Old can of 2400

"Mike Irwin in post 27, how can old powder maybe 20-40 years old are whatever have pressure spikes that go through the roof ?
had to laugh when I read that one. hahaha Yea you can hear alot of stuff like that in LGS's that make you laugh."

Yes, you hear a lot in local gunshops that makes you laugh...

Like the 1911 is the world's greatest handgun ever...

A bullet rises above the axis of the bore when it's fired...

And gunpowder is like Twinkees, it never ages.

Obviously you've been listening to the old pharts and eating their Twinkees...

You also missed the part of the discussion where this powder is a lot closer to 60 years old than 20 or 30. And we have no idea how it's been stored over those years.

So, tell us, BuckRub, where did you get your PhD in Physical Chemistry/Chemical Engineering?

Where's your testing lab?

Where are your reams of data backing up what you think you know?

I see others have taken to heart Slamfire's extensive research on the subject of old powder and what can happen to it when it degrades.

I, too, used to think the same way as you, that powder was either ageless and perfectly fine, or as it decayed it lost power and simply faded away.

Like most here, I've fired thousands of rounds of ammunition loaded with powder made when Stalin was still knocking about the Kremlin, and Truman was chewing MacArthur's ass all over Asia.

I'll very likely continue to do so in my military surplus guns (read: Guns I really don't care about).

But I won't do it with the guns I DO care about, my Smith & Wessons, my Remingtons, my Savages.

What you do with your guns is your own business.

But please don't fall into the trap of thinking that just because you can't conceive of it that someone else hasn't already put a serious dent in your beliefs.
 
"In the case of a powder getting more powerful as it decays, I'd bet good money against it, in any specific case, but I wouldn't bet a penny that it could never happen."

OK, 44, you appear to have fallen into as big a misconception as the one that's swallowed up Buck Rub.

The powder doesn't get MORE powerful...

The potential is there for its inherent power to be released a LOT faster than is intended.

Most modern powders are made with chemicals that stabilize the powder to keep it from decaying prematurely and other chemicals that moderate its burning rates. In other words, those chemicals slow down how fast the powder burns, which is what makes it useful in the cartridge its in.

As powder ages, the stabilizers are consumed, and the deterrent chemicals can either be consumed by the ongoing chemical reaction or they may simply no longer be up to the job.

If that happens, the powder's burning rate can skyrocket, meaning that pressure can not follow the intended curve, but can spike dramatically.

Slamfire has some charts somewhere done by, I believe, the US Army's ballistics people, that shows those pressure spikes.
 
"Graphite is used to make powder safe to handle. It keeps friction down as well as static electricity. If the powder still has a good coating of graphite, it is ok to use."

Incorrect.

Powder decays from the inside out.

By the time the graphite coating (which is NOT a deterrent coating) is affected, the powder is already SEVERELY compromised.
 
So, tell us, BuckRub, where did you get your PhD in Physical Chemistry/Chemical Engineering?

Where's your testing lab?

Where are your reams of data backing up what you think you know?




Sometimes you can have all the PhD's in the world and still not have a lick of "COMMON SENSE". I know of a few that have multiple degree's and still not have enough sense to pour water out their boot. hahaha
So if Im ever shooting and blow my gun to crap with say Bullseye, Im not even going to guess about a double charge. Im gonna say that sorry gun store sold me some "Old" powder ! hahaha But thanks for the Laugh, Everyone needs one every once in awhile. :)
 
I still have 5 1/2lbs of 2400 in cans like that. Got it in a trade for cheap, and it shoots great.
Granted, my cans dont look quite so dirty. Mine are still in good shape.
 
The fact the the can has been opened for 50-60 years and comes from a source that is unknown, I'd be hesitant to waste the bullets to seat over the top of it.
 
I say I would not worry about if there is some rust on the outside of the can.If it smell the way it should> I say do like was stated do some test rounds and go from there but start with the starter load first.Also as for what is stated about powder not go up in age I have shot a old factory 410 round that was paper in a bolt action and the breach blow up on me.I did not know how long my dad had them.I was young back then many years ago.I think back in the early 70's.
 
plus another - if it looks good and smells good go for it. I have used powder fromt he 60's and 70's. Also, if they don't smell good they STILL make great fertilizer.
 
I bet none of the folks saying "don't use it" would hesitate to shoot up WWII surplus ammo, not knowing how it was stored

If it smells right and looks right, use it
 
I knew nothing about gunpowder lifetime until I ran into an Insensitive Munitions expert. This IM expert explained that powder deteriorates from the day it leaves the factory.

Nitrocellulose decomposes through the reduction-oxidation process. Called Redox. The expert said “The molecular stability of the functional groups on the organic chain determine the life time of the nitrocellulose molecule.” All ionic compounds, water is the main offender because it is always in air, react with those bonds and accelerates the deterioration of the powder.

The bottom line is that nitrocellulose is a high energy molecule that wants to become a low energy molecule.

Heat accelerates the deterioration/decomposition of powder and the rate is directly proportional to the Arrhenius equation. If you read in the Insensitive munitions literature, you will see that they use high temperature to accelerate aging of smokeless propellants.

ROLE OF DIPHENYLAMINE AS A STABILIZER IN PROPELLANTS;
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY OF DIPHENYLAMINE IN PROPELLANTS
Nitrocellulose-base propellants are essentially unstable materials
that decompose on aging with the evolution of oxides of nitrogen. The
decomposition is autocatalytic and can lead to failure of the ammunition or disastrous explosions.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/783499.pdf

Heat, as you can see in the report, will age gunpowder

Propellantaging.jpg


Combustion pressures will rise after high temperature storage.

INVESTIGATION OF THE BALLISTIC AND CHEMICAL STABILITY OF 7.62MM AMMUNITION LOADED WITH BALL AND IMR PROPELLANT

Frankfort Arsenal 1962

3. Effects of Accelerated Storage Propellant and Primer Performance

To determine the effect of accelerated isothermal storage upon propellant and primer performance, sixty cartridges from each of lots E (WC 846) and G (R 1475) were removed from 150F storage after 26 and 42 weeks, respectively. The bullets were then removed from half the cartridges of each lot and from an equal number of each lot previously stored at 70F. The propellants were then interchanged, the bullets re-inserted, and the cases recrimped. Thus, four variations of stored components were obtained with each lot.

Chamber pressures yielded by ammunition incorporating these four variations were as follows. These values represent averages of 20 firings.



Pressurevariationsduetostoragetempertures-1.jpg



UN manual on ammunition inspection. See section 7.3.

Surveillance and in-service proof - the United Nations
http://www.un.org/disarmament/conva...20-Surveillance_and_In-Service Proof(V.1).pdf




Double based powders have a reduced lifetime compared with single base. Double based powders have nitroglycerin (NG) in the grain. Nitroglycerine remains a liquid and it migrates within the grain to react with the NO bonds on the nitrocellulose, increasing the rate of reduction-oxidation reaction. All ionic compounds react with those bonds and accelerate the deterioration of the powder. Rust is bad as ferric oxide is ionic. Water is polar covalent ion and it reacts with the double bonds.

Because water reacts in a negative way with smokeless propellants, quality ammunition is manufactured in humidity controlled environments. Between 40% and 20% humidity. They don't go lower due to electro static discharge concerns.

The best storage condition for powders is arctic. Cold and dry.

Due to the migration of NG within double based powders, the surface of the grain will become rich in NG even though the total energy content of the propellant has decreased. This will cause changes in the burn rate, and can cause pressures to spike. The surface of nitrocellulose powders also change as the powder deteriorates, and it changes unevenly. This creates conditions for erratic burn rates. Burn rate instability is undesirable and can cause explosive conditions in firearms. In retrospect, this explains the “funny” retorts I experienced and the sticking cases. It is an extremely rare occurrence, but old ammunition has caused rifle Kabooms. When I discussed this with a machine gunner buddy, he said that explained the two top cover explosions he had with old Yugoslavian 8 MM ammo. I think it explains the Garand kaboom in the link below.

Section from the Propellant Management Guide:

Stabilizers are chemical ingredients added to propellant at time of manufacture to
decrease the rate of propellant degradation and reduce the probability of auto ignition during its expected useful life.

As nitrocellulose-based propellants decompose, they release nitrogen oxides. If the nitrogen oxides are left free to react in the propellant, they can react with the nitrate ester, causing further decomposition and additional release of nitrogen oxides. The reaction between the nitrate ester and the nitrogen oxides is exothermic (i.e., the reaction produces heat). Heat increases the rate of propellant decomposition. More importantly, the exothermic nature of the reaction creates a problem if sufficient heat is generated to initiate combustion. Chemical additives, referred to as stabilizers, are added to propellant formulations to react with free nitrogen oxides to prevent their attack on the nitrate esters in the propellant. The stabilizers are scavengers that act rather like sponges, and once they become “saturated” they are no longer able to remove nitrogen oxides from the propellant. Self-heating of the propellant can occur unabated at the “saturation” point without the ameliorating effect of the stabilizer. Once begun, the self-heating may become sufficient to cause auto ignition.


NOx gas is a mix of compounds all of which are reactive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_oxide When smokeless propellants break down NOx gas is released. Nitric acid gas is only produced in the presence of water, because it requires a hydronimun ion, but there is plenty of water in air.

The Armed Forces have stockpile surveillance programs but each Service does theirs a little differently. If you want to see all the different tests the military uses to determine propellant characteristics, look at Mils Std 286 Propellants, Solid: Sampling, Examination and Testing to be found at https://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/.

If you look, you will find aging tests. One common test is for powder to be kept at 65 C (150 F) until it fumes. It if fumes within 30 days it is checked for stabilizer or scrapped.

The Navy expert told me a few ways the Navy samples its powders and propellants. If the powder is outgassing nitric gas (as determined by change of color of methly violet paper in contact with the powder (Methly Violet test, or Talliani test)), the stuff is tested to see how much stabilizer is left. If the amount is less than or equal to 20%, the lot is scrapped.

Scrapping powders and propellants with this percentage of stabilizer appears to be consistent across all services.

Pages 5-11 of the 2003 Army Logistics Propellant Management Guide provide the protocols for testing and subsequent actions for their Stockpile Propellant Program. Basically, all propellant lots are tracked. The trigger for investigation is: "When Master Sample Stability Failure Occurs"

The Navy expert provided 'rules of thumb' concerning when to expect problems with double based and single based propellants. The rules of thumb are: Double based powders and ammunition are scrapped at 20 years, single based 45 years. In his words “These 'rules of thumb' are particularly useful when the protocol fails. The protocol can easily fail when workmanship or good housekeeping measures are not followed during manufacture of propellant and/or rocket motor or during storage of the weapon system components, respectively.”

Early in the last century the storage lifetime of smokeless powders was considered to be 20 years or less:

Army Ordnance Magazine, June 1931, page 445 says:

“Smokeless powder constitutes one of the greatest hazards from a storage standpoint, due to the fact that it is subject to deterioration and at the best cannot be expected to have a life greater than about twenty years…….Master samples of all lots of smokeless powder are under constant observation in the laboratories at Picatinny Arsenal. Should any of these samples indicate rapid deterioration, notification is given at once, and steps are taken to use this deteriorating material within a very short period, if possible, or else withdraw it from service.”


For the home reloader, if the powder has turned red, or smells like acid, it is way beyond its safe limits. However, gunpowder and ammunition that has not obviously “bad” it becomes very hard to know the risk. I have, as all of us, shot ammunition from WW2, Korea, Vietnam era. I had pressure issues with Iraqi 303 ball, 8mm surplus, but I did not know at the time what was causing the pierced primers. I have shot 60’s vintage Bullseye, the stuff shot well and chronographed very consistently. But I have also shot surplus IMR 4895 that had no smell and that powder had pressure issues. CMP shooters report pressure problems with Greek ball in the 70’s.

I wish I could give a simple number for the lifetime of gunpowder, 10 years, 20 years, 30 years, but I can’t. There are too many variables, from the factory floor, to how the powder has been stored. This is what Federal says is the lifetime of their ammunition:

http://www.federalpremium.com/company/faq.aspx

What is the shelf life of ammo and storage?
Store reloading components and ammunition in a cool, dry place, protected from direct exposure to sunlight. If stored properly there is a 10-year shelf life on loaded ammunition.


But, for the curious, all you have to do is Google “Insensitive Munitions”, surplus ammunition Kabooms, and you will find much more than what I have put into this thread.


More to read if you wish:

www.dtic.mil/dticasd/sbir/sbir031/n154.doc

This paper discusses most of what I have written, but it has a confusing section where it states that “Suddenly, propellant that has spent its entire life in a configuration that was considered inherently safe from the risk of auto ignition is now bulk packaged and stored in a concentrated mass that may be sufficient to allow auto ignition to occur.” After discussions with the Navy expert I found that the insensitive munitions community has its own myths and legends. There are groups within the IM community who promote the “5 inch” rule. The theory is that for munitions 5 inch and smaller, the thermal mass of the case is sufficient to wick away heat and prevent auto ignition. The Navy expert considers this theory to be bogus and created by self serving individuals who get cash awards when they “extend the shelf life” of propellants. Never doubt the power of greed.



http://www.almc.army.mil/alog/issues/JulAug08/propellant_stab_eq.html

The pictures in this thread are just amazing, and evidence of powder that has deteriorated to the point that nitric acid gas is corroding the cases. And the reloader had pressure problems:

http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3745264

Has anyone else had Vihtavuori N140 corrode in loaded ammo?
I pulled two boxes (100 rounds total) of .308 ammo out of the safe I loaded about ten years ago and found some of them had blue powdery stuff coming out of the necks. I pulled a few rounds down and the inside case walls were powdery blue. The base of the bullets were corroded and blue. None of the other .308 ammo in the safe loaded with Varget has this problem. None of my pistol ammo looks to have anything wrong, but I haven't unloaded any of them. None of my blued guns have any rust. It's not a moist environment issue.

I've never had this happen before. Spent a lot of money loading this ammo for my AR-10 and used new brass, CCI BR2 primers, and N140 powder. It's all junk now.

What made me check it was I shot my AR-10 that's been sitting idle for about 8 years. Same ammo as what's in the boxes I checked. Out of the first ten rounds from the mag that was in the gun three blew primer pockets. I unloaded the rest of the cartridges and they were corroded.

I googled it and found one instance where someone else had the same thing happen
As for shooting WW2 era ammunition, take a look at this Garand Kaboom:

http://www.socnet.com/showthread.php?p=1344088

Another Garand Blowup with WWII ball

http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=7870113&postcount=13

I have an old shooting buddy who some years ago was shooting some WWII ball (don’t know whose) but his M-1 was disassembled in a rather rapid fashion. He was lucky only his pride was hurt. He said he took a round apart and found rust looking dust along with the powder. Bad powder. Just sayin…..The op rod can be rebuilt which might be a good way to go. Op Rods are getting harder to find and when you find one a premium price is required so it seems. Garands require grease. I’m not sure if you are aware of this. If you are, please no offence taken.

http://www.usrifleteams.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=21886


Posted 17 July 2012 - 01:29 PM
'Tailgunner', on 17 Jul 2012 - 13:16, said:

I picked up some surplus ammo a couple of years ago and had a couple of hang fires. The hammer would drop and a second later the rifle would discharge.

After that happened a couple of times, I decided I wasn't going to shoot that stuff any more. So I took the ammo apart, thinking I'd at least salvage the brass. After I'd pulled all of the bullets and dumped the powder, I tried chucking the primed cases in a vice and then hit the primers with a pin punch and a hammer.
I found that some of the primers would "pop" but others would just sizzle and smoke. I'm pretty sure those were my hang fires. It was an interesting experiment

The last surplus ammo I had looked so bad that I never fired any of it. Like you, I took it apart. The powder was clumped together. The base of the bullet was green with corrosion. I decapped all the brass, burned the primers and powder outside when burning rubbish, and sold the brass and bullets to a scrap company. Recouped a very small amount of initial price. That was the last time I got fooled on surplus ammo crap.

My guess is that most of the foreign countries that are selling surplus goods to the USA, don't care much about how they handle or store the items, as long as it gets on the shipping container and they pocket the purchase price, they are happy. Caveat emptor is Latin for "Let the buyer beware." It especially applies to surplus goods that have a shelf life. Where was it stored? How was it stored? What temperature? Subjected to water or salt air? Exposed to a structure fire? How was it transported? Etc. etc...too many unanswered questions. A deal that is too good to be true, usually is too good to be true.

http://www.gunandgame.com/forums/powder-keg/38539-those-think-old-ammo-still-ok-print.html

For those that think old ammo is still ok....

A buddy of mine took his Sig p220 .45 down the range with us the other weekend. He had some old winchester hollowpoints that looked like they had been buried for 30 years. With myself still being new to guns and shooting, i didnt think anything about it.

Well he took one shot and it blow up in his hand. Now he has shot numerous rounds through this gun without a problem, of course they were new. Anyway, noone was hurt but the sig. This is hte way the gun is stuck in. It will not budge. Id say its a nice new paperwieght

100_2685.jpg

http://www.thehighroad.org/showpost.php?p=7756780&postcount=6

Although it's remotely possible that a defective load (very unlikely if factory ammo) or poorly stored ammo that had deterioated. I had some H450 go bad and an "accuracy" load from a .30/06 w/180gr bullet locked up the bolt and removed case looked like a belted magnum...... but gun was unharmed.... primer was blown however and pitted the bolt face...... I pulled down the rest of the ammo and powder "stunk" like vinegar and inside of cases were turning green from acid corrosion..... Ammo had only been loaded 6mos earlier... and powder looked and smelled "ok" then.


http://www.ramanon.com/forum/showthread.php?57650-Bad-7-62x25-Ammo

Bad Bad 7.62x25 Ammo

You have probably read my recent thread on a CZ-52 and FTF problems. I expected it was the pistol that had the problem. A few days ago I took it to the range again with the same can of mil-surp ammo after polishing suspect surfaces in the pistol as the possible cause of its problem.

Right away I had the same FTF problem. The slide would not quite close all the way on a round. I had to nudge the slide fully into battery all too often.

So I began to think of other possible causes of the FTF and examined the ammo I was firing. I might have the answer. The surplus 7.62x25 ammo had cracks in the brass of unfired ammo! Often right where a dimple was is in the case that held the bullet head into the case. Sometimes sizeable cracks between the dimples.

Take a look at these unfired cartridges and the cracks. This defective ammo could explain my feeding problem…….

An example of powder that went bad in the can:

http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4702804#post4702804

4895 gone bad? ________________________________________
I just opened a one pound can of IMR 4895, stamped E91 on the bottom (1991?) L7867. The can was sealed and stored in a cool, dry basement room. I immediately noticed a significant amount of fine brown dust throughout the power. It left a notable brown dust type substance on my power funnel, and I decided not to use it. I asked a friend and he has had the same thing (not sure if its actually the same stuff) in some 4831. I could just toss it out to play safe, but this stuff isn't that cheap anymore.
http://thefiringline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=472369
 
One of the biggest problems with early (infancy) smokeless powder production was that it was an entirely new manufacturing process and not well understood.

Some batches of nitro powders would start to decay within days of production, and sometimes resulted in fires.

Some years ago I read that it wasn't uncommon for the Army to reject 4 out of 5 lots of powder for the .30-40 Krag, primarily because the manufacturing process hadn't matured yet.

The Model 1894 Winchester was originally supposed to be rolled out with the .30-30 and .25-35 as smokeless companions to the black powder .32-40 and .38-55, but not enough of the new smokeless powder was available in 1894 due to the same kinds of production issues.


Not that long ago I, too, was quite dubious about the claims that smokeless would do anything other than get less powerful as it decayed.

Then Slamfire started posting from a multitude of resources, and I gave that a serious rethink.
 
Not that long ago I, too, was quite dubious about the claims that smokeless would do anything other than get less powerful as it decayed.

Then Slamfire started posting from a multitude of resources, and I gave that a serious rethink.

Well I am glad I am making a difference. On another website the “Ayatollah’s of Ignorance” have shouted me down concerning slamfires and primer sensitivities. Sometimes people just don’t want to know to know the risks. Also, this website has a higher concentration of technically, or even just College educated posters. On the other website where the average education is not much higher than "Monkey See, Monkey Do", big, dumb, Gorillas rule. :rolleyes:

I, like everyone else thought that gunpowder went benign as it got older. But that is because our information sources are from the gun industry and they really don’t want us to get educated on things. They want us to buy, and buy without being picky about the age of the stuff we are buying.

It came as a shock to find that gunpowder not only ages, but the older stuff will blow up your firearm because of burn rate instability. As I found in my discussions with a Naval Insensitive Munitions expert, and then found DTIC documents which verified everything, old ammunition has its risks.

I have also been able to talk to people who provide flying targets to the military. These targets can be old aircraft and old, out of inventory missiles. The most common propellant used in missiles is solid propellant and it is based on the same stuff we use in gunpowder: Nitrocellulose. Unless you have direct contact with these guys you have no idea just how many of these old missiles malfunction. In September, the guy I was talking to, as a part of the tests he was involved with, one had gone short, one had blown up in flight, and one went long. These were all 100 mile plus trajectories so these were not bottle rockets. The missiles in question had been “certified” through inspection techniques, but guess what, there is considerable uncertainty about the quality of the propellant even after inspection. These missles were 30 years old.

From what I learned it is obvious that the turret explosion in the Iowa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Iowa_turret_explosion was due to old, decaying gunpowder that either self ignited, (because it was fuming), or the surface was sensitized due to nitroglycerine migration. Either way the turret explosion was due to old gunpowder. A little bit of education makes it obvious that the Navy's conclusion that the explosion was due to a gay Sailor (he was not) committing suicide (never proven) killing sixty some odd ships mates because he was depressed, somewhat ridiculous. http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/IOWA.html .

One should never take solid propellants for granted, especially in bulk. A gentleman I know was at a facility where the propellant for a new Peacekeeper missile went off. It is not really known if sawing through the chunks with a wire saw caused the propellant to self ignite, but that is the most likely cause, as no one was tossing matches or smoking in the test cell.


In 1982, a Peacekeeper stage 2 failed during a test at AEDC. This was a new booster being tested as a Production Assurance Quality Test. Ignition failure occurred during the burn test and approximately 60,000 lbs of unburnt propellant fell out of the booster into the bottom of the test cell. Aerojet, the booster maker, recommended that the unburnt propellant be cut with a wire saw and the chunks physically lifted out of the containment cell. Safety’s recommendation was to keep the propellant wet but this was not implemented. It is not known if keeping the propellant wet would have prevented the ignition of the last 30,000 lbs of propellant in the cell. Three Aerojet employees and one AEDC contract employee were in the cell when the propellant ignited.

This report confirms the accident but sort of dances around the issue of four dead people:

HAZARDS OF ALTITUDE TESTING AT AEDChttp://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a511703.pdf


Just a little static electricity can set a rocket off!

Technical Investigation of 11 January 1985 PERSHING II Motor Firehttp://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADP005343

3 Gis Killed In Missile Accident:fuel Fireleaves 7 Injured
January 12, 1985|By James M. Markham, The New York Times

BONN — The solid-fuel motor of an unarmed Pershing 2 missile caught fire and burned during a training exercise in southern Germany Friday, killing three American soldiers and injuring seven others, the U.S. Army announced.
The accident was the most serious so far involving the American-built ballistic missiles, and it seemed certain to sharpen West German anxieties over the issue of nuclear weapons stationed in the country. The Pershings were first deployed in late 1983 after heated controversy in West Germany.
 
Oddly enough, Slamfire, that bit about the missile propellant made me remember a scenario from Tom Clancey's Red Storm Rising, in which an Air Force pilot is told that the anti-satellite missile she's carrying under her F-15 SHOULD be OK.

She's told that the solid propellant has some microcracks in it, but when the propellant starts to decay the motor will just fizzle out.

When she gets back from her mission, she informs everyone that the rocket motor didn't fizzle out, it exploded and just about took out both her and her F-15...
 
Sorry that I came to the party late, but that is not PISTOL powder, but old Herk 2400 RIFLE powder. It would not be a good idea to use it in 357 Mags - unless you have some of the old load data for a lever action rifle in 357 Mag.

Again "THIS IS NOT ALLIANT 2400 POWDER".

The pressure spike will be beyond what your revolver can handle.

Jim
 
Sorry that I came to the party late, but that is not PISTOL powder, but old Herk 2400 RIFLE powder. It would not be a good idea to use it in 357 Mags - unless you have some of the old load data for a lever action rifle in 357 Mag.

Again "THIS IS NOT ALLIANT 2400 POWDER".

The pressure spike will be beyond what your revolver can handle.

Jim

Izzat right!??

Same stuff, whether it's Hercules or Alliant. When Alliant took over from Hercules, they made the same powder on the same machines to the same burn rate it had always been. See any words that say the SAME thing? 2400 powder is more versatile than you think it is. It's been used in .357, 41 mag, 44 mag .45 colt and many other handgun calibers. Yes, it works well in .22 hornet, .30 carbine and some other rifle cartridges.

I would at least try the O.P.'s powder in my ruger .357 mag, or 44 mag. At the lowest starting, IF it was fastER burning, it would not be dangerous.
 
"Sorry that I came to the party late, but that is not PISTOL powder, but old Herk 2400 RIFLE powder. It would not be a good idea to use it in 357 Mags - unless you have some of the old load data for a lever action rifle in 357 Mag.

Again "THIS IS NOT ALLIANT 2400 POWDER".

The pressure spike will be beyond what your revolver can handle."


Sorry, Jim, but that is incorrect.

You are correct that this is not Alliant 2400, but it is Hercules 2400, which is the same basic powder.

When 2400 was first introduced in the late 1920s or 1930s, it was intended first and foremost for small, modern smokeless rifle cartridges like the .22 Hornet and .218 Bee and also found use in .410 shotshell loads.

Cartridges like the .357 Magnum did not yet exist.

My Speer No. 3 reloading guide shows a picture of a can of 2400, which is clearly marked 2400 Rifle Powder.

However, in the propellant write up section it says: "Hercules 2400: This propellant is a good selection for small capacity rifle, large capacity pistol cartridges, and .410 shotshells."

No distinction is made between a 2400 rifle powder and a 2400 handgun powder, because there was none. It was the same propellant finding uses across a broad spectrum.

There are many powders that have had that capacity -- Red Dot, Unique, IMR 4227 (also developed specifically for the .22 Hornet), WW 296, and others as well.

In the loading data section, Speer Number 3 shows 2400 loads for not only .357 Magnum, but also .38 Special, .44 Special, .44 Magnum, and even the .45 Auto Rim.
 
The back label.......

What I noticed is that the back of the can mentions certain calibers, no doubt quite popular when the powder was sold. Not mentioned: 44 Magnum and 357 magnum. Makes me wonder if that can of powder is older than those two calibers. Pre-1935? I've used quite a bit of old powders and rejected a few. So far so good. Without actually examining the powder, I'd probably sprinkle that one in the garden. I've used some WWII surplus H-4831 and H-4895 recently that was in excellent condition and performed safely and well. I very much appreciate Slamfire's posts on this subject and intend to be discriminating about future purchases.
 
"Makes me wonder if that can of powder is older than those two calibers. Pre-1935?"

No, I don't think so. I'm pretty sure that it is post World War II.

John Taffin seems to describe the same type of can in an article here: http://americanhandgunner.com/web-blast-handloading/

But what Taffin doesn't describe is the art on the can.

Prior to World War II the graphics on the cans were significantly different than they were after the war, more like what is on this can of Unique: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Bul...der-Hercules-Ammunition-Box-Tin-/221359529386

It appears that after the war the color schemes became simpler and less vibrant (the 1950s were the era of pastels), sort of like these early 1960s cans: http://www.ebay.com/itm/5-Vintage-G...n-Powder-Bullseye-Pistol-Powder-/321303351560
 
Mike -

I would have also guessed the can to be from post-WWII as the gentleman from whose estate I received it was born around 1920. Of course, there's no telling where he got it. He was a collector, a rifle builder of some local repute and a reloader.

The label is paper rather than being imprinted right on the metal can, however the can design (wide mouth) itself very much resembles the older can of Bullseye you found on eBay.

It also looks very much like the can mentioned in the John Taffin article, but that can appears to have the graphics printed directly on the metal rather than on a paper label.

The .22 Hornet mentioned on the label was "released" in 1930, so it must date from the '30s or later. However, it doesn't mention the .218 Bee, which was released in 1938.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top