ATF Project Gunrunner

This is new. It seems the BATFE is as incompetent as ever.

SOURCE

Congress asks for more info on bungled ATF operation in Milwaukee
By The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel January 31, 2013 1:29 pm

Members of Congress from both parties Wednesday called for an investigation into the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' storefront sting in Milwaukee, an operation plagued by problems such as an agent's machine gun being stolen and burglars ripping off $35,000 in merchandise.
 
Tom Servo wrote:

You may remember George Gillett. He was the #2 guy for the Phoenix field division during Fast & Furious, and he was castigated by Issa for "failure to ensure proper supervision."

Back around Thanksgiving, Mexican beauty queen Maria Susana Flores Gamez and five others were killed in Sinaola. Guns from Fast & Furious were found at the scene.

Interestingly enough, one of those was an FN FiveSeven pistol, which was traced directly back to Mr. Gillett. Now, by "directly," I mean directly.

Quote:
Gillett purchased the weapon at Legendary Arms, a Phoenix gun store. On the federal form 4473 used to buy the gun, Gillett used the ATF office address, 201 East Washington, and said "Apt 940." On subsequent purchase, Gillett used a commercial address, that of a strip mall.
Yep, he lied on the form. What's more, he claims he later sold the gun privately to someone over the internet. Naturally, neither Gillett or the ATF has any comment on the matter.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What have we here, another unprosecuted felony, courtesy of Obama et al, the AG is his appointee, when last I looked. Do as we say, not as we do, with the proverbial vengeance. Oh by the way, re this fiasco, where are the guardians of the public virtue, the vaunted members of The Fourth Estate, here known as "Media"and or the "free press", which by the way, is neither without cost or "free", meaning absent all manner of restrictions/special pleadings.
 
Re Jimpeel's 2719, it does seem to go on and on, doesn't it? Who might it be that will remain standing, when and if The Music Stops? One wonders.
 
I really really hope the truth can be dug out of this mess and all accountable get their day in court followed with years in federal prison.
 
The most shocking thing about the Fox article is the quote from Holder:

But I have to tell you that for me to really be affected by what happened, I'd have to have respect for the people who voted in that way (...) And I didn't, so it didn't have that huge an impact on me."

That's the Attorney General of the United States saying that he really doesn't mind being held in criminal contempt of Congress because he just doesn't respect the body that passed judgment.
 
The problem with the Attorney General being found in criminal contempt of Congress is that there's SFA Congress can do about it. They have no enforcement powers; that's the Executive Branch's territory. And Holder works for the Executive Branch.

Most that Congress can do is cut off funding, since they hold the purse strings.
 
I'm simply amazed that mediation is still on the table. Silly me, I thought once you subpoenaed something, you were past the point of negotiating over its production.
 
I'm simply amazed that mediation is still on the table. Silly me, I thought once you subpoenaed something, you were past the point of negotiating over its production.

Bingo!!!
i cant believe that Issa and Grassley are not all over this. One source refers to Holder's contempt citation as "hollow political theatre".
 
Hehe. Can they cut off his salary and medical insurance?
They can defund the entire [in]justice department if they want to. Since all spending bill must originate in the House, I don't think they even need the Senate's cooperation -- the House by itself might not be able to cut off funds already appropriated, but they could shut it down next budget cycle.

The thing is, Issa and Grassley are just posturing (if they meant business they would have acted a long time ago) and the rest of Congressional Republicans are just humoring them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Contrary to popular belief, the debacle over Fast & Furious is not dead.

From a report by David Workman in an Examiner article: What is president hiding about Fast & Furious?

David starts his column with:

A federal judge appointed by President Barack Obama may force him to turn loose of documents relating to Operation Fast and Furious, the scandalous gun trafficking sting that prompted a full blown investigation and hearings before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Then from the Chicago Tribune: Obama resists Republican bid to see gun smuggling operation documents

President Barack Obama is resisting a congressional subpoena for documents related to how the administration responded to the revelation of the failed operation known as "Fast and Furious" on the U.S.- Mexican border. It has already turned over thousands of pages of documents about the operation itself.

Justice Department lawyer Ian Gershengorn told a hearing the matter was best left to the give-and-take of the U.S. government's two elected branches, the president and Congress, and should not be a matter for the courts.

Also from The Washington Post: Judge skeptical of Justice Department’s bid to dismiss Congress’ lawsuit over Fast & Furious

Judge Amy Berman Jackson sharply challenged the department’s claim that federal courts have no jurisdiction in the dispute. Department lawyer Ian Gershengorn said the battle over the documents should be resolved by the checks and balances between the legislative and executive branches.

“I’m a check and balance,” countered Jackson, an appointee of President Barack Obama. “The third branch exists.”

We all know that the courts move slowly, so it's not a surprise that months later, we might have something come about in this case. What is surprising is that a Judge appointed by Obama appears to be really looking at this, in a way that might topple Obama's claims of executive privilege.
 
I'd been wondering if anything was ever going to crop up on this again. I'd sure like to see more action on it, but I am (quite frankly) just relieved that it isn't totally dead.
 
I'd been wondering if anything was ever going to crop up on this again

This article brings up the possibility that Dennis Burke could be disbarred...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...al-retaliated-against-furious-whistle-blower/

Another article, and a link to the report:

http://www.examiner.com/article/grassley-blasts-doj-treatment-of-gunwalking-whistleblower

http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/2013/s1305.pdf

It may be that with 3 scandals going - Benghazi, IRS and the AP scandal, that news agencies who glossed over this in years past will take a more serious look at what really happened. I think the administration and Holder especially has lost credibility, with the public but especially the media. Maybe the fact that the president claimed executive privilege will get more coverage...
 
IMO: Little, if anything, will ever be done about Operation Fast and Furious. After the election was over congress promptly forgot about F&F.
 
This article brings up the possibility that Dennis Burke could be disbarred...
I have a profound suspicion that Mr. Burke isn't the least bit concerned about losing his license to practice law. Wherever he does land, that landing will be made quite soft indeed as long as he keeps his mouth shut.
 
I suspect that if Burke is disbarred that will open the door to prosecution under the Whistleblower protection act. But I don't expect Eric (with)Holder to rush that prosecution or assign it to any truly competent attorney.
 
Back
Top