I finally hit the title, above. Do we need Hi-Capacity in everyday Carry?
As law-abiding citizens, in our everyday life?
Yes, lest we fail in our attempt at self defense for a lack of shooting back.
I finally hit the title, above. Do we need Hi-Capacity in everyday Carry?
As law-abiding citizens, in our everyday life?
The mid set seems to be "I (or "we") will now decide what the citizens can or should have."
As a retired scientist I only consider probability, not possibility. In theory nearly everything is "possible", but I cannot and will not dedicate brain time to everything that could possibly go wrong. Hence I only carry when the probability/consequence ratio pierces my threshold, which for me is rural walks and larger public places like movie theaters and malls.
As a retired scientist I only consider probability, not possibility.
Sometimes a POS has a friend, or friends.Opinions vary, of course. That being said, it's not going to be you against zombie hordes. It's going to be you against some POS looking to take you off. One or two rounds and you will be victorious or dead.
Lohman446 said:I might just possibly meet the Valkyries with an empty snub nosed revolver in my hand, looking around, and wondering how in the society I live in I could have used more than five shots and my desperation lock-blade knife. I'll be confused no doubt but it will have been what happens. Your fate is already decided you only get to chose how you will meet it and if this is my fate so be it.
So no. I do not need high capacity magazines. But the question was not singular in nature.
It's interesting, isn't it. It's also very human.I am surprised by the number of folks commenting regards comfort, appearance for their choice of firearms, and the belief that they can perceive or predict where bad things may happen to them.
I also lack the skill set to effectively use high capacity in most situations.