.44 mag self defense

Their is nothing wrong with the 44 magnum. People are buying snub nose scandium framed 44magnums and ruger is selling more then enough of their 454 alaskan snubs and sw even sells enough .500 sw magnum snubs to keep these products a normal production item.

i dont know if the recoil would be worse then a scandium jframe in 357 using a full power keith type load..... but it could not be that much more noticable.

as for capacity issues, people are happy with their 6 shot 32 acp semi auto, and with their 5 shot snub in 38 or 357. So dont start a capacity war.
 
Like other guns, it'll work with the right ammo selection.

I'd really like to see Ruger or S&W come out with a L-frame 5-shot .44Mag. I know Taurus makes one, but I have little confidence in their QC. It would make for an excellent hiking/CCW gun.
 
Central Florida court cases....

You could carry or use a .44magnum for self-protection & defend your actions in court but you'd need to be ready for it.

In another high profile criminal court case in central Florida(the "Bob Ward" trial), the jury requested to see the unloaded S&W .357magnum revolver in their deliberations. The jurors later convicted Ward on all charges.
Bob Ward was accused of shooting his wife in the face during a heated argument. He claimed his wife(the victim) fired the .357magnum revolver by accident. The ME report stated the victim had GSR(gunshot residue) on her eyes & Ward is on a recorded 911 line saying; "I just shot my wife!".

I think it's speculative & unfair to assume the GZ jurors would convicted him based on the use of a .44magnum revolver.
I agree that some jurors or those in the general public(USA) may be biased by media images or film/TV scenes but like the Ward jurors, not all are swayed & they can review the evidence presented to them in a fair manner.
 
The 44mag makes a fine SD weapon if you load to 900-1000 fps with a 200 gr bullet.
The light weight versions are far more comfortable with reduced loads for anything.
Stick to full loads for deer and other large creatures it does very well for that .Most if mine were at about 50 yds ,one shot kills ,iron sights.
 
Bob Ward was accused of shooting his wife in the face during a heated argument. He claimed his wife(the victim) fired the .357magnum revolver by accident. The ME report stated the victim had GSR(gunshot residue) on her eyes & Ward is on a recorded 911 line saying; "I just shot my wife!".

What does thing have to do with this discussion? The guy committed a murder.
 
I believe Detective Callahan carried .44 Spl with good reason. :D

For modern .44 Spl ammo, I'd get something in the 180-200 gr and ~400 ft-lbs range. Likewise, even in .357 Mag, the best overall practical SD rounds are probably in the <450 ft-lbs range and I think overall spectrum of ideal combat handgun rounds is about 350-500 ft-lbs. When far beyond 500 ft-lbs, there are usually substantial negatives...
 
For modern .44 Spl ammo, I'd get something in the 180-200 gr and ~400 ft-lbs range. Likewise, even in .357 Mag, the best overall practical SD rounds are probably in the <450 ft-lbs range and I think overall spectrum of ideal combat handgun rounds is about 350-500 ft-lbs. When far beyond 500 ft-lbs, there are usually substantial negatives...

The only negatives are if you lack the skill to use the magnum revolver effectively and you are unwilling to devote the time, energy and ammunition to achieve it. Noise, the 44 magnum comes in @ 159 Db same as the 357 magnum. Recoil? A steel 44 magnum recoils significantly less than a Scandium 357 magnum. Report and recoil are range issues, ask the man who killed the charging grizzley with a snubby 454 Casul if he noticed either. In a stressful life or death encounter you will not really notice either.

There is no logic to using a 44 special load in a 44 magnum for self defense. The 44 special and the 45 ACP are almost identical, if that is the power level you seek carry a 1911.

I have seen lots of people shot. The magnums perform significantly better. If you take the same bullet and move it faster it is more effective for self defense against humans. A perfect example is the 38 special VS the 357 Magnum.

The same load that works well for hunting large game is not optimum for self defense. Proper bullet selection is critical, especially with the 44 magnum. To thick of a jacket and the bullet does not react soon enough. The Remington bullets have a thinner jacket and the 180 grain Remington bullet operates similar to the 125 grain 357 magnum bullet only on a larger scale.

I don't always carry my 44 magnum, but when I do the last thing I am worried about is justifying my selection to a jury. Having spent a career in law enforcement and married to the same woman for over 30 years I seriously doubt I will be in a questionable shooting in the first place.
 
There is no logic to using a 44 special load in a 44 magnum for self defense. The 44 special and the 45 ACP are almost identical, if that is the power level you seek carry a 1911.

The logic is 1)you already have the .44, or 2) you don't like (or use well) the 1911 (or any autoloader).

Using a .44 special load, or slightly more, but less than a full house magnum is the most logical ammo for use in a .44 Magnum revolver for self defense purposes.
 
I might consider it in NY or some other place where full size magazines are illegal. Even then it would be well down on the list. When you have less ammo, being able to do more with what you have helps make up for it.
 
Using a .44 special load, or slightly more, but less than a full house magnum is the most logical ammo for use in a .44 Magnum revolver for self defense purposes.

I agree with the lighter load for defense. That is why I recommended the WW 210 grain Silvertip and the PMC Starfire, both are 3/4 loads.
 
If you want to carry a "44" for self defense, I suggest you go with the 44 spl. You simply don't need to power as a civilian for self defense. I personally would rather carry a 38spl and for what might be a once in a lifetime event, the 38spl is plenty.
 
Post #45, post #37....

My point about the Bob Ward case was related to post 37.
If you read the entire post, you see my remarks about the Ward case are to show that jurors can be fair & capable of reviewing the firearms in the trial without a bias or slant based on Hollywood movies or bad TV cop shows.

Clyde
 
Jurors can be fair and rational, but not necessarily. You may want to try reading your coffee cup at McDonald's.

In 1993 Rodney Peairs was tried for manslaughter in the killing of a japanese exchange student. Mr. Peairs used a .44 magnum and the issue of excessive force was raised by the japanese government and by the prosecution. In the closing arguments, the prosecutor described the gun as the "biggest handgun made by human beings" and not as a gun for self defense. I found this case with two clicks of my mouse. You can easily find other cases where the power of the .44 magnum is made into an issue by the prosecution or especially the news media (e.g. "a .44 magnum can stop a tank" and other absurdities). Mr Peairs was acquitted and in a criminal case the only issue should be whether deadly force was justified. However, in a civil wrongful death law suit, the rules are different and you can bet that the specter of excessive will be raised by the plaintiff's attorney in the hopes of increasing the amount of any judgement.

Of course, the first and only priority is to survive a life threatening situation, but after you have solved problem #1, there may be a problem #2 with either criminal and/or civil complications. Ask anyone who has been involved in a fatal shooting. I'm not saying this is right or fair. I'm just saying that the .44 magnum has a stigma and why needlessly inject those biases into the situation?
 
Nanuk said:
The only negatives are if you lack the skill to use the magnum revolver effectively and you are unwilling to devote the time, energy and ammunition to achieve it. Noise, the 44 magnum comes in @ 159 Db same as the 357 magnum. Recoil? A steel 44 magnum recoils significantly less than a Scandium 357 magnum. Report and recoil are range issues, ask the man who killed the charging grizzley with a snubby 454 Casul if he noticed either. In a stressful life or death encounter you will not really notice either.

These are precisely two of the big negatives I was talking about. My statement is unchanged. If someone is macho and skilled enough to use .44 Mag, why be so wimpy? Why not carry something in .480 Ruger with a 8" barrel? Who really wants to be able to hear in the future anyway?

Nanuk said:
There is no logic to using a 44 special load in a 44 magnum for self defense. The 44 special and the 45 ACP are almost identical, if that is the power level you seek carry a 1911.

I don't think it's very logical to use a .44 mag revolver for carry anyway. A 1911 would be a better choice.
 
Peairs incident....

It's important not to gloss over the details of these court cases that involve the .44magnum(or any other lethal force event involving firearms & armed citizens).
The Peairs incident took place in LA. A young exchange student who was going to a KISS rock concert went to the wrong door(Peairs house).

Startled by the young man's appearance & his limited English speaking ability, Peairs took out his hunting revolver, a loaded .44magnum which was close by. :eek:
He shot & killed the young exchange student during the confrontation which created a huge media stir & a international incident with Japan.

Author, legal use of force expert & tactics trainer: Massad Ayoob wrote a detailed account of the Peairs incident & the events were portrayed in a fictional episode of the 1990s crime drama; Homicide.

As noted, there are court cases where .44magnums, single action handguns, etc are used by the prosecutors or civil court action lawyers(see AZ vs Harold Fish). License holders & armed citizens should take that into account when selecting a defense sidearm. You wouldn't want your actions or choices to be viewed as reckless or irresponsible by a jury who is deciding your fate.

Clyde
 
IIRC, his wife was very scared, told him to get the gun and he foolishly went outside to challenge the poor kid.

Another reason for a modicum of stress related firearms training. Don't go looking for the BG unless there is a very compelling reason.
 
If you want to carry a "44" for self defense, I suggest you go with the 44 spl. You simply don't need to power as a civilian for self defense. I personally would rather carry a 38spl and for what might be a once in a lifetime event, the 38spl is plenty.

If you do not mind, what do you base this opinion on? I have seen lots of people shot with 38’s, it is quite a bit less than plenty.

My point about the Bob Ward case was related to post 37.

Bob Ward murdered his wife during a domestic dispute, obviously his defense is going to try any trick in the book.

I found this case with two clicks of my mouse.

Cherry pick thousands of cases and come up with 2 or 3 that meet your criteria, OK.

These are precisely two of the big negatives I was talking about. My statement is unchanged.

Recoil and blast are range issues.

If someone is macho and skilled enough to use .44 Mag, why be so wimpy? Why not carry something in .480 Ruger with a 8" barrel? Who really wants to be able to hear in the future anyway?

Has nothing to do with macho. It’s not about an 8” hunting revolver in a caliber nobody here is even talking about. You saw my snubby and are just trolling for a fight.

I don't think it's very logical to use a .44 mag revolver for carry anyway. A 1911 would be a better choice.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion that is why we are discussing it. The 1911 safely and reliably reaches a certain power level, the 44 snubby surpasses that power level by a significant margin. I do carry a 1911 on occasion but mostly a Glock.

It's important not to gloss over the details of these court cases that involve the .44magnum(or any other lethal force event involving firearms & armed citizens).

Smoke and mirrors by a crafty attorney. That just means when you walk in the door you better be prepared to call BS on him.

Startled by the young man's appearance & his limited English speaking ability, Peairs took out his hunting revolver, a loaded .44magnum which was close by. He shot & killed the young exchange student during the confrontation which created a huge media stir & a international incident with Japan.

What was the threat posed by the young rocker? I have a hard time seeing this as a legitimate case of self defense even though he was not convicted.

As noted, there are court cases where .44magnums, single action handguns, etc are used by the prosecutors or civil court action lawyers(see AZ vs Harold Fish). License holders & armed citizens should take that into account when selecting a defense sidearm. You wouldn't want your actions or choices to be viewed as reckless or irresponsible by a jury who is deciding your fate.

Cylde,

Once the event has risen to the deadly force level the only time force is “excessive” is if the situation de-escalates to the point where deadly force is no longer authorized. Deadly force is the ultimate, once authorized it does not matter legally whether you use a knitting needle or a B-52.

I understand that you worship Mas, he is a great guy. I spent a career as an LEO in multiple jurisdictions and prosecuted many cases successfully. I have been in front of dozens of grand juries and juries in court. There are many factors that influence a jury, not just the negatives as I stated before you just need to be prepared to counter smoke and mirrors with facts, as you should anyway.

So in a nutshell, the total stigma of the 44 magnum is tied to Dirty Harry a movie made in 1971 a 40 year old movie?

I would say that it has evolved since then. As with anything you tailor your carry load to the intended use. I am not going to carry a low powered ineffectual cartridge because I am afraid of the fairy prosecutor. I guess if I lived in a place where the mere act of self defense was viewed as a crime, I would either evolve my thought process or move.

Too many gun toters see the gun as the only tool, when in fact it is the last tool you should reach for.

As I said before I do not carry a 44 magnum every day, it is just not practical for that. It is not illegal to do so, nor is it illegal to carry reloads, in the 44 magnum it may be a good thing to carry loads that are 1/2 way between a 44 special and a full power load with the proper projectile.
 
Flawed...

There are a few flaws throughout post #58.
I'm not going to poke holes or pull threads. The TFLer is entitled to their view(s), Id just say we have very different opinions on this topic. ;)

CF
 
There are a few flaws throughout post #58.
I'm not going to poke holes or pull threads. The TFLer is entitled to their view(s), Id just say we have very different opinions on this topic.

I thought that was the point of discussion? I have been pretty open about how I came to my conclusions. I just ask others to do the same, It is interesting how we come to drastically different conclusions if looking at the same set of facts.
 
Back
Top