Would have been great. Except they were so great they only made them for a year or two it that! Maybe if they would have just called them something else, and never put the see through plastic side plate on it.Look into the Taurus View revolver(it was a 85 with a very small grip and short barrel, with a clear side plate, later changed to an aluminum one). That'd be a great size for a pocket revolver
I wear only cargo shorts in the Summer, cargo pants in the Winter (nothing else). My S&W Model 36 is undetectable my front-right standard seamed pocket in its Bianchi pocket holster. It rides so well that I am unaware that it is there. So, it would seem to be a matter of what kind of pants a person wears.You do have to test a revolvers actually as they are FAR more complicated than an auto.
I've shipped back 686s, GP100s, Taurus 66s. Binding. That also means I've owned those, so I don't dislike revolvers.
It's much worse than any auto failure because the gun can be done if you can't get the cylinder open and it won't rotate.
But to the OP question: no. Snubs in dress pants or normal fitted pants of a youth-middle aged man that doesn't buy big pants...just too big. They carry better than an auto in feel because the cylinder breaks up the shape, but the cylinder is so wide it's like a large cutie orange in your pocket. That's not realistic.
An LCP is way more comfortable.
debating whether it is possible to do something I have been doing daily for 22 years