I see your point - I don't doubt that at all. I mean, most (all?) classes you take to get CC permits, and other such handgun training classes, usually touch on the legal aspect of things in some capacity. Some courses spend an ample amount of time on this topic and it probably does spook people.I have this feeling, and it is just a feeling, that CCW folks (I am one) are being neuroticially spooked by shadows when it comes to this major fear of being sued in civil court following a legally justifiable shooting.
Most of your post was OK, curious though as to what you thought this line added to it?Do you have bad dreams or still have insecurity issues with the boogeyman?
Do you really want to kill someone over a car stereo, or even a car?'
Let’s cut to the chase. You asked what the law is, here’s how you find it.
Search on Google for “Texas Penal Code Section 9” (but without the quotes).
Drop down to sections 9.41 through 9.44 which have to do with protecting property.
Regardless of what the law says and/or what you believe it says, you must know additional information to apply the law:
1) What was the legislative intent of the law? What did the legislators formally record as the reasoning behind the law?
2) How has this law been interpreted and applied in every court case (both criminal and civil) in the State of Texas?
I can't determine the bad guys intent entirely. This is why I suggest not running outside like Dirty Harry. What are you talking about?Double Naught Spy said:Just how do you determine that the bad guys' only goal was to steal the car and/or its contents until they are actually trying to flee with the car and/or contents?
...lol. OK I won't. You ask not to have a response containing total situational awareness and precognition... yet your arguments are all "What if's" and other supposition?Double Naught Spy said:Please don't respond with answers like, "because they were breaking into the car and the only reason to do that is to steal it or its contents" or other such total situational awareness and precognition by the car's owner that he knows there are only two bad guys involved in this crime and that the crime is about stealing the car and/or its contents.
Just for argument's sake here, let's say thatguyjosh did find a couple of guys
What if said bad guys....
What if the two bad guys attempting the burgle the vehicle....
Pose any question you like. It's irrelevant to whether or not it's save to go outside and confront the unknown.Double Naught Spy said:This is one of those questions that keeps coming up over and over again that is just amazing to me. The question that should be asked isn't if I (the royal I) want to kill somebody over a car, car stereo, or other material object, but if the bad guy wants to risk getting himself killed over stealing something trivial relative to the value of his/her life such as a car, car stereo, or other material object.
Josh,
Do you have bad dreams or still have insecurity issues with the boogeyman? In my 11 yrs of LE- I've never actually seen "2 males dresses in black" breaking into anything. Maybe they do that in places, I don't know. But the thing is, you sound a little paranoid.
Josh,
Do you have bad dreams or still have insecurity issues with the boogeyman? In my 11 yrs of LE- I've never actually seen "2 males dresses in black" breaking into anything. Maybe they do that in places, I don't know. But the thing is, you sound a little paranoid.
I agree. I have insurance to take care of my car, and I have guns to take care of my home & family.2rugers said:Trip20. With your mindset it is probably best that you stay inside, lay low, and call 911.