Stop Marring a Good Time
The real ignorance of the constitution - and the marring of an otherwise fine decision - is shown by the above and similar-type comments, which equate difference in opinion with treason; the Bill of Rights was written to safeguard against these very same attitudes and consequent dictatorial actions on the part of our Government.
You should take a course in the basic construction of the country as found in the constitution: a giant and malfunctioning Swiss watch, which isn't supposed to espouse unified beliefs, but the competing interests of various groups, conflicting interpretations of law, inherent and human disagreements of all kinds. Out of this melting pot of conflict in government, the essence of freedom of the people lies, for no opinion of any one power can push out others. You would have it otherwise.
The country will not tolerate extremist views of guns in either form: those who would ban all guns, or those who would push out any restrictions on guns. Running around in a self-righteous/condemning celebration of a moderate legal decision is not the way to go. It misreads the court and the country, and the constitution. It will backfire on you.
Enjoy the decision in a healthy way like most of us are, but best not start the witch-fires or haul out the guillotines.
To those Judges that dissented: .......
It is plain text, in English. There is no bias allowed.
Yet, for some unknown reason, you choose to break your vows to me and every other citizen; including yourself.
You dissented AGAINST The Bill of Rights.
By my definition, I call it Treason
The real ignorance of the constitution - and the marring of an otherwise fine decision - is shown by the above and similar-type comments, which equate difference in opinion with treason; the Bill of Rights was written to safeguard against these very same attitudes and consequent dictatorial actions on the part of our Government.
You should take a course in the basic construction of the country as found in the constitution: a giant and malfunctioning Swiss watch, which isn't supposed to espouse unified beliefs, but the competing interests of various groups, conflicting interpretations of law, inherent and human disagreements of all kinds. Out of this melting pot of conflict in government, the essence of freedom of the people lies, for no opinion of any one power can push out others. You would have it otherwise.
The country will not tolerate extremist views of guns in either form: those who would ban all guns, or those who would push out any restrictions on guns. Running around in a self-righteous/condemning celebration of a moderate legal decision is not the way to go. It misreads the court and the country, and the constitution. It will backfire on you.
Enjoy the decision in a healthy way like most of us are, but best not start the witch-fires or haul out the guillotines.
Last edited: