Oh, horrors - the G43

The Shield model without a thumb safety is (IMHO, of course) about as perfect as a small, slim, single-stack 9mm can get.

A single-stack 9mm Glock, the size of a Shield (or of a Glock42), would be an excellent addition to the marketplace, and likely every bit as "perfect"

Fans and purists will just have to have it. It'll sell well.

For those already owning a Shield or something similar, there isn't really a practical reason to trade or switch.
 
Those of us who carry the PPS have no need of any of the guns included in this thread. Is my nose pointed high enough?:p
 
I carried a PPS... its not as small as people make it out to be, def not a pocket gun, unless you have pretty big pockets, i do not, nice gun none the less, i regret selling mine.
 
Ruger LC9s Pro. What's not to like? 7 round mag. Dang nice trigger. Lost that freakin' safety and mag disconnect. Weighs in at about 17 oz.

I am in the market for a G42 though...for my recoil sensitive wife.
 
Maybe I hold off on looking for a lc9s for the time being.
I'd be interested in finding out how many of the parts will/would be compatible with the rest of their line up. It would be nice of it would still use the standard springs, trigger groups, and whatnot.
 
As a fan of Glock pistols and the owner of both a S&W Shield and Springfield Armory XDs in 9mm...I am very much looking forward to the Glock 43.:D
 
Ruger LC9s Pro

The problem I have with the LC9 is the break... often, and wear themselves out quickly. I deal with quite a bit of them being returned with issues to be sent to Ruger for their famous "warranty inspection" 9 times outa 10 (read not always always) Ruger takes care of them, but I've had them charge a few customers, but that's nothing new.

Not ragging on your gun but based on how many we sold vs we see with issues, i wouldn't trust one, that and the trigger is awful on the LC9 and LCP. I had an LCP I got FOR FREE from the Ruger 4R program for dealers, and i still sold it.:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top