Why? "Because" or perhaps, "Why Not?" or "Because we can"
dougbull said:
No rapid fire !!!
I have 2 gun ranges around here, one indoor one outdoor. they each have signs on every lane posted stating NO RAPID FIRE !!! What I cant for the life of me figure out is why? What difference does it make? thanks NRA MEMBER
What does the Rangemaster say?
We have one outdoor range in Anchorage that disallows rapid fire because the range is within earshot of homes and they get complaints.
The range is operated by the State of Alaska and is mandated for hunter safety (principally for sighting in) and since the range is there collateral activities like shotgunning and target shooting (both handguns and rifles).
But they also have other rules like "Only 10 rounds per magazine".
I suspect it is because it is easier to control a compliant population accustomed to lots and lots of rules, whether they make sense or not.
I can understand a desire for control. Dictators need it to stay in power. Megalomaniacs desire it by definition. Rangemasters need it for safety. (See Technosavant's excellent answer.)
I recall an accidental death at one range, where a lady was firing a 500 S&W for the first time. After the first shot, in recovering from the recoil she pulled the trigger a second time. By the time she did, though, the gun was in full recoil and pointed behind her. The bullet fatally wounded a guy who was behind the firing line. Sorry, I cannot cite the time, place and source. I knew it once, but lost the citation.
My point is, Ask. If you have a legitimate reason, you may be granted an exception. If your reason is very good, whoever is in authority may change the rule. (Get a copy of Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People".)
Lost Sheep