The aftermath - realistic assessments of the situation please

True, shortwave.

I think we may have been watching the same channel.

But there is a reason we are a swing state - minds change often and quickly
 
In Missouri, a bill was introduced to allow concealed carry in schools. As of now, it is allowed only with the school district's permission. I don't know how many districts allow it. My friend who teaches high school was denied permission at his school.

The local sheriff was interviewed on TV, and he is in favor of concealed carry in schools.
 
True, shortwave.

I think we may have been watching the same channel.

But there is a reason we are a swing state - minds change often and quickly
Click to expand...

You're so right about minds changing Stressfire.

So far I've been very proud of Gov. Kasich. He has been standing his ground in saying more gun control is not the answer but rather further treatment/study into the root of the problem with more research into the mental aspects of the problem. I would like to hear his personal thoughts on whether school officials should carry.
 
Last edited:
People like to forget that columbine happened while we were under the assault weapon ban. You can not legislate away all the bad things in the world. Especially when you are going after the wrong thing.

I hate when they say gun violence as there is no such thing. Guns are incapable of violent acts. There is just plain old violence. It has been around forever and its what we need to try to mitigate.

In equality is what causes the most problems. The Top 10% of the population taking 90% of the income while the bottom 90 literally are killing each other for a smaller and smaller piece of the pie. Universal health care we needed it years ago. This is the result of people slipping through the system. It does not matter that he used a gun to do it. All that matters is that he did it and how are we going to stop the next guy from doing it. If he does not have access to a gun and can't steal one he will make a bomb or start a fire. SOLVE THE REAL PROBLEM.
 
Jason_Iowa

In equality is what causes the most problems
Click to expand...

By every account I've seen, the Lanza's lived in a home valued at 1.6 million dollars and Ms Lanza's income was well over a quarter of a million dollars per year from her divorce settlement. Income was not the issue here. The problem is that it is next to impossible to institutionalize a mentally deranged person in this country. Thanks to groups like the ACLU, the courts have determined that a mentally ill person has a right to refuse treatment, unless they have demonstrated a propensity to harm themselves or others. Unfortunately the bar is set so high to prove that potential for harm, dangerously mentally ill people are released to the streets on a regular basis. In a typical scenario, a mentally ill person engages in some form of violence; he/she is arrested and placed in the mental health wing of a local hospital for evaluation. After a few weeks of no behavior problems in the hospital, a court hearing is held and the mentally ill person is released back to the custody of their family or to some halfway house where they just walk away. It is sad really, that under the guise of protecting the rights of the mentally ill, we allow them to be untreated victims and perpetrators of crime.
 
Last edited:
So your solution is to lock up more people? I'm not saying that's a bad idea, because we already do that, almost as many as China, but I just wanted to be clear on what you're suggesting.
 
It would be a lot easier to accept some limited, but sensible limits on firearms if it weren't so apparent that those supporting such measures see them as only a step toward their real desire: the elimination of the private ownership of firearms. Even agreeing to what seems reasonable, lets say a limit on magazines that hold more than 30 rounds, becomes just the new starting point for further regulation by the anti-gun crowd. Unfortunately, despite the apparent huge increase in gun sales after tragic events like the Conn shooting, census data seems to say that the percent of households with guns is actually going down, not up. It seems that there are fewer gun owners, but those owners own more guns. As fewer people own, and have familiarity with guns, it becomes easier to demonize the gun itself. Those without guns often don't seem to care much about further restriction on those who do have guns. It seems a simple proposition to me: will you accept the risk of being a victim, or do you want the ability to defend yourself and your family? Sadly, we are moving toward becoming a nation of people who are willing to be victims, with reliance upon the government for their security, just as the citizens of Great Britain and Australia have done.
 
Bluetrain

So your solution is to lock up more people? I'm not saying that's a bad idea, because we already do that, almost as many as China, but I just wanted to be clear on what you're suggesting.
Click to expand...

The dangerously mentally ill should be housed in secure mental health treatment facilities. We should not be able to send people into these facilities on a whim, but if a preponderance of evidence and expert psychiatric testimony strongly suggest a mentally ill person is a danger to himself or others, a judge should be able to so order.
 
One thing that has struck me about the discussion in the Newtown tragedy is his access to his mother's guns. His family has admitted they knew he had mental issues, yet the guns he used in the murders were not, apparently, secured sufficiently to keep them out of his hands. Is there a law in CT about the owner being responsible for crimes committed with weapons he owned that were not secured? If his mother had survived, would she have been prosecuted for not securing her guns?

If those guns had been in a safe, with the door locked, he'd have had no easy access to firearms ... there are so many things that should be done to help prevent a repeat of Newtown; let's enforce laws about securing firearms ... let's see the feds actually prosecute those who use guns in crime on gun charges, and not bargain them away to speed the process ...

sadly, we who enjoy shooting and count on guns for safety and sport are in for a storm on this one, in the form of new laws that would have had no impact on the murders ... better mental health, enforce existing laws ... noting, as others did, that existing laws worked to keep guns out of the killer's hands, yet he still managed to obtain them, apparently through the negligence of one of his victims ...
 
In all honesty, despite the recent political climate and the horrific events that have occurred.

What is the likely hood of something actually successfully being passed? It seems like the Pro-RKBA supporters on both sides have been shaken pretty badly for both good and bad, we've lost and gained support or so it seems. The republican' still hold the house, and the only other course of action that I can think of that Obama can do is to implement another EO just like Clinton did with the original AWB.

It's really hard for me, a young and relatively new shooter to keep a positive outlook on what may come. I fear we're going to see something similar to the 1994 AWB if not worse, or some other form of asanine/onerous legislation. It's pretty clear that the current administration is openly hostile to 2A supporters, and with recent events, the support for said legislation is stronger than it has been in a long while.

Am I worrying for nothing here? I will be donating to one of the pro 2A organizations as much as I can to contribute in the fight to keep our rights, but I feel like we are now going to be fighting a really steep uphill battle. I keep saying that we own the house and that trying to get anything passed will be difficult, but again, support for the gun supporters seem to be on very shakey grounds and it can go in any direction from what I can tell.
 
On the news this AM, it was stated that apparently his mother did NOTHING to secure the guns in the home. From earlier statements it was clear that she felt that the shooting sports would give her son confidence and self discipline. She must have felt confident that her "plan" was working, at least enough to give him easy access to the guns. No amount of laws will stop people from making foolish or irresponsible decisions regarding guns because they will be convinced that the situation is somehow different for them or their family. When a friend was an LEO in a big midwestern city years ago, he was called to a home where the tenant complained to him about her unwanted brother-in-law who was staying there and had left a loaded 12 gauge in the coat closet. The gun was then confiscated but then my friend was told by his watch commander that there was not enough reason to arrest the brother-in-law. Fortunately the police took the gun before one of the children in the household found it. My guess is that this is typical all over the country.
 
This is such a difficult problem. We all know that the vast majority gun owners never do anything illegal with their firearms. 99.8% of firearms sold are never used to harm anyone. The problem is the vast amount of damage that 0.2% of firearms inflicts.
In almost all cases of mass shooting some type of mental illness is involved. Federal, state and local governments have all cut back on spending for mental health sevices. As a nation we seem to be doing a poor job of caring for our mentally ill.
I don't believe that gun control or bans will help, but I think this will be done anyway. The last ban was usless, with some small changes assult type weapons continued to be sold. Even high cap mags could still be found if you looked realy hard.
I just don't have any good ideas to solve this issue. How about you?
 
I think we also fall into the same trap as those blaming guns when we blame some other thing for the "reason" violence occurs. History is the best guide as humans have been violent since the time of recorded history and beyond. People who chose to engage in violent acts will do so for a number of reasons. The tools they use are their choice and most modern cases their actions are based on getting notoriety. The blaming of video games, movies, books, guns etc holds little weight as the overwhelming number of people who engage in these activities or use these items do not go on killing sprees. The individual is the issue in every single case. That individual is the problem. Let's try not to do the same thing to others that is being done to us in order to protect what we like.
 
One thing that has struck me about the discussion in the Newtown tragedy is his access to his mother's guns. His family has admitted they knew he had mental issues, yet the guns he used in the murders were not, apparently, secured sufficiently to keep them out of his hands. Is there a law in CT about the owner being responsible for crimes committed with weapons he owned that were not secured? If his mother had survived, would she have been prosecuted for not securing her guns?

If those guns had been in a safe, with the door locked, he'd have had no easy access to firearms ... there are so many things that should be done to help prevent a repeat of Newtown; let's enforce laws about securing firearms ... let's see the feds actually prosecute those who use guns in crime on gun charges, and not bargain them away to speed the process
Click to expand...

Exactly.
 
Obviously I have guns and shoot for enjoyment. If my grand babies were killed in one of these incidents I would be asking how the right to own a semiautomatic weapon, 30 round clips out the wazoo, and thousands of rounds of ammo supersedes my families right to life. This argument is probably going to get ugly. The arms manufacturers and munitions companies will fight like hell. Funny in a sad way that the rhetoric about political action on gun ownership drives sales of guns through the roof.
Click to expand...

Colorado Redneck as a grandfather with four grand babies in elementary school I understand your fear. I also understand your desire to do something to stop the senseless killings. We all want to stop the proliferation of violence and evil in this world. What we cannot do is gut the 2A in our desire to do something. The consequences of that will effect the lives of our children and grandchildren in ways that also scare the hell out of me.
 
In all honesty, despite the recent political climate and the horrific events that have occurred.

What is the likely hood of something actually successfully being passed?
Click to expand...

I would say its extremely high now, as in statistical certainty. I'd give a 90% chance that reinstatement of the old ban will occur within 90 days of the new Congress, if that long.
 
So much for my FAL build. It's really disheartening really. It's idiotic as well, as the laws already in place did absolutely NOTHING to stop this from occuring.
 
No disagreement from me. I'm for more detailed background checks and more focus on mental healththe gun aspect, but the heavy focus should be on the mental health industry and the fact all these people had massive run ins previously with schools, police etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top