pythagorean
Moderator
If you have ever bought a "used" gun it could have been a "suicide gun" or some other.
As far as I have been able to tell it is quite possible to buy a "used gun" that was used to commit suicide. Perhaps in crime of other sorts as well.
When the "used gun" becomes an entertaining investment we want to know the history. Well, I do at the very least. So I ask the shop owner or clerk the "story" behind the "used gun" I am interested in. Usually it is some widow that had no fancy for guns and so she decides to sell out "his" collection after he passed. Or some other innocent endeavor.
Well, concerning buying a "suicide gun" I am a bit averted--but I also know the real tale would not be explicated by the seller! In these circumstances one has to look at the gun for marks of legal processing for crime or other. I know how to do that.
But, let us say, you have the opportunity to buy a Third Reich Luger or a Russian Kalishnakov or other most likely to oppose the forces you happen to have been aligned with. Do you assign an evil stigma to the gun or do you appreciate the gun?
Some years ago 60 Minutes or some other show was asking questions (pointed) of a man owning 100s of WWI and WWII Lugers (P-08)--his name was Shattuck. It was interesting to me that he was a collector of the P-08 and he actually stood behind his armory of P-08s saying it was "part of history."
He also appreciated the design.
So: Where do you draw the line on a handgun if it has questionable history to its use?
Do you feign away or partially appreciate or fully appreciate the weapon?
I confess the P-08 to me is a handgun to remember. Especially if it was from WWI or WWII in the hand of the "enemy."
S/42 Mauser 1937 9mm Luger. All matching parts except for the magazine.
As far as I have been able to tell it is quite possible to buy a "used gun" that was used to commit suicide. Perhaps in crime of other sorts as well.
When the "used gun" becomes an entertaining investment we want to know the history. Well, I do at the very least. So I ask the shop owner or clerk the "story" behind the "used gun" I am interested in. Usually it is some widow that had no fancy for guns and so she decides to sell out "his" collection after he passed. Or some other innocent endeavor.
Well, concerning buying a "suicide gun" I am a bit averted--but I also know the real tale would not be explicated by the seller! In these circumstances one has to look at the gun for marks of legal processing for crime or other. I know how to do that.
But, let us say, you have the opportunity to buy a Third Reich Luger or a Russian Kalishnakov or other most likely to oppose the forces you happen to have been aligned with. Do you assign an evil stigma to the gun or do you appreciate the gun?
Some years ago 60 Minutes or some other show was asking questions (pointed) of a man owning 100s of WWI and WWII Lugers (P-08)--his name was Shattuck. It was interesting to me that he was a collector of the P-08 and he actually stood behind his armory of P-08s saying it was "part of history."
He also appreciated the design.
So: Where do you draw the line on a handgun if it has questionable history to its use?
Do you feign away or partially appreciate or fully appreciate the weapon?
I confess the P-08 to me is a handgun to remember. Especially if it was from WWI or WWII in the hand of the "enemy."
S/42 Mauser 1937 9mm Luger. All matching parts except for the magazine.