Your answer makes me wonder why you stated your opinion in the form of questions. ;-)For me, the answer is no...
I agree that if KT put another $50-$100 into "finishing" the P11 as in the KTOG Fluff & Buff, buyers would be more satisfied. However, the fact remains that it's an aluminum frame mounted in a plastic grip hosting a steel slide. That was necessary to achieve the design weight goal, but it's not realistic to expect Sig or Baretta durability from steel on aluminum.My first carry gun was a Kel-Tec P11. It was ALMOST a very good gun. If Kel-Tec added another $50-$100 to the price of their guns (and added $50-$100 more quality) they would be very good carry pieces. But they don't. If the price of a Kel-Tec is all that someone can afford, then go ahead and get it. BUT, if you can afford a higher priced gun, why settle for less? Before anyone says, "Is higher priced any better?", answer this question:
Would anyone here say that Kel-Tec's guns are as durable/reliable as a Glock, Sig, Beretta, etc?
It's a very simple question. If you don't want to answer it, that's OK.Have I ever owned a Kel-tec?? You're joking---Right?? Let's just say I don't like wasting my hard earned dollar.
If not, for $230.00 you can obtain a Makarov in .380 or the original 9x18mm for no more than $150, and still have enough money for defensive ammo. Or you can get the ligther, FEG PA-63 in .380 or 9x18mm, for no more than $125 and again money left for ammuntion. Or, if one can be found, a used S&W Model 10 or derivative for $150-$200 in .38 Special.