Stopping Power

Status
Not open for further replies.
Troll? Where? Which way did he go?

But seriously, if a 230gr Federal HydraShok in .45ACP penetrates 13.7", expanes to 0.71" and creates a wound area of 28.4 sq.in. while a 124gr +P+ Federal HydraShok in 9mm penetrates 13.3", expanes to 0.67" and creates a wound area of 44.8 sq.in.; doesn't this imply that the 9mm does more damage and is a more effective stopper?

I'm not looking to start a flame war -- I'm just seriously trying to understand.

That said, despite what the numbers show, when the gators make their way out of the swamp, it's a P14-45 that I reach for -- something about that bigger bullets that instills more confidence in me.
 
[Sorry for the tripple tap -- computer forze on me and I thought the connection dropped]

[This message has been edited by FUD (edited June 08, 2000).]
 
[Sorry for the tripple tap -- computer forze on me and I thought the connection dropped]

[This message has been edited by FUD (edited June 08, 2000).]
 
ok as if we havn't covered this ground enough already. do you want your bullets fast and small or large and slow? what ever blows your skirt up. if you can conceal that a full size 1911 fine.if you like the same size guun in a 9mm format with 15 rounds, OK. most .45's are well into the conceable range. most small .40's and nines conceal so much the better. hay i don't want to get shot with a BB pistol much less a nine. i happen to own pistols in all three 9mm, .40 and .45. my spin is this most .45's are on the uncomfortable side of thick and large to carry for ME. i like my 9mm's, but you have to have a high performance 9mm load to make it the equal of the .40. the .45 with all it's "pre-expanded" glory needs longer barrels and higher pressure/high performance ammo to create wound cavities equal to the standard .40 loads.
of course most .40 loadings are high performance to begin with. this is because the .40 is the new kid on the block. and old low pressure loads don't exist for it, except for a few downloaded duds that some ammo makers experimented with. it hasn't been around for 100 years and weak guns in .40 just weren't built
so if you can't shoot a .40 as well as your hot 9mm i am sorry. that syndrone does not affect me. to me a hot loaded 9mm has just as much recoil as a regular .40 load in the same model gun.
i do not carry a larger .45 on a regular basis and packing a 9mm with +P+ wonder bullets seems like the patch to the problem. if by packing a .40 i am a product of advertising or have the gun rag brain rot, i am a happy and deadly victim.
my $.02 worth

------------------
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what is for lunch.
Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the outcome of the vote.
Let he that hath no sword sell his garment and buy one. Luke 22-36
They all hold swords, being expert in war: every man hath his sword upon his thigh because of fear in the night. Song of Solomon 3-8
The man that can keep his head and aims carefully when the situation has gone bad and lead is flying usually wins the fight.
 
What amazes me is that as many times as these debates have started different threads at different times on these gun BBs, I find my self reading them in case I might learn something new. So far nothing new. A lot of strong opinions from people with favorite calibers. Y'all have me so confused that I own 3 different calibers of the H&K USP. (Darnit they don't make a 10mm I'll have to buy a Glock). No, I'm not really that gullible. I own them because I like reloading and shooting different calibers. In the end no one needs to defend the caliber gun they have decided to carry. If they carry it they believe it will do the job and the 9, 40 or 45 will work if you're on target. The advantage in choosing one gun/caliber is more practice with one gun. In the past year I have fired about 5000 rounds through 4 guns in these three calibers. If practice for carry and self defense were the only reasons for shooting then I would be better off with one gun, one caliber. If you practice and carry with one gun you have the advantage, so don't worry about the caliber or what anyone else thinks.

Well there you go... yet one more opinion.

------------------
 
Did that kid on the TV talk show with half their brain blown out by a shotgun grow up to be MC of the show? Rosie?
barf.gif


------------------
Get your 1911s and AR15s while you still can!
 
Give the Administrator a cigar! He is 100% correct. Stopping Power is a urban legend. It is ALL in the shot placement. And when in doubt, step up to .45 acp. There are no doubts there and nothing to explain. :)

Robert
 
Sure do like the 9mm. But I have better advice. If you know you're going to a gunfight TAKE RIFLE.
 
hi Fud,

I noticed you mentioned 124 +P+ Federal HSs. I see 124, 135 and 147 grain Hydra Shocks in their catalog, some called "Personal Defense". Is there a big velocity difference? Where can I buy some of the +P+? Thanks in advance.

On the 9mm vs 40/45 question I had a couple interesting experiences. 20 years ago the Berkeley PD, using "PC" fmj 9mm shot a BG involved in a Bank Robbery 31 times (yes you read that right "thirty one" pencil punctures) before he stopped returning fire. About 14 years ago, I had to shoot two enraged pit bulls. Each took two 124 grain Remington Hi Velocity HPs in the torso/neck before breaking off the attack. Both dogs ran from the scene and died shortly after. I decided that I never again wanted to HAVE to shoot anything twice to get it to stop, and switched to the 45.

Since that time, the 9mm has improved greatly, and I don't think that potential targets have improved at all, so I bought a Sig 226 which I am delighted with. Hope I never HAVE to use it again.
 
Raymond3, the 124gr +P+ Federal HydraShok is a LEO-only round. This is how it compares to their regular 124gr bullet:

FPS = 1120 (1220 for the +P+)
FPE = 346 (410 for the +P+)
One Shot Stopping Power = 81% (86% for the +P+)

Since the +P+ isn't publicly available and Cor-Bon has been having some quality control issues the past couple of years, I've been using the Remington Golden Sabre +P 124gr which has a velocity of 1180fps and energy of 384fpe with a 83% one-shot stopping capability. Hope this helps. Regards,

FUD
fudeagle.gif

Share what you know, learn what you don't.
 
Light n fast works pretty well. Heavy n slow works pretty well. With practice and good fit I dont see muzzle flip as an issue cept in .44Mag (hot ones) and above. Therefore I kinda tend to like heavy and fast.

That 124gr at 1120fps looks like a .38 spec load. I carry 125 at 1125fps in my mod36 pocket gun.

Sam
 
Actually, if I know I'm going to a gunfight, I'll make a point to be somewhere else!

As far as stopping power of various rounds from 9mm to .45ACP, far more is going to depend on tactics and situational awareness than the caliber you're carrying. If you wander around with your head in a dark place, all the stopping power in the world won't help you in your holster.

I am totally amused that the "caliber wars" erupt with regularity, and all the same words are spoken each time. :)
 
Chris; you said:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>I believe that the 9mm got a bad rap in the famous FBI Miami gunfight where several agents were killed after they had fatally wounded the bad guys. This fight showed clearly that FMJ bullets don't stop people well.[/quote]

Actually the perp was killed by a 115gr. Win. Silvertip. No FMJ's were used.

The Silvertip went through Platt's (the perp)
right elbow, severing the brachial artery, which immediately began to spray blood, and continued to do so. It then penetrated his chest wall, completely collapsed the right lung and severing many pulmonary vessels, such that 1300cc of blood was found in his chest at autopsy (probably around 40% blood volume).

What more would you want a bullet to do??

Walt
 
Hello all. I'll bet that part of the reason that we are all involved in this "stopping power" discussion is that the choice of defensive ammunition is something we CAN control unlike many of a firefight's parameters. I'm "on record" as stating that 9mm with high performance loads is my favorite all around caliber and one I've used confidently for self-protection for years as both a police officer and private citizen. As many have said, "There's no free lunch," in this "stopping power" aspect. Usually, this has been in reference to recoil and weight/size of weapons. I think it should apply to yet another aspect, placement. I do believe that a .38 is "better" than a .22, but only if they are both properly placed; a perfect hit with a .22 will be better than a graze with the .38. With certain loads, I've little doubt that forties and .45ACPs, etc are "better" than a hot 9mm, but I don't think that the difference is as great as might have been believed in the past. Example: A police officer under my command took a (low) torso hit with a 180 gr JHP in .40 S&W. He was seriously injured, lost a kidney, nearly died, but didn't even know he'd been shot until officers having seen him shot advised him to sit down while they summoned medical attention. (I don't honestly remember the ammunition make, but did see the recovered bullet which was mushroomed and partially fragmented.) Another officer who'd worked for me was forced to shoot a felon while in a life-and-death struggle over the officer's weapon. The felon was shot squarely in the heart and dropped instantly, apparently dead on the scene. (The load was +P Federal 124 gr HydraShok.) It, too, expanded and showed some fragmentation. The difference was shot placement in my opinion. I do agree that a 9mm with proper loads is the lower limit for a "serious" defensive handgun, but recall yet another case in which a citizen being chased by a dude with a knife, fired one shot from his Raven .25, killing the dude with a heart shot. The load was the Winchester FMJ load that has virtually no "stopping power." This bullet did not expand and made but a tiny wound to the eye. Placement did the trick.
I truly believe that the nine with its best loads (whatever they are) is superior to some larger calibers with certain loads, but that heavier calibers such as forty and forty-five
with their better or best loads will exceed the nine. Yet, all are sufficient with placement and all are deficient without it.
Best to all.
 
Hello all. I'll bet that part of the reason that we are all involved in this "stopping power" discussion is that the choice of defensive ammunition is something we CAN control unlike many of a firefight's parameters. I'm "on record" as stating that 9mm with high performance loads is my favorite all around caliber and one I've used confidently for self-protection for years as both a police officer and private citizen. As many have said, "There's no free lunch," in this "stopping power" aspect. Usually, this has been in reference to recoil and weight/size of weapons. I think it should apply to yet another aspect, placement. I do believe that a .38 is "better" than a .22, but only if they are both properly placed; a perfect hit with a .22 will be better than a graze with the .38. With certain loads, I've little doubt that forties and .45ACPs, etc are "better" than a hot 9mm, but I don't think that the difference is as great as might have been believed in the past. Example: A police officer under my command took a (low) torso hit with a 180 gr JHP in .40 S&W. He was seriously injured, lost a kidney, nearly died, but didn't even know he'd been shot until officers having seen him shot advised him to sit down while they summoned medical attention. (I don't honestly remember the ammunition make, but did see the recovered bullet which was mushroomed and partially fragmented.) Another officer who'd worked for me was forced to shoot a felon while in a life-and-death struggle over the officer's weapon. The felon was shot squarely in the heart and dropped instantly, apparently dead on the scene. (The load was +P Federal 124 gr HydraShok.) It, too, expanded and showed some fragmentation. The difference was shot placement in my opinion. I do agree that a 9mm with proper loads is the lower limit for a "serious" defensive handgun, but recall yet another case in which a citizen being chased by a dude with a knife, fired one shot from his Raven .25, killing the dude with a heart shot. The load was the Winchester FMJ load that has virtually no "stopping power." This bullet did not expand and made but a tiny wound to the eye. Placement did the trick.
I truly believe that the nine with its best loads (whatever they are) is superior to some larger calibers with certain loads, but that heavier calibers such as forty and forty-five
with their better or best loads will exceed the nine. Yet, all are sufficient with placement and all are deficient without it.
Best to all.
 
Hello all. I'll bet that part of the reason that we are all involved in this "stopping power" discussion is that the choice of defensive ammunition is something we CAN control unlike many of a firefight's parameters. I'm "on record" as stating that 9mm with high performance loads is my favorite all around caliber and one I've used confidently for self-protection for years as both a police officer and private citizen. As many have said, "There's no free lunch," in this "stopping power" aspect. Usually, this has been in reference to recoil and weight/size of weapons. I think it should apply to yet another aspect, placement. I do believe that a .38 is "better" than a .22, but only if they are both properly placed; a perfect hit with a .22 will be better than a graze with the .38. With certain loads, I've little doubt that forties and .45ACPs, etc are "better" than a hot 9mm, but I don't think that the difference is as great as might have been believed in the past. Example: A police officer under my command took a (low) torso hit with a 180 gr JHP in .40 S&W. He was seriously injured, lost a kidney, nearly died, but didn't even know he'd been shot until officers having seen him shot advised him to sit down while they summoned medical attention. (I don't honestly remember the ammunition make, but did see the recovered bullet which was mushroomed and partially fragmented.) Another officer who'd worked for me was forced to shoot a felon while in a life-and-death struggle over the officer's weapon. The felon was shot squarely in the heart and dropped instantly, apparently dead on the scene. (The load was +P Federal 124 gr HydraShok.) It, too, expanded and showed some fragmentation. The difference was shot placement in my opinion. I do agree that a 9mm with proper loads is the lower limit for a "serious" defensive handgun, but recall yet another case in which a citizen being chased by a dude with a knife, fired one shot from his Raven .25, killing the dude with a heart shot. The load was the Winchester FMJ load that has virtually no "stopping power." This bullet did not expand and made but a tiny wound to the eye. Placement did the trick.
I truly believe that the nine with its best loads (whatever they are) is superior to some larger calibers with certain loads, but that heavier calibers such as forty and forty-five
with their better or best loads will exceed the nine. Much earlier in my career, 3 officers were involved in a firefight with a fleeing suspect who was shot with a .38 Spec JHP, a .357 Magnum 158 gr JHP, and a .45 ACP 230 gr Norma JHP. All were torso hits, but not centered. This suspect outran the officers and was found nearly dead from loss of blood in a garage! This was over 20 years ago and neither of the two recovered JHPs expanded at all. The .357 bullet was not recovered as it'd passed all the way through the suspect. 9mm, .40, and .45 high performance loads are sufficient rounds with placement and all are deficient without it.
Best to all.
 
Wow, what with all the double and tripple tap messages here, a guy might get the idea that you all don't believe in the "one stop shot"
barf.gif


Placement, placement, placement
Displacement, displacement, displacement

Tom


------------------
A "Miss" is the ultimate overpenetration!
You can never be too rich, too skinny, or too well armed!
Wake up and realize that you have the moral imperative of action..!!!
 
Viper,

You seem to take in a lot of territory with some of your statements. Of course this is a topic that is constantly discussed on TFL and will continue to be discussed and probably very few will change their opinions.

However, are you the ultimate "know it all"? Are you a "real commando". How do you know that those who have posted for or against the 9mm are "armchair commandos"?

Do you think that Miami is the most dangerous city in the US? You say that you carry guns because you actually need them? Is that an implication that the rest of us don't?

Your statement that you know why LE went to the .40 is pretty broad and something I find very hard to believe. I've got several friends and relatives in LE and last time I checked they were getting all the ammo that they wanted and it was free. Do you think that .40 ammo is that much cheaper than 9mm?

If you are in love with the 9mm then more power to you. It has it's merits and I carry it from time to time. I've also carried .40, .45, .45 Colt, .380, .38spl and .357 depending on where I was and whatever the circumstances dictated.

You brag about the loads you carry in your guns as being proven to put men down with one round. Then go on to say that no one I mean no one fires only once in a life or death situation. Contradiction? I believe so.

So you've been in lots of shootouts have you? Do you remember the noise being a factor or even recoil? Not hardly. When you get into that life or death mode you somehow block out most of the sound as the adrenaline is pumping. And unless you are very small with very weak hands the recoil is not an issue at all.

I don't normally respond in this manner but you're post seemed like so much hot air.

As has been stated above, placemnet is everything no matter what you shoot. There are many people killed with .22s every year. Tell them that a .22 is wimpy or can't do the trick.
 
Someone is touchy. Florida is not the only place where people can legally carry and where sh!t actually happens. I live in the middle of New Mexico and along with your normal BGs, we have tons of viscious wild animals and occasional packs of irate illegal aliens from Mexico to deal with. My state does not issue a carry permit, as all people here who are authorised to own a gun may carry one. I have shot 9mm's and they are very easily controllable. Myself though, I trust my Beretta Cougar 8040 and my Glock 22. If I had to carry a 9mm, I would want to make sure I had a matching carbine like Rugar offers. That way I could get a few more rounds into my target before it got to close. The local, county, and federal officers here are required to carry .40S&W. Their only freedom is model, if they don't like what is issued. Not to put down the 9mm at all, but the .40S&W, I feel, is way superior.
 
I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

9mm's, .40's and .45's are the ballistic equivalent of redheads, blondes and brunettes.

Take the one that you prefer, and don't worry about what anyone else thinks of your choice.

If you want stopping power, use a 12 gauge--not a pistol.

LawDog



[This message has been edited by LawDog (edited June 09, 2000).]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top