Theohazard
New member
If by "Internet BS" you mean "well-established facts", then sure.Tin Foil said:Just don't try to come here with some internet b.s. to sway your point of view because you think you have it all figured out.
Huh? Have you ever actually fired a shotgun at room distance using defensive ammo? The pattern is a few inches at most. The whole "you don't have to aim a shotgun" thing is yet another myth, and it's a ridiculous one.Tin Foil said:All someone has to do is point that shotgun in the right direction and they are hitting something.
At room distance even an off hit is doing some hurt.
Again, I have to say, "Huh?" One of the advantages a semi-auto rifle has over a shotgun is in engaging multiple attackers. The higher capacity and much lower recoil give it a clear advantage in that situation.Tin Foil said:What happens when your plan calls for more than one home invader ? Think it's far fetch, look it up. Your typical home invasion now consist of multiple intruders. A shotgun gives you far better odds while still being safe to use in the home environment.
And no matter how many times you repeat it, a shotgun is not "safe to use in the home environment". How many different tests do we have to link before you stop posting this nonsense?
That's true, but that's only assuming I'm outdoors, and there aren't very many situations where I'd be shooting at someone who was outside my house. Indoors, defensive .223 ammo will travel through building materials far less than buckshot will.Tin Foil said:Your .223 will still travel further than any shot shell if you miss.
And you're doing an excellent job of adding to that 99.9%.Tin Foil said:And of a certain age to understand and realize the intenet is 99.9% b.s.
Tin Foil, it's pretty clear that you don't know very much about this subject. And that's OK; this forum is a great place to learn. But you don't appear to be interested in learning anything, and instead you're arguing with people who are giving you good information.