Chuck Conners must hate Mossberg

Aw don't be so critical guys. With the rail they can mount their cleaning equipment, a back scratcher, a broom and dustpan......:D
 
Ive said this before, but I have been in a situation where this rifle would have been handy, I wouldnt have needed the crap forward of the reciever, but that adjustable butstock, would have been handy when my kids started deer hunting. 30 30 is my child training round, and Ive had to cut a stock or two to leinght before, and hated it.
I wouild like to have that butstock for a Winchester Model 94, You could alwayse take it off when the kids grown.
 
Call me old fashioned, but I believe 30-30s should have wood stocks. A beautiful stock is a work of art. That thing looks like a kitchen appliance.
 
Hey, some places aren't allowed semi autos. The lever rifle shoots pretty fast and this version would go a long ways toward appeasing those poor tactical deprived folk.
 
HKGuns said:
That just might be the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen.
Click to expand...

Obviously you haven't seen the other items from the Mossberg catalog....like their "chainsaw".

Mossberg-500-Chainsaw-1.jpg
 
My first response was unprintable. I'm a lever and wood kind of guy.
However, the more I see it the less repulsive it gets. I could see adding it to a collection as my 7th or 8th, but not the first.
However, it might get some young kid into the Cult of the Lever.
 
Not sure that low capacity meets my definition of "tactical".

Pistol rounds out of a 18'" rifle barrel work to 100 yards, give twice the cap, and are polite enough not to need the supressor. Think they got the caliber wrong.
 
Obviously you haven't seen the other items from the Mossberg catalog....like their "chainsaw".
Click to expand...

Oh GAWD.
No, you're right, I had no idea and I take back my previous post. The chainsaw handle on a shotgun just might be the stupidest thing I've ever seen. Pretty bad when your first impressions that these things are photo-shopped.

Who is running Mossberg these days?
 
Ok back in the day, let's say 80's, people wanted to be badasses. They were sorta nerdy, nothing wrong with that. A lot of the people were mistaken, thinking gun ownership would somehow get them into trouble. So, to cure the urge to be a badasses they proceeded to the local flea market and purchased; cheapo throwing stars, numchucks, blowguns, crappy crossbows and butterfly knifes. Some type of trenchcoat is required, along with boots with a buckle.

What the anti gunners unwittingly accomplished, is somehow they alerted a lot of these types of people to the fact that can actually own real guns. Because the gun to them, is the pinnacle of badassesness......that's the target customer of the 'chainsaw'.....
 
The Mossberg 500 Chainsaw is a breaching gun. The handle is situated to make door breaching easier because you can hold the fore stock from above.
Mossberg's intention was to build a serious breaching gun for police, but when sold to civilians (they'll sell anything to make payroll) who don't know the reason behind it's design it appears either "baddass" or "ridiculous", depending on your point of view.
 
The standard Mossberg 30-30 is pretty bad with the wood stock they put on them. That is actually an improvement. Doing it to a Winchester would just be wrong.
 
Well the breaching barrel is obvious, but how did breaching ever get accomplished without the handle? Any ways its hijacking the thread so ima gonna let it pass, they shoulda named it different.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top