I've never handled a Canik, just my CZ's.
Curious, how would you compare the clone to the real thing? Trigger, fit, finish etc?
The Caniks appear to be a little better finished on internals. The machining is nicer, smoother, and more refined. Out of the box, the trigger is a little smoother (still a little grit, but not as much) and the SA is a hair nicer (the casual shooter will not notice it). The safeties are not as nice, a little harder to flick on/off, but they also use a retention ball/spring for positive lock in either position. Also, while springs and sights are available, there isn't quite the aftermarket support for the Caniks as there is for the CZs (though there are a few that are making/modifying Caniks with CGW being the foremost). I've got a P120 and a T100 and had a T120.
The T120 was not to my liking, the alloy frame made it seem toy like to me (too light). It was also the least accurate of the 3 (4-5in at 25yrds)
The T100 is now my daughter's pistol after I did some spring swapping and put it through some rigorous testing. It is the middle child in accuracy (3-4in at 25yrds). It carries well, so I'd expect the same of the C100 overall.
The P120 is nice, but it's no SP01 (which it's supposed to be a clone of). It's nearly as accurate, but the balance is just a hair off (another thing a casual shooter won't notice), and the barrel is not a heavy barrel like the SP01. It's a good stand in for someone that cannot find/afford a SP01, but not a replacement. It was close, but not quite on accuracy (2.0-2.5in at 25yrds vs my SP01's 1.5-2.0in at 25yrds).