Public displays of open carry

For the armed individual, open carry is a shoot-me-first indicator, and someone who isn't a threat might feel threatened, so what's the point?

This is an emotional argument.

I believe you will be hard pressed to find a single incident in which that happened. I can show you several where lawful open carry has deterred crime, however.

I personally do not open carry, but I fully support those that do.
 
The police have not and do not always open carry, even those in uniform, though there is no doubt they are armed. Armed police in England carry submachine guns.
 
I would like concealed carry with no penalty for printing or flashing.
Move to Arizona.


A guy in Wisconsin was robbed and his gun stolen specifically because he was open-carrying. Exercising his right to open carry made him a target.

When I was younger and worked part-time as a security guard to supplement my meager Army income, I was moved to different posts and then they settled me into working at a liquor store. One day a dude walks in, he is holding his hand up in the air, wait, something is in his hand, what is it? Wow, it's a gun in a holster.

Yup, this dude got at least 6 steps inside before I could cognitively recognize that he had a gun held up in plain sight. I knew all the guys at the registers had guns in easy reach. Now I knew what my real job was, I was a paid for pop-up-target so they wouldn't get shot. I quit really fast.
 
I could see the value of an organized, open-carry demonstration, but random open-carry as a statement, doesn't do anyone any good.
For the armed individual, open carry is a shoot-me-first indicator, and someone who isn't a threat might feel threatened, so what's the point?

Agreed. A march/protest works for me.
Utilizing OC in the country or when sporting works for me.
The random "dude" wandering around daring a confrontation to me is the same thing as left coast treehuggers daring someone to arrest them.

EDIT: I guess I view OC like PDAs. Both are rights. Both are best kept private.
 
Last edited:
OC in Chicago

I cannot wait to see some cowboy rig OC'ers on the Mag Mile in Chicago. I will weep with joy when that happens. I'd also love to get a team going to record interactions with the cops when they flip out and falsely arrest someone for doing just that. The cops here are succeptible to getting sued for millions! Several years ago some Wisconsinites OC'ers went to a restaurant and drew the attention of the cops. One fearless guy refused to answer a question or provide identification and was arrested. He sued and won, though, I don't know how much he sued for. Its practically free money at the city's expense.
On the other hand, some idiot thug will try to mug one of 'em of their pistol and claim to be the victim when they get shot.
 
I am not a fan of open carry, especially poltically motivated open carry. I feel that it is unnessassarily provacative...

agreed. to me it's just another proverbial chest-thumping display that turns people off. it could also have a two pronged effect, if you're a criminal you're going to shoot the guy who you know has a gun, or, you'll garner unnecessary attention to yourself via the cops. doesn't seem like a very bright thing to do
 
One fearless guy refused to answer a question or provide identification and was arrested. He sued and won, though, I don't know how much he sued for. Its practically free money at the city's expense.

you mean at tax payer expense. who do you think pays for these petty lawsuits? I hate people that don't take personal responsibility for their actions.
 
agreed. to me it's just another proverbial chest-thumping display that turns people off. it could also have a two pronged effect, if you're a criminal you're going to shoot the guy who you know has a gun, or, you'll garner unnecessary attention to yourself via the cops. doesn't seem like a very bright thing to do

Oh, puhleeeaase. :rolleyes:
 
gaseousclay:
you mean at tax payer expense. who do you think pays for these petty lawsuits? I hate people that don't take personal responsibility for their actions.

Yep, tax payers that will get tired of their law enforcement not knowing the law, or breaking it, and costing them money. Hit 'em in the wallet. If I found out that my county law enforcers were losing my money by being unaware of the law, you think I'd be against the lawful person? Nope. I expect more from those I PAY !!!
 
Yep, tax payers that will get tired of their law enforcement not knowing the law, or breaking it, and costing them money.


And do what? Complain, write a nasty email?

Simple thing is guy files law suite, Judge slaps guy with fine for being a fool. Guy's fine pays for wasted tax payer dollars dealing with fool.

I was not raised to look a cop in the face and ignore his questions or refuse to cooperate with him. These guys all went in wearing their guns, fine. Someone calls the cops, fine, the cops come to check things out. That is their job guys. And this guy want's to be a fool and refuse to cooperate while the cops do their job.

Shoulda had his head thumped for being an idiot.

If any of you are one of these guys who open carries and has a buddy with a camera while you try to make a cop look bad while you push his buttons staying just inside the law yourself. Then you are part of the problem. I'd thump you on the head myself as a citizen.
 
And do what? Complain, write a nasty email?

Look up Danladi Moore in Norfolk VA. He sued the city twice, and won twice. I don't blame him. I blame a corrupt police system that thought they were above pre-emptive state law. You see Danny as a fool, I see him as a man standing for his rights and abiding by the due processes of the law. His rights were violated, and he fixed the system. Norfolk city police were told to stand down, not only from the citizens, but from the state government. It works.

I was not raised to look a cop in the face and ignore his questions or refuse to cooperate with him.

My momma never raised such a foolish child. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc

Shoulda had his head thumped for being an idiot.

Wow you must realllly hate the bill of rights! :rolleyes:

If any of you are one of these guys who open carries and has a buddy with a camera while you try to make a cop look bad while you push his buttons staying just inside the law yourself. Then you are part of the problem. I'd thump you on the head myself as a citizen.

I sure hope you don't carry, concealed or otherwise. You are not all there! :confused:
 
Last edited:
It is the duy of the dispatcher to get a read on what crime is being committed which resulted in 911 getting called. It is the duty of the dispatcher to say, "...but simply carrying a gun isn't illegal." to the caller. They don't do that. They send a battalion of cops to the scene.

Not answering the cops questions isn't grounds for getting arrested, especially if you were legally OC'ing. One can use this to further their agenda concerning getting cops to stop hassling OC'ers

Who is going to get the cops to ignore OC, as they should, instead of abusing OC'ers by shouting orders and humiliating Terry stops? The OC'er who meekly complies with the orders and hopes to get let off with a warning? Or the guy who, through noncompliance, get the cops to go 'all in' and make what turns out to be a false arrest?
 
Whats the point of not answering officer questions? Unless you're worried about a 5th A. issue identify yourself and simply state "we are utilizing our First Amendment rights to assemble and march, and using our Second Amendment rights as noted under [law permitting open carry] which is the subject of that march." It shouldn't be issue. No reason for the assemblers to be persnickity and no reason for the police to be persnickety.
 
In my state several bad open carry arrests have lead to successful lawsuits against the offending police departments. The Departments issued training bulletins and paid out large sums of money. As a result, open carriers are no longer falsely arrested and citizens are slowly becoming acclimated. Just like the anti-gunners cries of blood in the streets and wild-west shootouts, all of the anti-open carry exaggerations are coming to naught.
 
Who is going to get the cops to ignore OC, as they should, instead of abusing OC'ers by shouting orders and humiliating Terry stops? The OC'er who meekly complies with the orders and hopes to get let off with a warning? Or the guy who, through noncompliance, get the cops to go 'all in' and make what turns out to be a false arrest?

Why are you assuming its a false arrest? I don't know about all states, but I know here, failure to identify yourself will get you legally arrested, where they will sort out your identity. If they are lawful orders, they are lawful orders, and you will be arrested if you violate them.
 
but I know here, failure to identify yourself will get you legally arrested, where they will sort out your identity. If they are lawful orders, they are lawful orders, and you will be arrested if you violate them.

I think Brown v. Texas would disagree with your analysis as applied to legal OC or any legal activity.

Although I think the point is moot as far as Texas is concerned, as OC is not legal there correct?
 
1. You can be detained to establish your identification.
2. Failure to follow lawful orders can lead to an arrest under several methods including the joyously circular "resisting arrest."
3. OC: not that I am aware of for pistols. However not positive on that. I know in country, especially closer to the border its no big deal. ESPECIALLY in country near the border now. Long arms used to be fully legal. As a kid everyone with a truck had a long gun of some sort, and that mostly died out after a rash of thefts. I don't know if thats changed. I do know if you go walking through downtown Houston with a pistol you'll likely be swarmed and/or shot very quickly.
 
zincwarrior said:
Why are you assuming its a false arrest? I don't know about all states, but I know here, failure to identify yourself will get you legally arrested, where they will sort out your identity. If they are lawful orders, they are lawful orders, and you will be arrested if you violate them.


Most of these encounters that you see or hear about where the citizen is refusing to show ID are in states where ID is only required if you are detained. The officer in question either does not have RAS/PC and has not detained the citizen but is trying to intimidate them, or is ignorant of the law and is effecting an illegal detainment or arrest. These were the two most common causes of lawsuits in my area. And the lawsuits were necessary. Complaints to LEAs, prosecutors, mayors and so forth fell on deaf ears. Nothing, and I mean nothing but a lawsuit persuaded them to stop violating peoples' rights, even after they saw neighboring jurisdictions suffer the same consequences.

Not all of the citizens in the videos are necessarily being nice about it - there seem to be a lot of copycat videos out there where they are just trying to provoke the police - but here's the general scenario (This is not me, by the way: It's just an example):

It's legal in my area to OC (open carry) but the local police will try to intimidate anyone who tries. Numerous letters and phone calls have had no effect. It's always he said she said. Someone has to do something. From now on, when we open carry let's bring a camera and a voice recorder. If one of us gets hassled, the other should record.

Soon enough, another encounter, the officer does his same routine, figuring he'll scare another person into submission. What's this? He's not falling for it? Well maybe a little ride downtown will straighten him out.

What's this, a lawsuit? Great, what next. And of course what next is the mayor screaming at the police chief about how he's blown the city budget for the next decade and how would you like to be driving the same patrol cars five years from now?

The people who did this originally were taking a big risk, but with the hope that they could change the illegal behavior of the police. Some of them did for the greater good, some out of pure stubbornness. Most of them behaved respectfully and simply refused to be bullied. Some of them brought real change to their communities and forced the police back in line. When you think about it, most departments do require frequent praise and occasional discipline, the same way that a puppy or a politician would. At any rate, the later videos that you see all over YouTube are mostly folks copying this same concept, but not always as carefully or respectfully, and often at far less risk. Done wrong, all it does is cheese off LE and make you look like an [donkey].
 
Back
Top