What's with all this "liberal" nonsense?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Redworm, what bunch a crap.

When did you folks on the far left ever care about who was forced to pay for goverment services. Why don't you tell us why we all pay for killing little defensless babies??????????

College campuses are liberal indoctrination camps. The kids and the so called professors openly admitt to it on a daily basis.

Face it, liberalism is a mental disorder and it makes no sense to the sane.
 
As I posted earlier, the wacko religious objection to science ISN'T an objection to evolution. It is an objection to nearly every branch of science since all have independantly come up with information not compatible with the current pop understanding of Genesis.

Carbiner, where did you go to college?

Steelheart, this would be another good time to remind you that many people on earth have this thing called a "sense of humor". Bill Mahr, for instance, makes his living from this thing you lack, and is a professional "comedian". Not understanding those terms, I'm not surprised you confused what you read with an actual wish, rather than a statement of "jest". (All the words in quotes are available in dictionaries. Even conservative dictionaries.)
 
is Bill Maher running for office on a Democrat ticket?
That's irrelevant, Redworm. The fact is the question was tossed about. All references to it were redacted from his blog, due to the fact that it revealed the true colors of those who were talking about it.

Here's a reference to it from Power Line:
November 11, 2004
Democratic Party Crack-up

Today Best of the Web linked to a discussion thread on Bill Maher's site where Democrats debate the ethical question: Is it proper to shoot Republicans? Read it here, and contemplate the sad fact that these morons are American citizens, and some of them actually vote!
From what I have read, it was also discussed on Democratic Underground.
 
Redworm, what bunch a crap.

When did you folks on the far left ever care about who was forced to pay for goverment services. Why don't you tell us why we all pay for killing little defensless babies??????????
1. If you think I'm on the far left then you haven't been paying attention.
2. I've always cared about who is forced to pay for government services. I don't like paying for Social Security that I will never use or welfare that I will never use or food stamps that I will never use. Forced wealth redistribution gets on my nerves.
3. I don't believe anyone should be forced to pay for someone else's abortion. I've shelled out for one from my own wallet but that was my choice; you nor I should ever have to pay for something that goes against a set of personal fundamental beliefs.
College campuses are liberal indoctrination camps. The kids and the so called professors openly admitt to it on a daily basis.
Source?
Face it, liberalism is a mental disorder and it makes no sense to the sane.
So is conservativism.
 
That's irrelevant, Redworm. The fact is the question was tossed about. All references to it were redacted from his blog, due to the fact that it revealed the true colors of those who were talking about it.

Here's a reference to it from Power Line:
It's not irrelevant. So no politician actually made that statement. It was a joke tossed out by a comedian. You may not like what he's saying but he has the right to say it; not once was it considered a "threat" to anyone. In the end you're still taking a statement made by one man and applying it to an entire group of people. You're insinuating that politicians running under the Democratic Party have actually suggested shooting their collegues.
 
Steelheart, this would be another good time to remind you that many people on earth have this thing called a "sense of humor". Bill Mahr, for instance, makes his living from this thing you lack, and is a professional "comedian". Not understanding those terms, I'm not surprised you confused what you read with an actual wish, rather than a statement of "jest". (All the words in quotes are available in dictionaries. Even conservative dictionaries.)
Handy, this is one of the most lame and indefensible posts you have offered in recent memory - and that's saying alot. Talk of killing people is not funny, nor is it to be taken lightly. Talk about shooting Bush in the presence of the nearest police officer and see how funny he/she finds your "humor."

Go to your nearest high school and make statements about shooting people and see how many teachers double over with laughter at your "comedy." Go to the airport and joke with one of the ticket agents about shooting people - even if they are "only" Republicans. See how well-received your funny guy schtick will be.

Newsflash, Handy: There are some things you don't joke about - ever.
 
handy,
Technical College ed. at Brooklyn Park and Anoka cty Tecnical Colleges.

Brooklyn Park Community College.

I must say I enjoyed my time at BPCC, but the liberalism was thick.
 
Carbiner,

It's pretty clear that you devote a lot of energy towards worrying about what other people are doing with their own bodies.

Liberals don't hate Christians, they just hate having people like you decide that separation of church and state is not important.

If you want tax relief, perhaps you should start a movement to tax the church. That way, you'll have some justification in trying to shove your religious beliefs down everyone elses throat.

I had the displeasure of living in Minnesota for a couple of long years, and know that the Taxpayers League is nothing more than a group of wealthy Republicans who whine every time someone tries to get them to paay their fair share of taxes.
 
real agenda

The sad thing is the truth is seldom revealed because the real agenda is New World Order and those that control the government, media and everyones life is the bankers (illuminati). Wether your bend is conservative or liberal, they encourage dissention and arguement to distract us from looking at the real issues. The important issues will always be-How does it affect me? Not to be self centered but the constitution made a capitation tax (tribute) illegal in the constitution and was continually tried but shot down by the supreme court. In 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was passed (illegally-because the constitution only gives congress "the right to coin and set the value of money") thus giving private bankers the right to "conterfit"(print) money and set the value thereof. The 16th ammendment was falsely ratified to give taxing powers to congress the same year (to give the Fed Researve the collateral to loan money to the Fed. Gov.). Money is the root of all evil. Follow the Money. We are burdened today by being slaves to the government in violation of the 14th ammendment. The Patriot act ignores the 4th ammendments rights, detaining citizens without the neccessity of being charged indefinately, etc. We are living in an era where the children are not taught their own BILL OF RIGHTS in school. The book 1984 is here with the "doublespeak" where "war on drugs" means actually CIA supplied drugs, "war on terror" is a war of terror against citizens rather than terrorists, "operation Iraqi Liberation" (the actual name used at the start of the campaign-untill they realized it spelled OIL) is really about control and is completely unlawfull by geneva and U.N. conditions. Those that controll us have studied with the Nazi's how to influence the "minds of men" and they cover their tracks and make sure they aren't exposed in mainstreme media. Why fight with each other when we all want the same things (the founding fathers laid out in the constitution), NO TAXES, FREEDOM. Malum Inse< Malum Prohibitum. God's laws-common laws (that everyone inherintly knows-that you can't murder, rape, steal, lie,etc.. My personal favorite is Jesus' admonition "do unto others as you would like others to do unto you". For a good read http://www.whale.to/b/mullins5.html eastuce mullins great book. God BLess all rant over
 
Redworm, Redworm, Redworm (*sigh*)...

It's not irrelevant.
Wrong. The fact that it was even discussed is what's relevant.
So no politician actually made that statement. It was a joke tossed out by a comedian.
I never said a Democrat politician made the statement - their followers and voters did. It was not made by a comedian - it was posted by Democrat voters on various message boards and blogs. You are attempting to misdirect and deflect from the fact that Democrats were discussing killing Republicans.
You may not like what he's saying but he has the right to say it; not once was it considered a "threat" to anyone.
Maybe you thought it was cute - I took it as a threat, just like if anyone else would threaten to shoot me. I'm funny that way.
In the end you're still taking a statement made by one man and applying it to an entire group of people.
Nope. Wrong again. I never said it was all Democrats who were talking about shooting Republicans. I defy you to quote me where I said "all" Democrats. you can't do it because I didn't say it.
Yet another of your attempts to twist my words. I won't stand for it, Bub.
You're insinuating that politicians running under the Democratic Party have actually suggested shooting their collegues.
As I said earlier, I did not say Democrat politicians were advocating shooting their colleagues - or anyone. Their followers were the ones talking about it. Again, more baseless and untrue fabrications on your part.

In the end, your words are nothing more than a desperate, contrived and hollow attempt to sidestep the fact that some Democrats after the 2004 election were so blind with hate and rage that Bush won that they threw a childish tantrum, which manifested itself in their discussing killing Republicans.

This from the "Give Peace A Chance" party. Sounds more like the "Give Me My Way NOOOOOOW!!!!" party.
 
Us against us.

The Big Picture, since it seems invisible to many, is that not everyone who disagrees with you is your enemy.

Lack of understanding of the above is why the assault on our second amendment rights continues to be effective.

Anybody who thinks every Republican is right and every Democrat is Al Franken just isn't listening or thinking right.
 
Wrong. The fact that it was even discussed is what's relevant.
Free speech as long as it's speech you agree with, right? If you think he's the first comedian to make a joke about shooting someone then I would recommend watching Comedy Central once in a while. You might be surprised to learn that some people can seperate fantasy from reality and joke about things they don't actually intend to do.

I never said a Democrat politician made the statement - their followers and voters did. It was not made by a comedian - it was posted by Democrat voters on various message boards and blogs. You are attempting to misdirect and deflect from the fact that Democrats were discussing killing Republicans.

Maybe you thought it was cute - I took it as a threat, just like if anyone else would threaten to shoot me. I'm funny that way.
How many of their followers and voters? A dozen? A hundred? A million? You're still taking the opinions of a few people and applying them to an entire group and you're still missing the point of the joke.

Seriously, do you actually believe that Bill Maher was condoning homicide?

Nope. Wrong again. I never said it was all Democrats who were talking about shooting Republicans. I defy you to quote me where I said "all" Democrats. you can't do it because I didn't say it.
Yet another of your attempts to twist my words. I won't stand for it, Bub.
Yet you expect people to stand for it when you twist theirs? You didn't have to add a modifier "(but not all of them)"; proper grammar would have you simply change it to "a Democrat asked the question..."

Simple. There is no "fact" in your assertion other than the fact that you're taking a joke far more seriously than any person with a sense of humor would. For you to actually believe that Bill Maher and anyone else capable of rational thought entertained the idea of commiting homicide is ridiculous.
 
I find it ridiculous that someone in the public eye would be so irresponsible as to allow such discussions on his website. Free speech does not apply to threatening people's lives.

Again, I said Democrats (more than one) discussed shooting Republicans. I did not say all Democrats discussed it. And I did not attempt to twist your words, unlike your attempt to twist mine.

Hang it up, Redworm. You are attempting to defend the indefensible.
 
Here it is, straight from the Democratic Underground:
people basically laughed at me and said theres nothing we can do. BS! If Bush wins, we have to stand up and take our country back. Whatever country Malloy was talking about, where the president there wouldnt leave and the people came out in masses and forced him to leave. There's only one war I support, and it's a new civil war. A battle for our country back. Bring em on!

So there you go: Democrats (the "enlightened and tolerant people of good will and compassion") calling for bloodshed and war to overturn the will of the people as expressed in the 2004 election.

Shouldn't the FBI be keeping an eye on these people?:D
 
Free speech does not apply to threatening people's lives.
And who was threatened? No reasonable person would think that he was threatening every Republican in the country. Defend the indefensible? It was a ****ing joke.

So there you go: Democrats (the "enlightened and tolerant people of good will and compassion") calling for bloodshed and war to overturn the will of the people as expressed in the 2004 election.
Because there has never been a thread on THIS forum or on THR saying the exact same damn thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top