Who still use the 32 .for carry

There must be a story behind that comment. What problem did you have with their customer service?
Never worked with Kel Tec CS before, but have heard that they can be slow and sometimes not fix issues and have to send back multiple times. With NAA it seems like you send something back one time and it comes back perfect.
 
I have only got one gut buster, a PP 32acp. I'm sure it will do the job if needed.
Lucky to live in a low crime and rural area. I've always got gun at hand a large
caliber revolver. More for opportunity at Varmits or targets than SD.
 
Occasionally I carry a prewar PPK however since the .380’s have become so diminutive I normally rely on one of the Micro’s today. I would carry a Star SI except they are bigger and heavier than the previously mentioned Micro’s. I have more than a dozen .32/7.65 pistols and enjoy shooting them often.
 
I used to carry .32 acp around town (and .45 acp in the woods). It's long since become obsolete for my personal carry needs. Between heaps of high-quality, light-weight options in 9mm and the advent of .327 Federal, I just have no need for it.

I still have one friend who carries an old Walther PP. It's cool but it takes up an awful lot of real estate for a very modest amount of firepower.
 
I carry my NAA Guardian 32acp for my work carry. Its flat and easy to carry in my pocket and goes unnoticed.
 
I worked for kel tec for 20+ years .
Most of the problems were operator error .
The p32 you would get rim lock ..
Or limp wristing due to the gun light weight.
I RETIRED IN 2016 .
If you do a fluff and buff .it solves most of kel tecs problems .
 
TruthTellers said:
Never worked with Kel Tec CS before, but have heard that they can be slow and sometimes not fix issues and have to send back multiple times. With NAA it seems like you send something back one time and it comes back perfect.


And the only complaints I've heard of KelTec customer service is from people who have never worked with them, but "heard" it was bad. Calling BS on this one.
 
rimlock

from my limited understanding of the .32 caliber, the Seecamps avoid rimlock by the tight tolerances in the magazine.

Are there rimlock problems in the old vintage guns like the PP, savage 1907, etc?
 
And the only complaints I've heard of KelTec customer service is from people who have never worked with them, but "heard" it was bad. Calling BS on this one.
Hey, if you're adamant about Kel Tec's CS being good and no one else has said they're bad, then I'll stand corrected.
 
from my limited understanding of the .32 caliber, the Seecamps avoid rimlock by the tight tolerances in the magazine.

Are there rimlock problems in the old vintage guns like the PP, savage 1907, etc?

rim lock is a product of the semi rimmed cartridge, not the gun.
 
My Colt 1903 is great to carry and very accurate. I applied white paint to front sight and that really made it more accurate for me. There is hatdly any recoil either.
 
"Prone to rimlock" is an exaggeration.
I have seen rimlock exactly once in 45 years of shooting .25 acp, .32 acp, and super .38 auto-all semi-rimmed cartridges.
Proper magazine loading is important.
 
I carry a P32 in my front pocket sometimes, it is very comfortable. I want to try one of the newer 380's, maybe an LCP.
 
Back
Top