Man, this is just getting rediculous! All I said was "I decided that Glock is definately not for me." and there's three pages of why Glocks are better than 1911s...is it just me or are those two different topics in one thread?
Jsut to satisfy those here who can only plug their ears and shout "Glocks are best" at the top of their lungs, I'll say this: If I had to depend on a gun I'd never fired before to save my life, and I could only choose a Glock or a 1911, then YES I'd choose a Glock...if I could choose among all guns, I'd probably choose a revolver, in that scenario...BUT, since I don't have crazed maniacs running after me all the time, and I can choose a pitol that I LIKE, taking my time, and then see if it's reliable, and then carry it, then that's what I do. Does that make you happy guys? I doubt that there are many folks who carry unproven guns for protection...thos who do are fools. I am not a fool, and my 1911 has proven itself reliable, and I like shooting it, therefore, I carry it. One cannot have more than 100% reliability, and if I had to choose between a 100% Glock and a 100% 1911, I would choose the 1911, BECAUSE I LIKE IT! What's so friggin' hard to understand? I could care less about all you Glock people spouting about how good it is and how bad the 1911 is! If there were no 1911s, I choose a wheelgun, not a Glock. I won't post to this thread again, so go ahead and spout off all you want.