zombie-themed guns/ammo: fun or legal liability??

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know of no other rifle that is more traditional than the 5.56 semi-only AR's. Heck, just about every issue of American Rifleman features one of these on its cover now!

In the book, wasting huge amounts of ammo was a big problem, America was in shambles because of the usual politics caused a delay on acting until it was too late... The rifles were a cheap wood stock rifle because of lack of resources and manufacturing capability.....

Zombie fan or not, this book is an interesting read.
 
So how many of those that believe "get some" or "born to kill" displayed on a self defense firearm would actually have significant impact on a trial have done the opposite??

You know peace signs and pictures of tulips and daisies?

You don't want to spot the other side points but want to stack the deck in your favor right?

I've never added any such items, pictures, special finishes to any of my guns for the simple reason that when you do you decrease your potential buyers market if and when it's ever sold.
 
fire4606 raises an interesting corollary. Maybe we could all gain a modicum of legal safety by carrying pink guns decked out in hearts and emblazoned with a shiny unicorn emblem...
 
Red Baron Red...

I considered buying a new unfired Charter Arms .44 Bulldog DA only revolver then having a local DuraCoat treat it with "German Red". I call the shade; Red Barron red. :D
I for 1 won't knock all custom gun work or coatings/treatments.
If it protects the firearm or adds interest to it then it may increase the value.

Clyde
PS; Im also fond of the Harley-Davidson orange Duracoat. :cool:
 
So how many of those that believe "get some" or "born to kill" displayed on a self defense firearm would actually have significant impact on a trial have done the opposite??

You know peace signs and pictures of tulips and daisies?

"Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, ask yourself why this sick, twisted individual paid hundreds of dollars to paint pictures of peace signs and daisies on this instrument of death. Did he have delusions of enforcing his brand of peace by snuffing the victim out? Did he think he was the notorious hippie, Charles Manson, executing those whom he deemed bad for society? His kind of society? We don't know what goes on in the killer's mind, but what we do know is that he does not take a fellow person's life a serious matter. Just look at this gun - obviously, in the killer's mind, it's not just a tool for self-defense. It's something much more, otherwise he wouldn't have adorned it the way he did...."
 
What if it's a gift from someone? Say, for example, a father for whatever reason, gets his daughter a 'Hello Kitty' or just a plain old pink painted, AR15 and she is forced to use it one day for self defense. Couldn't she just claim it was a gift, and the design and graphics on her gun, in no way reflected her intentions with the firearm, she just liked the color.

What about a chrome, versus black, versus gold plated, versus camo painted, versus pink, versus green, painted firearms. Which one's are the jury going to decide is 'worse?'

Couldn't you argue, "that's what they had at the store" or "That's what I found astatically pleasing, and it in no way influences my intentions of how and when to use my firearm."

Where do you draw the line?
 
You are assuming that the gun appearance is brought up in such a manner that the defendant is on the stand and asked to explain the zombie ammo or pink gun.

When the gun is presented into evidence and shown to the jury - you may get negative ideation. The DA may not may a histronic speech but just show the gun.

Thus, do you want your defense attorney to bring up the issue? That might just suggest it was a bad choice. and you are making excuses.
 
Think pink...

I wouldn't take any issue with a pink, teal, purple or peach colored weapon if a woman used it.
Women like pink & wear/use it often.
My friend, a retired Hollywood stunt performer & film industry stunt co-ordinatior got a pink Hogue rubber grip for his wife's S&W .357magnum.
If she shot a car-jacker or a rapist, I don't think the pink grip would even come up.

CF
 
Not to thread hi-jack, but what on earth would be the problem of using a
10mm gun as an EDC piece?

I mean the FBI used to issue it.
 
Posted by JD0x0: Couldn't she just claim it was a gift, and the design and graphics on her gun, in no way reflected her intentions with the firearm, she just liked the color.

Couldn't you argue, "that's what they had at the store" or "That's what I found astatically pleasing, and it in no way influences my intentions of how and when to use my firearm."
The subject will not become a subject for discussion unless the defense attorney puts the defendant on the stand and introduces the subject by asking questions. That would open the issue for cross examination, and it would not be a good idea.

The damage is done when the state introduces the firearm or ammunition into evidence and when the state's investigators describe same by model name and/or trademark, and if applicable, describe any custom modifications. Details can be shown on flat screens. The prosecutor can also make something of the choices in closing arguments.

What about a chrome, versus black, versus gold plated, versus camo painted, versus pink, versus green, painted firearms. Which one's are the jury going to decide is 'worse?'

Where do you draw the line?
Who knows? Dr. Meyer's jury simulations tell us that modern military style black rifles and pistol grip shotguns can influence juries negatively. The literature also tells us that certain kinds of ammunition can be problematical.

Anything beyond that requires speculation.
 
SPEMack618 said:
Not to thread hi-jack, but what on earth would be the problem of using a 10mm gun as an EDC piece?

I mean the FBI used to issue it.
Google Arizona v. Harold Fish

You get things like:
A retired schoolteacher whose hobby was hiking is accused of killing an unarmed man, a total stranger, just seconds after they met on the same hiking trail. The question is why?
The firearms investigator said that Fish’s gun — a 10mm — is more powerful than what police officers use and is not typically used for personal protection. And the ammunition Fish used to shoot Kuenzli three times, called “a hollow-point bullet,” is made to expand when it enters the body.
Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/15199221/ns/dateline_nbc-crime_reports/t/trail-evidence/
 
Skans said:
"Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, ask yourself why this sick,...
JD0x0 said:
...Couldn't you argue,...
ClydeFrog said:
...I don't think the pink grip would even come up.
What none of you seem to be able to grasp is how this all can happen at a trial. It's not necessarily a matter of the prosecutor making comments. And any embellishments on the gun will "come up" quite naturally.

The gun will be entered as evidence. At various times it will be displayed to the jury, and the members of the jury will have an opportunity multiple times to get a good look at it.

The gun will most likely be shown to one of the investigating officers arriving at the scene during the course of his testifying about the preliminary investigation. He will then identify it as the gun that was in the possession of the defendant and which he secured.

The gun will also most likely be shown to the jury and to the Firearms and Tool Mark Examiner who will be testifying about his examination of the gun and quite possibly his confirmation by ballistic tests that it was the gun used.

Through all of this process the jury has a chance to observe the pink grips or the Punisher grips or the "Born to Kill" engraved on the slide. Maybe the investigating officer and/or the Firearms and Tool Marks Examiner will be asked about any unique identifying characteristics of the gun, giving him a chance to mention the pink grips or the Punisher grips or the "Born to Kill" engraved on the slide.

So the prosecutor doesn't have to say anything about the pink grips or the Punisher grips or the "Born to Kill" engraved on the slide. The members of the jury will know that they are there and be able to think about the person who has such embellishments on his gun and what it might mean about that person.

Of course if the defendant's lawyer comments on the pink grips or the Punisher grips or the "Born to Kill" engraved on the slide, that calls the jury's attention to those embellishments.

Dr. Meyer understands how these things are done, which is why he wrote:
Glenn E. Meyer said:
...When the gun is presented into evidence and shown to the jury - you may get negative ideation. The DA may not may a histronic speech but just show the gun.

Thus, do you want your defense attorney to bring up the issue? That might just suggest it was a bad choice. and you are making excuses.
 
The gun will also most likely be shown to the jury...
This came up at the TX Bar Continuing Legal Education Seminar and the consensus was that it would be very difficult to keep the gun or pictures of it from being shown to the jury.
 
Legally, I think the focus in a court case will be on the facts NOT the color on the ammo and firearms. If these are brought in as evidence that is probably a sign that the real facts of the case are sketchy and the attorney is grasping at straws.

I imagine the judge's gavel would come down hard to stop the snickering the minute the word "zombie" is brought up in court.

Pico

I didn't read the entire thread, but I'd echo what Pico posted above.

I like Zombie/SHTF movies and shows for entertainment, But that's where it ends. I don't buy any of the actual related product and In the same way I don't put any firearm related stickers or decorations in my home or vehicle. Its all marketing and hype, same as duracoated firearms or Hello Kitty guns. They all try to attract a certain type of customer and also upsell the product.

To me, that is all--plain and simple.
 
Posted by Justice06RR: I didn't read the entire thread, but I'd echo what Pico posted above.
I hate to put it quite this way, but had you read some of the discussion, you might have learned something. One who understands how juries work would not so "echo."

The gun will be "brought in as evidence"; the jury will see it, and form opinions.

Might I suggest that you take a moment to read Posts 33, 39, 42, 48, 75, 81, 95, 109, and 114, and then decide.
 
The weapon will be shown on a blown-up poster board to make it as scary as possible....
Every drop of blood.
Probably the victims naked body.
 
Nobody is saying that you should allow yourself to be killed if you're attacked by an axe-wielding zombie while holding a 10mm pistol with Punisher grips, a barrel that says "Hippies watch for flash" around the crown, and loaded with handloads. However, that doesn't mean that choosing that pistol as part of your EDC package is the wisest choice you could make. Juries are influenced by a lot of different factors, some of which may seem trivial. Ever notice the differences between a booking shot, and the way a defendant appears at trial? Appearances make a difference to juries.

When I see threads like this (legal liability based on the appearance of a firearm, or modifications to a firearm, or the ever-popular handloads vs. factory loads), I keep coming back to the same thought: Prepare for a legal fight the same way that you would prepare for a gunfight. Hope for the best. Prepare for the worst. Eliminate the variables where possible. Don't spot the opposition any points.

Good points. We have to remember we're talking an SD scenario here, not your favorite range or hunting piece. That limits a lot of the Zombie stuff as CC pieces and nightstand guns don't have as much of that, that I can tell.
 
The vast majority of handguns owned by civilians aren't carried in public...
So, It could be pretty rare that a zombie themed gun is actually carried legally... Now, if it was used away from the home in a self defense scenario and goes to trial, something went wrong or you live in the wrong jurisdiction... For someone decided that your self defense shooting wasn't justified....
Here, the most I've seen is it gets to the grand jury and is dropped... One case was questionable in abilene, because it started as road rage, and ended up a collision. One guy pulled a gun, the other guy went back to his car got in, then came back out with a pistol and killed the other driver... He got 70yrs.

If you use any weapon in your home against an aggressor who has entered your home and you get sent to trial..... Well, something has gone wrong with the system- zombie gun, or not.

Either way, if you end up in trial, I don't think having used a zombie gun will help your case.
You could get lucky and have some rational persuasive jurors that see it as decoration only.

Juries are like any sampling of the population. You will have a mix of rational people and emotionally guided people. A leader or group of leaders will emerg and most of the rest will follow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top