Marko Kloos said:Oh, lordy. You don't want a candidate with principles. You want the slick, unassailable professional used car salesman who determines his opinion by polls. Moreover, you deserve him.
couldnt have said it better myself.
Marko Kloos said:Oh, lordy. You don't want a candidate with principles. You want the slick, unassailable professional used car salesman who determines his opinion by polls. Moreover, you deserve him.
Oh, lordy. You don't want a candidate with principles. You want the slick, unassailable professional used car salesman who determines his opinion by polls. Moreover, you deserve him.
That's the kind of criticism you have to drag out of the hat now? That Ron Paul took money from a kook?
Oh, lordy. You don't want a candidate with principles. You want the slick, unassailable professional used car salesman who determines his opinion by polls. Moreover, you deserve him.
Blood diamonds are "tainted money". Drug profits are "tainted money". Sweatshop proceeds are "tainted money". Political donations out of the personal pocket of a kooky racist are not "tainted money".
Do you only do business with someone after you thoroughly examine their political point of view? Do you only take a paycheck from people with whom you agree politically and philosophically?
Your "tainted money" claim in regards to Ron Paul is a.) bogus
Your "tainted money" claim in regards to Ron Paul is a.) bogus, and b.) just a grasping at a very brittle straw trying to paint Ron Paul as some sort of unprincipled KKK sympathizer.
Mainah said:but he sure hasn't done much to shake off that image.
stage2 said:As an aside, given Don Black's rap sheet and numerous run-ins with the law its not out of the question that this money is actually illegally tainted.
stage2 said:Which is yet another reason why you don't associate with these folks.
+1Okay, just another attempted smear of Ron Paul. Nothing to see here, folks, let's move on.
So if we don't follow your marching orders and "denounce" then we've not done the "right thing?" :barf::barf::barf:Now I'm curious. Are the Paul supporters going to show up here and say that taking money from a bigot is perfectly acceptable, or are they going to do the right thing and denounce this.
Do you only do business with someone after you thoroughly examine their political point of view? Do you only take a paycheck from people with whom you agree politically and philosophically?
it's practically impossible to find 2 people who share exactly same POV w/o any dissent in this world.