Walt Sherrill
New member
DannyB1954 said:I am not anti Glock, ( I have a G27), but when I compared the G19 to the Ruger, I got the Ruger SR9. I then went Ruger SR9C, and sold the full size.
The SR9c comes with a 17 round mag that you can carry if you feel you need more capacity. The mag disconnect can be removed easy, and the thumb safety is something that you get used to checking.
I could have written that, except that I've had a bunch of Glocks, most of which I really liked. (Except two Glock 35s, one of them well-tuned for competition before I traded into it.) I have never been able to shoot a Glock .40 worth a hoot -- even though it fit my hand EXACTLY like my Glock 34, which was great in every respect.
I first picked up an SR-9 (and early one, in trade) and had the Ghost Trigger Kit installed; the early SR-9s had ugly triggers. After that it was much better, but the trigger was/is still HEAVIER than I like. (There may be an easy solution, but I haven't sought it.) Then I picked up an SR-9c in trade, which I like a lot.
I'm now struggling, trying to decide which I want to use for carry, when I carry -- which isn't every day: an SR-9c or a CZ-P07.
The SR9c is a bit smaller than the P07, but not enough smaller to offset what I think is a slightly better trigger in the P07. I suspect it'll be a few more range sessions and days of carry, before I decide. The full-size SR9 will probably be sold or traded away, one of these days -- but it's a good gun.
I think Ruger's SR striker-fired guns do EVERYTHING the Glocks do as well as the Glocks, and they certainly point better. The Rugers just don't have the elegant SIMPLICITY of the Glock design.