Please elaborate on what you are trying to say.This donation is Ron Paul's potential Sista' Soldier moment, a chance to put a controversial moron in the spotlight and then just destroy them.
Please elaborate on what you are trying to say.This donation is Ron Paul's potential Sista' Soldier moment, a chance to put a controversial moron in the spotlight and then just destroy them.
If similar in-depth studies were conducted in other major cities, who doubts that similar results would be produced? We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, but it is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, muggings, and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers.
Mr. Paul also wrote that "By far the most powerful lobby in Washington of the bad sort is the Israeli government" and that the goal of the Zionist movement is to stifle criticism
wheres your documentation? you make an awful lot of accusations without any proof.
This is not about morality, but control - defining which groups are acceptable or unacceptable and dictating how people can interact with those groups.
from what i can gather, it is actually not illegal for a felon to donate. so dont even bother with the evidence, ill accept that its true. cause it doesnt matter.
I will admit you guys are a real flexible group.
to me it's a minor issue
Blacks have "civil riqhts," preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black beauty contests, black tv shows, black tv anchors, black scholorships and colleges, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.
This entire thread starts off with a presumption that RP's campaign did something wrong. Further, the choices offered are between "you're an incompetent boob if you give it back" and "you're a loser if you keep it."
The supposition that because RP has raised some money he should give it back, even if his opponents are able to outspend him 6:1, denies the realities of modern politics. Claiming that if he keeps it, that somehow says he's incompetent and lacking integrity which disqualifies him to be president is ludicrious. Especially in light of the alternative...
Which the OP says that acceptance of a donation it lends tacit approval of the donor's mindset and thus it must mean that RP harbors similar thoughts. Does that mean the candidates have to grill each donor to make sure the candidate agrees with all of the donor's stances on all issues?
If you found that Sarah Brady made a $50 contribution to RP's campaign and he wasn't going to return it, would you suddenly spout off that he must, therefore, endorse every idiotic anti-gun thought that's gone through Sarah Brady's five braincells?
Its 100% about defining which groups are unacceptable.
stage2 said:I see. So now the standard changes from "anyone but felons" to "anyone". I will admit you guys are a real flexible group.
gc70 said:The PC crowd does not have a good record of "defining which groups are unacceptable
if you actually paid attention you would have noticed that i believed that it was illegal for a campaign to accept donations from a felon. if that were true, then i would have a problem with it. since i researched it a bit and found out it is not illegal, then it doesnt matter if he was a felon or not. why would you think i would be ok with a white supremacist donating, but not a felon? your intellectual dishonesty is astounding.
The PC crowd does not have a good record of "defining which groups are unacceptable."
Shunning groups because you disagree with them politically is just another form of bigotry. The liberalMedia has successfully indoctrinated much of this country into believing that intolerance is a narrow-minded quality of the less educated, unless it’s regarding people who they don’t like: then intolerance suddenly becomes a “virtue.”
This donation is Ron Paul's potential Sista' Soldier moment, a chance to put a controversial moron in the spotlight and then just destroy them.
Please elaborate on what you are trying to say.
How passe; Nazi and Bolshevik sympathizers were the darlings of the PC crowd long ago.Are you suggesting that there will be a time that Nazi sympathizers are acceptable?
stage2 said:It seems that there is nothing "legal" that you find repugnant.