Banners don't mean much. Talk to the people. RP had banners, signs and graffiti all over the place. Didn't do him much good.
When a candidate has FoxNews in his corner, who needs banners.
Banners don't mean much. Talk to the people. RP had banners, signs and graffiti all over the place. Didn't do him much good.
When a candidate has FoxNews in his corner, who needs banners.
Playboypenguin
Your racism is clear and apparent.
There is mathematically no way for McCain to carry the south, and without the south, he can't win.
How about sharing a little of your mathmatical prowess with the rest of us? Sounds like horse dung, to me. I don't think Obama will carry any state that traditionally votes Republican.
I'm not suggesting that Obama deserves a free ride, but his candidacy is a historic achievement for all of us. I don't find it so monumental that I'll vote for him, but I am proud of our country when I consider that when I was very young a guy like Obama might not be able to sit at a lunch counter, and now he's got a good shot at the White House.
Democrat turn out was higher than Republican turnout in every other Southern state. Add to that the fact that McCain has trouble with his conservative base and consider the fact that the South is very conservative... well, the writing is on the wall, now isn't it.
What was the GOP thinking giving us a liberal for president in the traditionally conservative republican party???
And it really does bug me when somebody says McCain is a "liberal." There are conservative organizations out there that rate every Senator based on their votes over time. And every one of those organizations rates McCain as a conservative. If you want to waste 15 minutes of your time, lay out Obama's voting record in the Senate and compare it vote by vote to McCain. If McCain is "a liberal," they should match up. They most certainly do not.
tulsamal said:The Democratic turnout was higher in the primaries because it was a contest. Two candidates were spending truly massive amounts of money. Comparing how many voters from each party voted in a primary seems like an indicator that is prone to failure.
tulsamal said:And it really does bug me when somebody says McCain is a "liberal."
Goodness. You are saying the Obama is more liberal than mccain and that means mccain is not a liberal? Ummm... obama is also more liberal than hillary clinton. Does that mean that hillary is also not a liberal?tulsamal said:If you want to waste 15 minutes of your time, lay out Obama's voting record in the Senate and compare it vote by vote to McCain. If McCain is "a liberal," they should match up. They most certainly do not.
tulsamal said:No, McCain wasn't my pick for ideal candidate. But I'm VERY happy that the former mayor of NYC didn't win the nomination. I would be complaining right along with you in the case. And I didn't like the Gov. of Mass. either. I'll take McCain over either one of them.
How can a liberal democrat be a conservative?
I'll try not to comment with utter absurdity as much.
I agree. It is better to use the standard of "supporting and defending" the Constitution versus violating the Constitution. McCain falls on the wrong side of that standard.People need to get off of the Liberal vs Conservative labels
MikeyBoy
Q: Why is McCain not a true conservative?
A: Because he is soft on the border and illegals.
And turn the United States into a third world country once & for all."Mr. Obama’s election to the presidency would send a great message to the country and the world.”
I find this statement kind of funny. Which tactics would really have a bigger chance of turning us into a 3rd world country?And turn the United States into a third world country once & for all