Your moral obligation to help innocents at risk?

I believe that "to see evil being done, and then do nothing, is no better that to have done the evil yourself." If I saw someone being mugged/raped/murdered, and did nothing, I would be resonsible for that crime. I will try to do anything I can. If there is any chance that by taking an action, an innocent victim can be saved, I will do my best to complete that action. Regardless of the risk. Maybe this is just a reaction to the possibility of having to live with myself after doing nothing. I was in a situation (turned out OK) not too long ago where I could have been responsible for other peoples deaths/injuries (and for a moment believed I was), so I can imagine how that must feel. It's not pretty.

Plus the fact that I can never quite accept that the knight vs dragon myths were only fairy tales.
 
Society and times have changed. There is another thread in this fourm regarding the likes of John Wayne, Glen Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Audie Murphy etc. All past hero's to viewers and fans, they always did the right thing regardless of outcome or cost. They portrayed real men who had principles and values that were put above anything else. Hero's to our youth that were only equal to their fathers, both installed morals and pride in being a man. Todays era has different heros and different messages. Its the "me first" generation and do unto others before they do to you. Todays heros are portrayed by rappers, badboys and the Bill Clintons. The dads are also fading away, the base is crumbling and being replaced with political correctness.
Its sad, you can still find some that carry on the old values, actually thats why I'm here at TFL. Most here seem to still have it.

kenny b
 
There are quite a few factors that influence prosocial behavior and altruism. Most chest poundings and calls for moral authority are not really based in what we know about intervention.

I'm away from my resources, but I'll break it down for you later this week. We discussed this intensively at the NTI and in follow up discussions.

It's not simple but it's easy to be a tough guy on the Internet.
 
Having been raised in a Quaker family (not Friends; they shunned us) I was taught the full teachings of Mr Fox.

"Thee shall not cause harm to another person; nor shall thee allow harm to come to another person."

This statement has been my guiding principle in serving in the military, acting as under-cover, setting up and operating neighborhood watch units and going armed in public. It has taken a lot of the doubt and confusion out of my life.

Pops
 
FIRST you have to take care of yourself (and your family if they are involved). THEN you can take care of others in need - mabye.

Rushing in to save someone and then you too becoming a victim didn't do any good and did do lots of harm. This is the same sort of thing that happens with workers caught in a pipe that has poison gas. One worker goes down in the pipe and falls unconcious, then another goes down to get him and becomes unconcious, and another goes down and so on. This happens regularly in real life, even though pipeline workers are trained against it happening.

If you are in a situation where you can save someone because you have a gun and he/she doesn't, make damn sure you aren't going to just add to the victim list.

Going to the rescue is a strong instinctive response built into us for survival of the tribe; from the bad old days when each tribe was small and each individual in the tribe was dependent on the other tribe individuals for their own personal survival. It is as strong as the fight or flight response. It made sense then, it does not make sense now. Our survival is not threatened by the loss of a strangers life. Except between soldiers in a war.

What was a survival necessity has now become a romanticized heroic act. Mostly it is a harmless act, but some people will rush in to save someone, and lose their own lives.

Just don't be one of those. Otherwise save as many as you can and bask in the good feeling it brings you.
 
Nobody Has An Obligation To help Anyone Unless Asked And Excepted!

Joab, I understand all of the strong gentlemen in your family. My father and I both served down range in a military conflict. Our obligation was to the US Army and to this nation not to some stranger in the street. Yes people in Vietnam and the people in Iraq my father and I had to deal with were strangers. Do I feel I am obligated to the people of Iraq? No, I am obligated to the Military, my nation and the military contract I signed and I promised to up hold. I carry my pistol religiously when I go out and it is for my family and my protection. Not to say under certain circumstances would I help others like if a woman was getting raped and was screaming for help or if I was in a convenient store looking to get a coffee and some scum bag came in to rob the place, because my life is in danger in that situation too, I would not hesitate one second to put two into a robbers chest in a hold up if I was there.
Now what I mean by not getting involved in certain situation’s say I just arrived to a convenient store and the robber was running out of the store with money and his weapon, No way in hell would I try to raise my weapon on him. I would get a good description of him and wait to the police arrived to assist them. Another example of not getting involved is you folks probably heard the story of a guy stabbing a lady in Walmart and a man with a CCW shooting him to save her. He never should have shot the guy. If I was in that situation I would scream for him to stop or even ran to get help. Only way I would draw at him is if her came at me with that knife. My only problem with that situation is why was he stabbing that lady in Walmart? The guy that shot this man felt he was doing the right think but lets think what if this guy was so mad because of what happened between him and this woman. Say this woman, killed his wife or even tortured and raped his daughter tell me you wouldn’t be so mad you would chase this woman down in Walmart and stab her. I am in now way condoning violence against another human being but my point is you should not get involved in any situation unless you are some how involved. I am not in any way obligated to help anyone. Especially if I don’t know the story behind what is going on or even asked to help. I would help anyone who asked me for it. Now if I was walking and I saw a person shoot another in cold blood would I get involved? Hell no, I would get a description of the shooter and help the Police. Just like Soldiers, LEO’s too have any obligation and that is to protect and serve the people in the community. Now for all of us who are not one of them, I believe they are the only people out there who are supposed to prevent crime even off duty. So let the LEO’s for fill their obligation and don’t try to be some hero. All the great hero’s I know are the dead one’s
 
Society and times have changed. There is another thread in this fourm regarding the likes of John Wayne, Glen Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Audie Murphy etc. All past hero's to viewers and fans, they always did the right thing regardless of outcome or cost. They portrayed real men who had principles and values that were put above anything else. Hero's to our youth that were only equal to their fathers, both installed morals and pride in being a man. Todays era has different heros and different messages. Its the "me first" generation and do unto others before they do to you. Todays heros are portrayed by rappers, badboys and the Bill Clintons. The dads are also fading away, the base is crumbling and being replaced with political correctness.
Click to expand...

Amen.
 
Now I understand

When Fascism took over Germany they selectively and one at a time took groups out of the population. Gypsies, Jews, Poles etc. etc. The German citizen said "It's not me and not my fight".

I didn't expect that lesson to be brought home to me in the USA as a general response even on an individual basis.

Older and wiser than I wanted to be.
 
There is another thread in this fourm regarding the likes of John Wayne, Glen Ford, Jimmy Stewart, Audie Murphy etc. All past hero's to viewers and fans, they always did the right thing regardless of outcome or cost.
Click to expand...
Movie heros? You present movie heros for examples? Outside of war (Audie was a real life war hero), and war situations are not the discussion in this thread, these were movie heros. Come on, real life here...

For every story of a real life hero that rescued a stranger from harm, how many are there where the real life wannabe hero screwed up things worse?

You need to be careful in real life situations that you don't screw things up and cause even more damage than would have been done otherwise. When I went through basic training they were always telling us how John Wayne would do it in the movies, then showing us how to do it in real life situations.

If you walk into a 7-11 at 2am and it is being held up, movie heros aren't what you need to be thinking of. You need to be thinking of getting out of there alive so that you can continue to take care of your own family.

When Fascism took over Germany they selectively and one at a time took groups out of the population. Gypsies, Jews, Poles etc. etc. The German citizen said "It's not me and not my fight".
I didn't expect that lesson to be brought home to me in the USA as a general response even on an individual basis.
Click to expand...
Holy Cow! People who don't immediately rush into to help crime victims are guilty of the same crimes as the Nazis in the Holocaust!!!!! :eek: Where in the world did that comparison come from? That is so far over the top that it is bordering on comedy!
 
If morality is relative, the guy raping your wife isn't doing anything wrong.

Movie heros distill into a single mythical character the attributes that society deems heroic. Nobody expects anyone to behave exactly like John Wayne, any more than a Christian would really be expected to behave EXACTLY like Jesus... they are merely expected to try their best. Heros of whatever origin; movie, myth, or religion are heros for a reason. Society believes them to be an example of how to live the values the society holds as important.

Disclination to act when another is in need arises from 2 fears: the fear of death and the fear of inconvienience. Two questions that pop into the mind of any potential aid giver are: How much of my time and trouble is this going to take? Am I going to get hurt?

Those who fail to act because of the answer to the first are selfish, those who fail to act because of the second suffer from cowardice.
 
Disclination to act when another is in need arises from 2 fears: the fear of death and the fear of inconvienience. Two questions that pop into the mind of any potential aid giver are: How much of my time and trouble is this going to take? Am I going to get hurt?

Those who fail to act because of the answer to the first are selfish, those who fail to act because of the second suffer from cowardice.
Click to expand...

And those who act foolishly are fools.
 
Admittedly I didn't read any of the previous posts.

My .02.

I'll evaluate the situation. We can never know if a BG is going to USE his lethal force of if it's just a threat. And, in the instant that the BG decides to shoot, it may be too late.

I can't in good conscious let an innocent be killed. Besides, if the BG kills one person, he may decide to execute everyone to kill the witnesses.

If I can safely come to the rescue of someone, on my best guess, I'll do it as best as possible.

And, think about it, you or your loved ones may someday be the "innocent at risk." You would want someone to come to your rescue.
 
The original poster is paraphrasing from Pastor Martin Niemoeller. His bio is pasted below, courtesy of jewishvirtuallibrary.com. The quote is pasted first. It is neither over the top, nor is it comedy:

“First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”

Martin Niemoeller was a Protestant pastor born January 14, 1892, in Lippstadt, Westphalia. He was a submarine commander in World War I. He was anti-communist and initially supported the Nazis until the church was made subordinate to state authority.

In 1934, he started the Pastors’ Emergency League to defend the church. Hitler became angered by Niemoeller’s rebellious sermons and popularity and had him arrested on July 1, 1937. He was tried the following year and sentenced to seven months in prison and fined.

After his release, Hitler ordered him arrested again. he spent the next seven years in concentration camps in “protective custody.“ He was liberated in 1945 and was elected President of the Protestant church in Hesse and Nassau in 1947. He held the title until 1964. He was also a President of the World Council of Churches in the 1960’s.

Niemoeller was a pacifist who spoke out against nuclear weapons. He is best known for his powerful statement about the failure of Germans to speak out against the Nazis:

“First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”

He died in Wiesbaden on March 6, 1984.


When Fascism took over Germany they selectively and one at a time took groups out of the population. Gypsies, Jews, Poles etc. etc. The German citizen said "It's not me and not my fight".
Click to expand...
I didn't expect that lesson to be brought home to me in the USA as a general response even on an individual basis.

Holy Cow! People who don't immediately rush into to help crime victims are guilty of the same crimes as the Nazis in the Holocaust!!!!! Where in the world did that comparison come from? That is so far over the top that it is bordering on comedy!
Click to expand...
 
Disclination to act when another is in need arises from 2 fears: the fear of death and the fear of inconvienience. Two questions that pop into the mind of any potential aid giver are: How much of my time and trouble is this going to take? Am I going to get hurt?
Click to expand...

Not always. My personal favorite for just walking away is, drum roll please.

"They pretty much deserved it."

Most serious violence that I see is between equally reprehensible people and I usually walk away whistling a tune and hoping it turns out fatal. For both of them.

That said, I almost always at least verbally intervene in lopsided actions like mothers shaking their kids and boyfriends slapping their girlfriends around. So far I can't remember a time when I thought I needed to actively interven tosave someone's life that was worthwhile.

What's the penalty for sliding knives across the floor of a nighclub when bangers start punching each other out?
 
For every story of a real life hero that rescued a stranger from harm, how many are there where the real life wannabe hero screwed up things worse?
Click to expand...

I don't know - you tell me?

You need to be careful in real life situations that you don't screw things up and cause even more damage than would have been done otherwise. When I went through basic training they were always telling us how John Wayne would do it in the movies, then showing us how to do it in real life situations.
Click to expand...

Where I went through BT, they told us that as [semi-]trained armed individuals and soldiers it was our duty to 'resolve violent incidents through the use of your marksmanship and other skills.'
 
“First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists, but I was neither, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me.”
Click to expand...
This thread did not start out to be, nor did it appear intended to be, about the Nazis taking the Jews to the death camps. It was, I believe, intended to be about an individual finding himself (herself?) in a situation where an unarmed person might be rescued because the individual had taken the time and effort to arm himself/herself legally - and did he/she then owe some allegiance to every perosn out there that had not taken the time and effort to do the same. How you have managed to drag the Nazis and the Holocaust into this is beyond my comprehension.

Quote:
For every story of a real life hero that rescued a stranger from harm, how many are there where the real life wannabe hero screwed up things worse?
Click to expand...



I don't know - you tell me?
Click to expand...
I wish I could find statistics on this, but I doubt it there are any kept. From personal observation of over 52 years now, I have watched people screw things up far more often than making things better ~ even in non-lethal situations. My take on it is that most people will make things worse, which means that most of the time the best thing to do is probably nothing - every situation of course has it's own parameters, and in this thread no specific scenario was offered.

Where I went through BT, they told us that as [semi-]trained armed individuals and soldiers it was our duty to 'resolve violent incidents through the use of your marksmanship and other skills.'
Click to expand...
I went through Basic Training and Infantry Advanced Individual Training and never once heard that phrase. Basic Training was designed to teach basic skills and survival techniques IN A COMBAT SITUATION, as in how to shoot straight and keep your head and butt down too. AIT was training in advanced weaponry and markmanship and tactics IN A COMBAT SITUATION, never heard those words, or words to that effect in either training course. It was follow orders, shoot straigtht and always watch your own sector of fire.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top