San Francisco officials brand NRA a ‘domestic terrorist organization’

USNRet93 said:
They gonna use this guy?
NRA-ILA hires new counsel, who has no experience as a lobbyist, worked in the video game industry, and is being sued by his former employer for embezzlement.

https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/nr...ts-of-baggage/
The NRA-ILA is not the same entity, legally, as the NRA. The new guy was hired by the NRA-ILA.

At least one of the articles on the NRA's lawsuit against SF reported that the Brewer law firm is handling the suit.
 
L.A. also passed a similar resolution and the NRA also brought suit against L.A. That city then tried to have the NRA's case dismissed but...

The NRA’s challenge to a similar ordinance in Los Angeles remains pending. Last month, the city’s motion to dismiss was denied in its entirety by federal district judge Stephen V. Wilson, who found that the NRA had stated a clear First Amendment claim.

tipoc
 
making them back down but walking away with empty pockets after being slandered across the nation (and further) is not much of a win.
 
The NRA does incite people to acts of violence.

I disagree. The NRA does not incite violence, they provide education on safety and the proper use of violence as a justified legal means of self defense.

Never heard them preach that its something you ought to do, only that if you choose to, this is how its best done.

To me, that's quite a bit different from inciting violence, or anything else.

If you think the NRA incites or advocates violence, or any crime, you're drinking the Kool-Aid of the anti gun bigots.
 
Back
Top