as, “The use of any…explosive, firearm, or other weapon or dangerous device, with intent to
endanger, directly or indirectly, the safety of one or more individuals or...
If this is to be taken at face value then their own POLICE must also be a terrorist organization. Like wise their own security forces, public or private.
Everyone who goes armed, be they private citizen or public employee do so with the intent to endanger the safety of one or more individuals, by SHOOTING THEM when justified. This goes from the SF police to the Secret Service protecting the President.
The whole point of being armed is so that one can "endanger the safety" of an attacker, to the point where they cease being an attacker. \
Using the exact same logic, the people providing security for the SF board of Supervisors are ALSO a terrorist organization, and since the city PAYS them, under (I assume) the authority of the Board of Supervisors, then, the SF Board of Supervisors is supporting a terrorist organization, which, by the definition they are using also makes them a terrorist organization!
So, in effect the SF board is admitting that they, themselves are terrorists!!
seems to me they didn't really think this through, but that's no surprise, is it?