I say Rudy would, here's why....
First, none of these people would ever personally TRY to come and take our guns. They would have to send armed men willing to take on that dangerous task for them. How much is a LE officer's, soldier's, etc job worth to him. Attempting to pull off a national "turn in all your guns now or face deadly force" would open a bottomless can of worms. But I think we understand what was meant by the poll question. And I also assume it meant who as president.
Clinton and Obama would be very likely push AWBs, waiting periods, bulk ammo purchase bans, and the like. I don't think either would attempt a mass confiscation due to Obama not having the guts and Hillary not wanting to risk the backlash.
I'd see Rudy being the one to declare martial law over a supposed national security or terrorism situation. Gun ban being part of it. Easier to get more help from forementioned armed men when it is for our supposed protection rather than someone's grand social engineering scheme.
I realize there is a potenial for any president to abuse his power in such a way. However the Constitution does require that someone fill that spot and I'll gladly take my chances with Ron over Rudy, Clinton, or Obama.
First, none of these people would ever personally TRY to come and take our guns. They would have to send armed men willing to take on that dangerous task for them. How much is a LE officer's, soldier's, etc job worth to him. Attempting to pull off a national "turn in all your guns now or face deadly force" would open a bottomless can of worms. But I think we understand what was meant by the poll question. And I also assume it meant who as president.
Clinton and Obama would be very likely push AWBs, waiting periods, bulk ammo purchase bans, and the like. I don't think either would attempt a mass confiscation due to Obama not having the guts and Hillary not wanting to risk the backlash.
I'd see Rudy being the one to declare martial law over a supposed national security or terrorism situation. Gun ban being part of it. Easier to get more help from forementioned armed men when it is for our supposed protection rather than someone's grand social engineering scheme.
I realize there is a potenial for any president to abuse his power in such a way. However the Constitution does require that someone fill that spot and I'll gladly take my chances with Ron over Rudy, Clinton, or Obama.