jackmoser65
New member
The intent is different but the objective is identical. To create the most trauma possible and stop the target as quickly as possible. Like I just said, you guys are focused on intent and I'm talking about wound characteristics. Do you think the bullet cares if it passes through a human or a deer?Handgun hunting objectives hardly relate to self defense.
Any discussion about CNS hits is irrelevant. Are we reallly gonna get hung on a half inch wide target? Head shots? Or are we going to focus on the more realistic prospect of center of mass torso hits?
Do you really want to insult my intelligence with the "knocking deer down" anecdotal nonsense??? I ain't Joe-Bob at deer camp.
It is widely held, among those who actually do a lot of handgun hunting, that the .357 is rather marginal for deer. That larger cartridges like the .41 and .44 magnums are more appropriate, more effective and have a greater tendency to put game down more quickly. We don't know this because we read about it, heard it from Joe-Bob or came up with a wild theory. We know it because we tried it. Yet, in a self defense discussion, based entirely on theories and studies, "they're all the same"??? Don't whizz down my back and tell me it's raining. Anything we learn from hunting, actually killing critters, is far more useful and valid than anything gleaned from anecdotal nonsense, flawed studies or conjecture.