POINT BY POINT JOAB.
What does one have to do with the other you ask.
YOU made a flippant statement denigrating a man as "borderline racist", while characterizing 14yr. old mexican boys with cell phones and a bicycle as drug dealers.
CAN YOU SEE THE CONNECTION?
QUOTE:Actually I assume that they will ascertain that the family next door was mexican with a 14 year old son. It's called foreshadowing END QUOTE.
(It is also a racist statement) Which in and of itself is NOT NEGATIVE.
YOU can also be "FORESHADOWING" that YOU think 14yr. old mexican boys are drug dealers, or that having a cell phone means you are a drug dealer, or that nosy neighbors with to much time on their hands assume that mexican boys with cell phones and bicycles are up to no good. ALL NEGATIVELY PREJUDICIAL.
I could care less about your cell service, but passerby in your neighborood may make assumptions as to why YOU are outside at all hours of the night
on your cell phone. Just as you did about that poor, poor hispanic child.
You assume they got the wrong house. Remember, "NEVER SEEN ANYTHING CONCRETE".
You still have not answered the question of how YOU and the neighborhood came to the drug dealer conclusion. BECAUSE HE WAS 14, OR MEXICAN, OR BOTH?
All in all, my point is still made that you and I and everyone else is "RACIST", by definition. If I say Japanese, we will have a good idea of what the person should look like. If I say muslim it will more than likely conjure up images of insano-ben-lamo.
I think your statements are "BORDERLINE PREJUDICE", which is "A FAJITA OF ANOTHER FLAVOR", and a bad FLAVOR at that.
I "FORESHADOW" your less gifted reply. soon I hope.
What does one have to do with the other you ask.
YOU made a flippant statement denigrating a man as "borderline racist", while characterizing 14yr. old mexican boys with cell phones and a bicycle as drug dealers.
CAN YOU SEE THE CONNECTION?
QUOTE:Actually I assume that they will ascertain that the family next door was mexican with a 14 year old son. It's called foreshadowing END QUOTE.
(It is also a racist statement) Which in and of itself is NOT NEGATIVE.
YOU can also be "FORESHADOWING" that YOU think 14yr. old mexican boys are drug dealers, or that having a cell phone means you are a drug dealer, or that nosy neighbors with to much time on their hands assume that mexican boys with cell phones and bicycles are up to no good. ALL NEGATIVELY PREJUDICIAL.
I could care less about your cell service, but passerby in your neighborood may make assumptions as to why YOU are outside at all hours of the night
on your cell phone. Just as you did about that poor, poor hispanic child.
You assume they got the wrong house. Remember, "NEVER SEEN ANYTHING CONCRETE".
You still have not answered the question of how YOU and the neighborhood came to the drug dealer conclusion. BECAUSE HE WAS 14, OR MEXICAN, OR BOTH?
All in all, my point is still made that you and I and everyone else is "RACIST", by definition. If I say Japanese, we will have a good idea of what the person should look like. If I say muslim it will more than likely conjure up images of insano-ben-lamo.
I think your statements are "BORDERLINE PREJUDICE", which is "A FAJITA OF ANOTHER FLAVOR", and a bad FLAVOR at that.
I "FORESHADOW" your less gifted reply. soon I hope.