Slugthrower
New member
kcshooter, we have similar backgrounds as far as growing up on the wrong side of the tracks. Having lived the poor boy's life, it isn't easy. You are quite correct when you say, that when violence is required that it should be blindingly violent and without hesitation. You know as well as I do that guns aren't always the best means to put a person down. Sometimes one must get their hands bloody.
Col. Copper was indeed an intelligent man. Much of his writings are profound. This still gives no reason to place this man above all others. There are many others, such as Fairburn, Applegate, Skeeter, etc.
that are as qualified to advise people on the use of firearms in combat and their effectiveness. I am in no way detracting from Col. Cooper. I am not a man of one book or of one experience. There many ways to skin a cat. Cooper's methods are but one way. Limiting one's solutions to a myriad of situations from one man's philosophy is folly. Yes, it may upset some folks to know that some others do not worship any man. That would be their problem.
I wasn't a commissioned officer and wouldn't have wanted to be. If given the opportunity, I would have become a Warrant Officer, as their skills require a much more technical understanding than any general officer would most likely be capable of. Still, that is neither here nor there, as the Army wouldn't allow me to change MOS. The MOS I was in was a shortage MOS. Anyone that was an FO wasn't going to be able to change MOS period. So instead of getting screwed by the Army, I left them behind. No need to be used like a puppet.
My ASVAB was 98%, GT 129, in addition to having an IQ of 136 on a max 143 scale. Would you say that those numbers make me a dull kitchen knife? I could have chosen any MOS in the enlisted ranks, and possibly became a CWO. That is if the Army hadn't put me in the worst unit in the entire army. How did I learn that my unit was the worst? The Army Times reported it in one of their posts. Luck of the draw I suppose.
When it comes to officers, they come in many flavors, we had a Major, that barley spoke English, he kept trying to tell me how to operate the FBCB2 system in a particular manner that the system wasn't capable of. For some reason he thought that he knew more about it than a soldier that was trained in it's proper usage. I have seen far too many commissioned officers that were arrogant self import pricks, whom no one could convey to them their lack of understanding of a particular system and it's capabilities.
So pardon me when I speak of personal experiences with commissioned officers. I bet you would have loved to find out that when on a road march that your CO was marching with a ruck sack full of pillows, while yours was over 100 lbs. Seems that my CO wanted to appear as if he was leading by example. So yes, I have a problem with deceptive, self righteous, officers that push pencils and like to think that they are tough as nails, when the real soldiers are in the enlisted ranks. The best commissioned officers that I ever had the pleasure to operate under were those that came from the enlisted ranks. The officers that come from cadet schools tend to not be as good. I hope that answers your questions.
We may not all agree on the same philosophies, but we can agree that the POS, who was beating the old man, needed to have his skull caved in.
Col. Copper was indeed an intelligent man. Much of his writings are profound. This still gives no reason to place this man above all others. There are many others, such as Fairburn, Applegate, Skeeter, etc.
that are as qualified to advise people on the use of firearms in combat and their effectiveness. I am in no way detracting from Col. Cooper. I am not a man of one book or of one experience. There many ways to skin a cat. Cooper's methods are but one way. Limiting one's solutions to a myriad of situations from one man's philosophy is folly. Yes, it may upset some folks to know that some others do not worship any man. That would be their problem.
I wasn't a commissioned officer and wouldn't have wanted to be. If given the opportunity, I would have become a Warrant Officer, as their skills require a much more technical understanding than any general officer would most likely be capable of. Still, that is neither here nor there, as the Army wouldn't allow me to change MOS. The MOS I was in was a shortage MOS. Anyone that was an FO wasn't going to be able to change MOS period. So instead of getting screwed by the Army, I left them behind. No need to be used like a puppet.
My ASVAB was 98%, GT 129, in addition to having an IQ of 136 on a max 143 scale. Would you say that those numbers make me a dull kitchen knife? I could have chosen any MOS in the enlisted ranks, and possibly became a CWO. That is if the Army hadn't put me in the worst unit in the entire army. How did I learn that my unit was the worst? The Army Times reported it in one of their posts. Luck of the draw I suppose.
When it comes to officers, they come in many flavors, we had a Major, that barley spoke English, he kept trying to tell me how to operate the FBCB2 system in a particular manner that the system wasn't capable of. For some reason he thought that he knew more about it than a soldier that was trained in it's proper usage. I have seen far too many commissioned officers that were arrogant self import pricks, whom no one could convey to them their lack of understanding of a particular system and it's capabilities.
So pardon me when I speak of personal experiences with commissioned officers. I bet you would have loved to find out that when on a road march that your CO was marching with a ruck sack full of pillows, while yours was over 100 lbs. Seems that my CO wanted to appear as if he was leading by example. So yes, I have a problem with deceptive, self righteous, officers that push pencils and like to think that they are tough as nails, when the real soldiers are in the enlisted ranks. The best commissioned officers that I ever had the pleasure to operate under were those that came from the enlisted ranks. The officers that come from cadet schools tend to not be as good. I hope that answers your questions.
We may not all agree on the same philosophies, but we can agree that the POS, who was beating the old man, needed to have his skull caved in.