Hmmm, got me thinking about a 7X57 now. See there is plenty of Remington Core Lokt available.Extremely mild, like a 243 without the sting.
Yeah, nobody wants to shoot one of those enough to wear one out.
Hmmm, got me thinking about a 7X57 now. See there is plenty of Remington Core Lokt available.Extremely mild, like a 243 without the sting.
Yeah, nobody wants to shoot one of those enough to wear one out.
Bergara's have the best trigger.IF I lost all my guns in a boating accident...I'd replace these three for sure.
Bergara Wilderness Terrain in 6.5CM
Defiance Tenacity in .280AI
Weatherby MkV UL in .338-06.
I do.I hope you reload. Haha.
I really don't know why, but I have never been a .300 WBY fan. It just never exceeded the .300 Win mag by enough to really impress me. The .30-378 is just brutal. The .300 Ultra just seems to be ideal. I really don't know what brass costs now for it, but I have a pile.I'm a huge weatherby fan too--I've spent time behind the trigger of vanguards and Mark 5's in 270 up to 416--so I have to ask--why did you go with the RUM instead of the 300 wby? Fortunately I reload for them--last time I looked the 416 was getting well north of $200 a box.
The only complaint I have is that I'm not entirely enamored to their new bolts, but have definitely noticed a significant improvement in their barrels since opening the new factory and doing all production in-house.
I do have a really nice accurate .22 as well, but I’ve become addicted to the .17HMR. I’ve been popping gophers out to 150+ yards with ease, and when this thing hits it’s all over. But in reality the .22 would be a more sensible choice if ammo cost and availability are factored in.I have the 6.5 Grendel and 270. Just have accumulated a lot of stuff here and there. Got the 22 LR for the little critters.
The biggest liability to owning Weatherbys IMO is that they tend to roast the throats and bores pretty fast if you shoot them any more frequently than the typical 3 shots two weeks before hunting season opener, I believe they set the headspace with the barrel and bolt upon manufacture. Getting a new barrel is a time and money consuming operation. The 270 weatherby is one of the best IMO.I just love Weatherbys. The one I am currently playing with is the 6.5X300. It is a screamer.
The biggest liability to owning Weatherbys IMO is that they tend to roast the throats and bores pretty fast if you shoot them any more frequently than the typical 3 shots two weeks before hunting season opener,
The biggest liability to owning Weatherbys IMO is that they tend to roast the throats and bores pretty fast if you shoot them any more frequently than the typical 3 shots two weeks before hunting season opener, I believe they set the headspace with the barrel and bolt upon manufacture. Getting a new barrel is a time and money consuming operation. The 270 weatherby is one of the best IMO.
They do--have you ever tried replacing one on a MK 5? If you use their in-line locking lug bolts it's not as trivial as a remage (assuming you get the nut off in good style). I love weatherby's--but they are not exactly easy for the typical shooter to replace the barrel.They do make new barrels!
I love weatherby's--but they are not exactly easy for the typical shooter to replace the barrel.
Considering I eliminate the barrel nut when I rebarrel Savages, no big liability there.They do--have you ever tried replacing one on a MK 5? If you use their in-line locking lug bolts it's not as trivial as a remage (assuming you get the nut off in good style). I love weatherby's--but they are not exactly easy for the typical shooter to replace the barrel.
That's a fact.and they were never made to be....
Oh, I already have. Marlin 336C 30-30.
- A decent 22 rimfire.
- A 30-'06 Springfield or 270 Winchester; either will do.
Three is more than you need, but perhaps a 223 might be useful. If you get too many, it becomes a collection of stuff that you don't use. Save room for a lever-gun, though.