting period" to get it, but I plunked down my very hard-earned money (I was 21, keep in mind!) and I never actually did much handling of the pistol and I never even dry fired it. The day came when I finally picked it up and the double action trigger on the gun I had purchased was unbelievably horrendous. Not "lousy" but more like "holy crap, is this broken?!" and the gun store was good enough to let me exchange it for another in stock for no charge but since the serial number was different... I had to wait for a whole second Brady Bill wait period (and I had to pay for another NICS check, I want to remember it was like $10?!) but the pistol I ended up buying was FAR better.

And I still have it! It's not a Wilson-ized Beretta but this sucker has been a solid handgun for the last 25 years and it's been a fine example of a GOOD Taurus but even this first one that I ever bought wasn't the first one... it was the second because the first one was crap.
 
I believe and this is just a belief... that if a country can't make a good enough car to compete in the global economy you probably shouldn't buy a gun made there, lots of examples of that but I won't focus on the negative.
Here's a few examples, the short list, Italian cars and Italian guns both amazing, German cars and guns likewise, American cars and guns likewise.:D
 
I believe and this is just a belief... that if a country can't make a good enough car to compete in the global economy you probably shouldn't buy a gun made there...

Good point, Double K. I'll only add the Japanese to your list of countries.

Don
 
All totally reasonable comments so far, nothing in any of them that I can take issue with.

I agree that Taurus quality is spotty, you pays your money and you takes you chances, but when you get a good gun, it IS a GOOD gun. I have a Taurus Tracker .41 magnum that is an outstanding revolver, that has proven reliable with over 1,000 rounds down range, is VERY accurate and has a trigger and lockup to die for.

I recently bought a Taurus 605 357 nubby and before even firing it, found that after about 100 dry-firings with snap caps, the cylinder stopped locking up and the gun was flat dangerous. It is in for warranty work, has been there four weeks, but they have a 12-week turnaround. From all the negative publicity about their warranty work I am apprehensive about what I might get back. On the other hand there are stellar Youtube reviews of the Taurus 605 all over the place. I hope I get back a stellar firearm, but ...?

I understand that Taurus has a new CEO who is fully aware of their problems and who is committed to getting things turned around, especially their poor customer service (warranty work and wait times). In live chats with customer service I am told this is true, that changes are taking place as we speak. I guess time will tell and we shall see.

Regarding guns made in other countries, I recently bought a Bersa/Llama 380 MicroMax pistol. I no sooner picked it up at my FFL and I was notified there was a recall on a certain range of serial numbers for my gun. My serial number was in the list, so off it went back to them. Seems they had over-hardened the slides on those guns to the point of them being brittle. It took 6 months to get my gun back! No gunsmithing whatsoever, just to simply replace the slide!
https://www.ammoland.com/2017/11/llama-micromax-380-1911/#axzz6Q87vYlqZ


attachment.php
 
Last edited:
The bit about “new CEO who is aware of the reputation and working towards fixing” is possible I supposed but at this point... I have heard the same internet forum schtick word for word for YEARS.

Show me, Mr. CEO, because most of us have seen this line before and I for one am not buying it.

If I owned my own gun store, I would likely take used Taurus guns in on trade or sale and I would continue to keep hand selected Taurus guns in my own collection at home but NEVER would I carry new Taurus guns as products for sale in my store because I’m sure it would tarnish the buying public’s opinion and buying experience at my shop.

End this post on a positive note:

The 3 and or 4-inch barrel .44 Special revolvers they made back in the 1990’s and early 2000’s seem to be almost immune to the Taurus curse. These suckers are fantastic guns just about every time I come across one.
 
Japan, Sweden and probably someone else I've forgotten.
Although I'm not a fan of Volvo's cars per se they are pretty darn good and their heavy equipment and over the road trucks are fantastic.
My favorite front end loaders and excavators are Komatsu and although I love my Fords it's hard to beat the mid size Toyota trucks.

**********
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top