Not the worst list I’ve seen. I would not buy any on that list except the Canik. I’d like to try one of those. More as a “can they really make guns?” inquiry.
The Walther’s seem like a good gun, but it has been reported to me that the Walthers have an uncomfortably light trigger, even for an intermediate competitive shooter. They also have no safety. I don’t consider that positive for a first pistol.
CZ is probably solid, but has not been as well received in the US except by people already looking at CZ. It is probably a decent safetyless pistol.
Didn’t the 320 have issues with “going off” unexpectedly? Didn’t Sig struggle to address this satisfactorily? I guess they did raise the pull weight and roughen up the travel. I don’t really know first hand. I find them wide and expensive. They did convince the military to dump the Berretta….so there is that. Compact often just equals hard to shoot in service guns.
The Walther as a whole is lighter than all the others on the list. That's the one thing I've noticed. It also has my favorite grip texture of the bunch. The CZ seems good so far, plus I've not heard anyone say really anything bad about them. They do have the P07 and P09 which are DA/SA Hammer fired guns. If I can find one to try I'm going to as they seem like a solid option as well. As for P320 price, a base one locally to me is under 500, which makes the Walther the most expensive of the group by about 150 bucks.