My 1911 has ruined me

From a combat, serious use perspective, they were meant to be used DAO. Once you learn to shoot them that way, you probably wont bother with that SA notch much anyway, at least thats been my experience. Theres really no need, and many police departments came to that conclusion as well towards the end of the revolvers reign in police guns. They rendered normally DA guns incapable of SA fire altogether.

Slow fire target shooting, maybe, but I think once you see how well you can shoot them DAO, even there, you'd be amazed at how well you can shoot.

With a heavy recoiling handgun, like a .44mag with heavy loads, you will often actually see improvement shooting DAO over SA. It was what first got me started shooting them that way 40 some odd years ago, after an old family friend suggested it, when he saw I was having difficulty with flinching with my 4" Model 29, which had a very, VERY light SA trigger. My groups, especially at longer ranges, shrank considerably once I started shooting DAO with that gun, and others that followed.

When you know that gun is going off as soon as you touch the trigger, and whats to follow, doesnt do much for your accuracy. Stroking the trigger and focusing on what you should be focusing on, the sights and target, give a surprise break and no flinching or other problems. You can also shoot the gun very quickly, and accurately. Jerry Mickulek is a perfect example of how the tecnique works.
 
My groups, especially at longer ranges, shrank considerably once I started shooting DAO with that gun, and others that followed.

I have found the same. I can stack rounds with my model 19-5 in DA. When I start thumb-cocking the hammer they open up as I start anticipating the shot. I have to shoot the SA continuously for a number of rounds before I settle back in.
 
When you go to the range, take a handgun which is not a 1911, like a striker fired semi-auto or double action revolver. Shoot that gun first. Then switch to the 1911. I don't always do this but find it helps when I do so.
 
A trigger is a trigger. The inferior part of the equation, is usually the shooter.

Not all triggers are created equally. Two triggers on two guns of the same model can be substantially different. In fact, if all triggers were truly equal there would be no need to argue for having to learn to shoot a DAO well.

Physics dictates that, everything else being equal (it never is), a 5-lb (a nominal pull for SA) trigger on a 2-lb handgun will be more precise than a 10-lb (a nominal pull for DA) trigger on such a handgun.

Triggerphobia seems to be a common thing these days, and you usually hear the complaints about other than SA triggers, from people who are inexperienced with anything but the SA triggers, and have never bothered to learn to shoot anything else (especially when you consider that it really only takes a little time and effort to learn to shoot DAO well).

But, no matter how well you train yourself to shoot DA well, you will shoot the same gun equipped as SA better. Given today's price of ammo, the low hit rate during gun fights, and the potential serious consequences of not hitting a shooting-worthy bad guy or hitting him with inadequate accuracy, why opt for a gun crippled by a suboptimal trigger? I can think of three reasons to shun a 1911 with a well tuned trigger -- a desire for high capacity, a desire for deep concealment, or cost.

If all you can shoot well with, is a light, SA trigger, then youre only doing yourself a disfavor, and limiting yourself.

How so, if all you own is handguns with nice SA triggers?

Learning to shoot DAO, will do more for your shooting overall than pretty much anything else, and that transfers to rifles and anything else, not just hand guns. Its not hard at all to learn, and what you gain pays dividends, and is is well worth the little effort it takes.

Jogging with ankle weights will make me a better runner, but come race time I'll remove the ankle weights. Regardless of any benefits one might accrue, one will still be more precise with a SA trigger, all else being the same.

If your position is true, think of how many gunsmiths are ripping off uninformed gun owners for the price of a worthless trigger job!

As far as a combat trigger, they are really no different than anything else, and in many cases, the light,"tuned" SA triggers can be a detriment, and even a danger, especially in the hands of someone who doesnt practice realistically, and is basing their skills on what they do target shooting. Those light, tuned target triggers, have no place on a serious use gun. Whats even scarier, is one in the hands of someone who carries one, and doesnt understand that.

I said nothing about a combat trigger. I said a SA trigger is more accurate (because of better precision) in combat. I believe the NRA limits triggers to no more than 4-lb for bullseye matches; Jeff Cooper thought a 3.5-lb trigger was just right for 1911 carry. I think a typical non-tuned 1911 trigger is 5-to-6-lb. A standard Glock trigger is 5.5-lb; isn't there a 3.5-lb optional accessory? If a safetiless Glock is supposedly safe enough to carry with a 3.5-to-5.5-lb trigger, why wouldn't a safety-equipped 1911 be safe to carry with a 3.5-to-6-lb trigger?

Seems to me the 1911 should be safer, and although there are more 1911s in the hands of Americans the most common gun we read ND reports about is the Glock. After all, if all one needs to do is "Keep yer booger hook off the bang switch," that makes all firearms, regardless of trigger, safe. Of course, an affirmative external safety or a long and heavy, precision-crippling, DA trigger provide an additional margin of safety in the event of an episode of brain flatulence.

Now, if you are talking a hair target trigger in the range of 1-to-2-lb, I'll agree that's too light to carry responsibly and unnecessary. I think it is safe to assume that assembly-line guns are sold with triggers that are not unsafely too light. It thus stands to reason that the triggers on most such guns can be improved while still allowing for safe handling.

I have a good buddy who fits that last part. His Nighthawks are something to marvel at, but their triggers are WAY to light and sensitive, and have no place on a gun like that if its being carried (which he does). I shoot with him a couple of times a year, and we both have doubles with them when shooting them "realistically". I usually settle down with them after a mag or two, but they are his guns and he still has them every time we shoot.

Please define "WAY too light and sensitive."

I assume "doubles" = troubles? If so, please describe the nature of such troubles.

He's a great guy, but I sometimes think he has more money than brains. He also has Pythons, and a couple of really nice S&W's, and he cant shoot them DA for crap either, which is how they are meant to be shot.

A crippling DA pull has lead to unfortunate lapses in safety in a misguided attempt to mitigate the poor (albeit more safe) nature of the trigger. Most notably is that many cops, and presumably civilians, were irresponsibly taught to stage their DA triggers, something that supposedly only ceased after Enoka published his study about a decade ago.

Like I said earlier, you are simply limiting yourself if SA is all you can shoot well with.

Like I said, I need an explanation for how this is so. My carry pistols are all safety-equipped DA/SA CZs, which I carry cocked and locked. I only fire them SA, as I do not believe in warning or fouling shots.

I have a laser target that I shoot mostly DA due primarily to sloth, but also as a challenge because in DA errors are magnified. However, my SA groups are usually half the diameter of my DA groups. Thus, my SA dry firing is typically 4-times more precise than my DA dry firing. I'm sure others would find similar results, either on a laser target or at the range, although I'm sure the SA improvement factor varies (but is always greater than 1).
 
Not all triggers are created equally. Two triggers on two guns of the same model can be substantially different. In fact, if all triggers were truly equal there would be no need to argue for having to learn to shoot a DAO well.
No, they are not all equal, but the difference between 99% of the factory triggers, isnt worth a second thought, and not an issue when you shoot the guns. Unless of course, you choose to make it one. They are simply, triggers.

You should learn to shoot DAO, if you arent already familiar with shooting that way, because its something youre not familiar with, not because its a chore. You simply learn a different trigger type. The big plus with learning the DAO trigger is, you learn that the trigger itself really isnt the big deal, something that those who dont understand, want to keep pushing. Its just a trigger, and nothing to worry over.

But, no matter how well you train yourself to shoot DA well, you will shoot the same gun equipped as SA better.
Not necessarily, and in some, if not most cases, not at all. I know this for a fact. Then again, I do shoot that way on a regular basis, and Im speaking from experience.

How so, if all you own is handguns with nice SA triggers?
Why? Again, you simply limit yourself and your skills, to one type of gun/trigger, and have limited yourself in options. What happens if you need to pick up something youre not familiar with, that doenst have your "crutch" trigger?

Jogging with ankle weights will make me a better runner, but come race time I'll remove the ankle weights. Regardless of any benefits one might accrue, one will still be more precise with a SA trigger, all else being the same.
Doesnt work like that. SA isnt necessarily more precise. DA/DAO isnt less precise. Its what you the shooter do, or cant do.

If your position is true, think of how many gunsmiths are ripping off uninformed gun owners for the price of a worthless trigger job!
They are! And those like you, here on the internet and in the gun shops, must be their best salesmen. Youre not doing anyone any favors by it either. ;)

I said nothing about a combat trigger.
"A well tuned SAO trigger is the best trigger for putting lead on target in combat..." That was you in post #18, was it not? Sounded to me like thats what you were inferring.

Seems to me the 1911 should be safer, and although there are more 1911s in the hands of Americans the most common gun we read ND reports about is the Glock.
Ive seen more problems with 1911's in this respect than I have Glocks, but Ive been around more 1911's over the years than I have Glocks. Between the two, I really dont see a difference safety wise, and Ive carried both pretty much any way you can think of, and never had any issues. If the operator is a dunce, youre going to have problems. Doesnt matter what the gun is.

Please define "WAY too light and sensitive."

I assume "doubles" = troubles? If so, please describe the nature of such troubles.
"Doubles" is "doubles", the gun fires twice, with the second round being unintentional. How long have you been at this?

"Way to light" triggers often give this result, especially if youre not accustomed to them.

A crippling DA pull has lead to unfortunate lapses in safety in a misguided attempt to mitigate the poor (albeit more safe) nature of the trigger.
As far as I know, the reason most departments went to DAO, and removed the SA notch of their revolvers, was to reduce their liability due to unintentional discharges under stress, of a gun in SA.

Most DA handguns dont have a "crippling" DA pull either (unless maybe youre that boy we used to see the bully pick on in the back of comics, when we were kids). Its just a trigger, that isnt the light SA that youre accustomed to. Nothing wrong with weight, as long as it reasonable and smooth, which most factory triggers are, even these days.

Like I said, I need an explanation for how this is so. My carry pistols are all safety-equipped DA/SA CZs, which I carry cocked and locked. I only fire them SA, as I do not believe in warning or fouling shots.
The more you keep talking, the more Im becoming convinced, you have little, if any real DA experience, or we wouldnt be hearing this from you.

Shooting DA, or DAO, is no harder than shooting SA, "if" youre accustomed to it. You'd understand that, if you bothered to give it a try and actually learn it.

Shooting DA/DAO puts your focus on the sights and/or target, where it should be, with little thought of the trigger. I dont think (consciously anyway) about the trigger at all when I shoot (unless there is something wrong with it). There is no need to, its just the trigger. If Im worried about what its doing, my focus is not in the right place.

I have a laser target that I shoot mostly DA due primarily to sloth, but also as a challenge because in DA errors are magnified. However, my SA groups are usually half the diameter of my DA groups. Thus, my SA dry firing is typically 4-times more precise than my DA dry firing. I'm sure others would find similar results, either on a laser target or at the range, although I'm sure the SA improvement factor varies (but is always greater than 1).
Try that with a heavy recoiling handgun shooting full power loads, and get back to me. Lasers and dry firing are great help, but no substitute for actual live fire, especially when it comes to dealing with things you dont get with the training aides.

As I said before, my groups shooting the heavy recoiling guns, shrank dramatically when shooting DAO, and it appears Im not the only one here to experience that. I also found my DAO revolver and auto shooting helped with everything else, especially the more I shot that way, and I also found I was way less trigger phobic and a trigger worrier, with pretty much everything else I shot/shoot.
 
I feel for you. MY wife complains about my lack of control of my "habit"-- bringing too many guns for each range session. I LIKE to use different guns( different characteristics.... a real challenge to become good with mor e than 1 gun). She would be happy with 1 or 2 per session. So we let her use what she wants--then she quits when tired. I continue to go through the bag of guns for that session-- how sad for me--LOL an addict left on the range with guns and ammo--oh the shame!!!

what amazes me is how great shooters(especially our veterans) can just pick up almost any gun and shoot it accurately--period. I cannot do that yet but it is my real goal--to shoot any gun the same way with great accuracy each time I handle it
 
This one ruined me. :(

TISAS1911_zps2f156e47.jpg
 
On the whole da vs sa debate going on, I can shoot a double action revolver just as accurate as a semi auto with a nice single action trigger when taking my time. The main reason I like semi auto single action is I can shoot it faster and more accurate when shooting fast.
 
Last edited:
On the whole da vs sa debate going on, I can shoot a double action revolver just as accurate as a nice single action trigger when taking my time. The main reason I like single action is I can shoot it faster and more accurate when shooting fast.


You're missing the point. People aren't saying don't carry a single action pistol or that it has no advantages. What we're saying is training with something harder has its advantages.
 
AK103K said:
A trigger is a trigger. The inferior part of the equation, is usually the shooter.

Triggerphobia seems to be a common thing these days, and you usually hear the complaints about other than SA triggers, from people who are inexperienced with anything but the SA triggers, and have never bothered to learn to shoot anything else (especially when you consider that it really only takes a little time and effort to learn to shoot DAO well).

What an absurd statement. Your over generalizations undermine any validity to the point you are trying to make. All poodles are dogs not all dogs are poodles. Some people like SA triggers more than DAO or DA/SA but that does not mean that they are inexperienced. It does not mean they are not proficient with other style triggers. Shooting a handgun well at speed is not the simple task you claim it to be. If it was you would see much tighter groups on everyone's targets at you local range. The reality is that it is not so easy. It in fact take a fair amount of time and effort to learn to shoot any platform well.

There are many different trigger designs which yield very different trigger pulls. There is a variance in trigger pulls from one gun to the next even within the same design from the same manufacturer coming off the same line. Running a DAO gun like a Kahr is different then running a gun like a Sig DA/SA gun, a 1911 or even a Glock. The concept of trigger control comes into play on every platform but it has to be tweaked in order to run a particular trigger. Each gun in order to get the best out of it has to be run slightly differently. You run a Glock differently then a 1911 not matter what the weight of the trigger pull is.

Learning to shoot DAO revolvers or long DAO triggers can help people master trigger control but at the same time it without proper instructions and correction it is also one of the biggest sources of bad habits I see on the range. No matter what the platform "perfect practice" makes perfect. Going out and slapping and yanking a DAO revolver trigger is not going to make you a better shooter no matter how many times you do it.

In the end shooting a handgun well is about trigger control. There are many ways to develop the necessary control and many of the principles that allow you to run on gun translate to other platforms and trigger types but not all triggers are the same. Most people even those who post here and are "gun enthusiast" do not shoot as much as we would like to or claim to do. Practice time and range time are precious so for most people it is best to practice with what you will use to defend yourself. Back to the fear the man with only one gun principle. Mastering all kinds of trigger is great if you are in the best of all worlds scenario but so few of use really truly live in that world so IMHO it is best to train with the platform you might have to use when it really counts.

That platform can change. It certainly changes for me. I have gone through times when I carried nothing but 1911s or BHPs. There was a time it was nothing but Sigs and CZs with DA/SA triggers. Now it is more of a mix but whatever I am carrying is always in the range bag and is always getting shot so if I have to use it my muscle memory is sharp. This IMHO is the most important thing YMMV.
 
Once upon a time, I was a pretty good shot with most of my guns. Then I bought a Colt 1911 45acp Government pistol and had a trigger job done to it. I am lights out shooting that sucker. Problem is, now, I can't shoot any of my other guns worth a hoot. While I was getting better and better with my 1911, I was getting worse with all my other guns.

I am thinking about putting my 1911 in the safe for a few months until improve with some of my other guns.

Anybody else ever had this problem?

Sorry for participating in the thread drift. ;)

If you are happy shooting the 1911 then keep shooting it and don't worry about it. If you don't carry it but carry something else just make sure that something else is always in the range bag when you head out. There is nothing wrong with shooting one platform better than another.
 
Some people like SA triggers more than DAO or DA/SA but that does not mean that they are inexperienced. It does not mean they are not proficient with other style triggers. Shooting a handgun well at speed is not the simple task you claim it to be. If it was you would see much tighter groups on everyone's targets at you local range. The reality is that it is not so easy. It in fact take a fair amount of time and effort to learn to shoot any platform well.
People may like one type over another, but when they tell you that the one they shoot well with is better than the one they dont, simply because they dont do well with it, or havent bothered to learn it, does make them inexperienced in that respect.

Just because "they" cant shoot a DA trigger, isnt the fault of anyone who can.

Shooting at speed is only as hard as you choose to make it. Yes it takes a little practice, just like anything else, but like anything else, if youre stuck at a basic level, everything above you seems hard, at least until you move on.

Stagnating at a basic level, and refusing to move on, and then complaining about it is a personal problem. Dont get testy, when those who do shoot at higher levels, point out its not that big a deal, if you bother to make the effort to progress.

What I see at most ranges is, there are a lot of people who really dont put much time and/or effort in, and their shooting reflects that. Nothing wrong with that, it just is what it is. Whats annoying is, to have someone who obviously stagnated at one level, tell you that theres no way that what youre suggesting, could ever be better than what they do, even though, they have never bothered to try. But again, that just is what it is.



In the end shooting a handgun well is about trigger control.
Do you think about the trigger when you shoot? Do you think about your grip, your breathing, your sights? What are you focused on when you shoot?

Other than the target, and sometimes the sights, I dont really think about any of that. Why? Because its all basic stuff. Stuff you shouldnt have to be thinking about. It should all be already ingrained into your brain and muscle memory.

If you practice on a regular basis, and practice the things that youre the weakest at the most, you will continue to improve, and to the point of no thought. No thought is where you want to be. If where you want to be, is with just one thing, and where you are then so be it. Just accept the fact, that thats just where "you" are, and others may have gone beyond, and seen there is more to learn, and have progressed.

The fact still is, if you can shoot a DA trigger well (and again, its really not a hard, or time consuming thing to learn, if you bother to try), you can shoot anything well.
 
Quote:
Not all triggers are created equally. Two triggers on two guns of the same model can be substantially different. In fact, if all triggers were truly equal there would be no need to argue for having to learn to shoot a DAO well.


No, they are not all equal, but the difference between 99% of the factory triggers, isnt worth a second thought, and not an issue when you shoot the guns. Unless of course, you choose to make it one. They are simply, triggers.

You fail to acknowledge in inherent contradiction in your assertion. If it takes practice to learn to shoot a DAO trigger well, it's because a DAO trigger is harder to shoot well.

You should learn to shoot DAO, if you arent already familiar with shooting that way, because its something youre not familiar with, not because its a chore. You simply learn a different trigger type. The big plus with learning the DAO trigger is, you learn that the trigger itself really isnt the big deal, something that those who dont understand, want to keep pushing. Its just a trigger, and nothing to worry over.

You fail to give a reason for why I should learn to shoot DAO. If I owned or used a DAO I'd agree with you, but I don't.

Quote:
But, no matter how well you train yourself to shoot DA well, you will shoot the same gun equipped as SA better.


Not necessarily, and in some, if not most cases, not at all. I know this for a fact. Then again, I do shoot that way on a regular basis, and Im speaking from experience.

I look forward to hearing the experimental design and statistical analysis you used and the data you generated to know for a fact that a DA trigger is just as good in terms of precision as a SA trigger.

Quote:
How so, if all you own is handguns with nice SA triggers?


Why? Again, you simply limit yourself and your skills, to one type of gun/trigger, and have limited yourself in options. What happens if you need to pick up something youre not familiar with, that doenst have your "crutch" trigger?

I see no way that I have suffered in anyway by practicing with only my firearms. In fact, it seems advantageous to avoid wasting time and resources throwing ammo downrange with firearms I don't use, own, or intend to use or own.

As to the scenario you offer, it is extremely unlikely to occur. Logic dictates that one's limited time and resources are best devoted to scenarios that are nearly infinitely more likely, such as the need to employ a DGU when carrying one's firearm or when at home with one's firearm. The potential for confusion and skill degradation and resource squandering that accompanies a mongrel practice regimen seems to me not worth the irrelevant points that might be picked up.

Quote:
Jogging with ankle weights will make me a better runner, but come race time I'll remove the ankle weights. Regardless of any benefits one might accrue, one will still be more precise with a SA trigger, all else being the same.


Doesnt work like that. SA isnt necessarily more precise. DA/DAO isnt less precise. Its what you the shooter do, or cant do.

Are you seriously arguing that the gun makes no difference? Judging by what the pros in the various handgun shooting sports use there is no way you can win that argument. I've shot enough different guns over the decades to know the gun and in particular the trigger can be a critical difference.

Quote:
If your position is true, think of how many gunsmiths are ripping off uninformed gun owners for the price of a worthless trigger job!


They are! And those like you, here on the internet and in the gun shops, must be their best salesmen. Youre not doing anyone any favors by it either.

I've never had a trigger job done or performed one myself. I just buy affordable good guns with decently designed triggers.

Quote:
I said nothing about a combat trigger.


"A well tuned SAO trigger is the best trigger for putting lead on target in combat..." That was you in post #18, was it not? Sounded to me like thats what you were inferring.

Nice job of selective quoting, o slayer of strawmen. I say again, I said nothing about a combat trigger. I said a SA trigger is more accurate (because of better precision) in combat.

I have no idea what a combat trigger is.

Quote:
Seems to me the 1911 should be safer, and although there are more 1911s in the hands of Americans the most common gun we read ND reports about is the Glock.


Ive seen more problems with 1911's in this respect than I have Glocks, but Ive been around more 1911's over the years than I have Glocks. Between the two, I really dont see a difference safety wise, and Ive carried both pretty much any way you can think of, and never had any issues. If the operator is a dunce, youre going to have problems. Doesnt matter what the gun is.

Yet, the odds are any recent news story about an ND will involve a Glock, just as the FBI purportedly predicted in the 1980s.

Quote:
Please define "WAY too light and sensitive."

I assume "doubles" = troubles? If so, please describe the nature of such troubles.


"Doubles" is "doubles", the gun fires twice, with the second round being unintentional. How long have you been at this?

"Way to light" triggers often give this result, especially if youre not accustomed to them.

I've been shooting for 54 years.

I assume any trigger that fires twice with but one intentional pull of the trigger has a trigger that is too light or a reset that is too short.

Quote:
A crippling DA pull has lead to unfortunate lapses in safety in a misguided attempt to mitigate the poor (albeit more safe) nature of the trigger.


As far as I know, the reason most departments went to DAO, and removed the SA notch of their revolvers, was to reduce their liability due to unintentional discharges under stress, of a gun in SA.

That is my understanding, too. I also understand that many of those PDs were irresponsibly training their LEOs to stage their DA triggers. If so, staging a trigger placed in SA mode is a recipe for disaster.

Most DA handguns dont have a "crippling" DA pull either (unless maybe youre that boy we used to see the bully pick on in the back of comics, when we were kids). Its just a trigger, that isnt the light SA that youre accustomed to. Nothing wrong with weight, as long as it reasonable and smooth, which most factory triggers are, even these days.

My new CZs have DA pulls on the order of 12 lb if my recollection is any good. My well used milsurp CZ 82 has a DA pull that is far lighter than that. However, the SA pulls on all four are, as I recall, about 4 to 5 lb and are much shorter. It's not a matter of machoness. It's a matter of a lightweight weapon being far less well supported than a rifle is subject to being pulled off target during the trigger pull, and a long and heavy DA trigger pull will almost certainly be subject to bigger pull-induced deviations than a shorter and lighter SA trigger pull.

Take your favorite DA/SA handgun, shoot 30 targets, 10 rounds at each target, all shots in DA; then, do the same with 30 targets, all shots in SA. Record the group precision for each target, then conduct a t-test to determine if the SA precision is better than the DA precision.

Quote:
Like I said, I need an explanation for how this is so. My carry pistols are all safety-equipped DA/SA CZs, which I carry cocked and locked. I only fire them SA, as I do not believe in warning or fouling shots.


The more you keep talking, the more Im becoming convinced, you have little, if any real DA experience, or we wouldnt be hearing this from you.

I can't recall ever firing a handgun in DA. My DA experience is limited to dry firing, and my laser target tells me my SA groups are 4-times more precise than my DA groups, despite the fact that most of my dry firing is in DA, because I'm often too lazy to cock the hammer for each shot.

My manhood is not threatened because I've chosen to buy and use handguns that I can use solely in SA, and my experience has shown me, clearly enough that I need no statistics, that DA shots are substantially less precise. The entire point of having a handgun for self defense is to hit what you aim at.

Shooting DA, or DAO, is no harder than shooting SA, "if" youre accustomed to it. You'd understand that, if you bothered to give it a try and actually learn it.

But, I am accustomed to my DA triggers, and experience has shown me they are clearly degraded relative to using the SA mode.

Shooting DA/DAO puts your focus on the sights and/or target, where it should be, with little thought of the trigger. I dont think (consciously anyway) about the trigger at all when I shoot (unless there is something wrong with it). There is no need to, its just the trigger. If Im worried about what its doing, my focus is not in the right place.

You've already admitted the obvious, that not all triggers are equal, so don't try to resurrect that dead horse. Are you really going to argue that using a SA trigger somehow diverts your attention from your front sight? How, pray tell, does a DA trigger magically draw your eyes to your front sight. By the way, keep your focus on your front sight, not your target.

Quote:
I have a laser target that I shoot mostly DA due primarily to sloth, but also as a challenge because in DA errors are magnified. However, my SA groups are usually half the diameter of my DA groups. Thus, my SA dry firing is typically 4-times more precise than my DA dry firing. I'm sure others would find similar results, either on a laser target or at the range, although I'm sure the SA improvement factor varies (but is always greater than 1).


Try that with a heavy recoiling handgun shooting full power loads, and get back to me. Lasers and dry firing are great help, but no substitute for actual live fire, especially when it comes to dealing with things you dont get with the training aides.

I don't own a heavy recoiling handgun. Long before the FBI figured it out last year, I knew that low recoiling handguns are more precise, and a handgun with poor precision is just a noisemaker.

You'll have to provide me with a plausible reason why live-fire precision, DA vs SA, should be any different than dry-fire precision. Please explain the physics or magic behind recoil improving a DA trigger while degrading a SA trigger.

As I said before, my groups shooting the heavy recoiling guns, shrank dramatically when shooting DAO, and it appears Im not the only one here to experience that. I also found my DAO revolver and auto shooting helped with everything else, especially the more I shot that way, and I also found I was way less trigger phobic and a trigger worrier, with pretty much everything else I shot/shoot.

I overcame any triggerphobia, if any, before the age of 10.

As I recall, you own some 1911s. Which one is your favorite shooter?
 
It's one of the reasons I bring different guns with me to the range. An example would be a 1911, a S&W 5904 and G19. I can go from one to the other without any problems because I've been doing it for so long. If I only shot 1911s for a year all of my DA/SA or DAO handgun trigger pulls would feel heavy and awkward.
 
You fail to acknowledge in inherent contradiction in your assertion. If it takes practice to learn to shoot a DAO trigger well, it's because a DAO trigger is harder to shoot well.
There is no contradiction, just the difference in trigger types. One is no harder to learn than the other, you just learn them. One is no harder to shoot well with than the other.

Lets just stop, shall we. You obviously dont want to bother with anything other than SA, and if its all you shoot well, and youre happy in your spot, fine with me, so we'll leave it at that. Just do me a favor, accept the fact that some of us have no troubles shooting well with the other trigger types as well, and leave it at that. That way we can stop with the blow by blows.

It's one of the reasons I bring different guns with me to the range. An example would be a 1911, a S&W 5904 and G19. I can go from one to the other without any problems because I've been doing it for so long. If I only shot 1911s for a year all of my DA/SA or DAO handgun trigger pulls would feel heavy and awkward.
Sums it up nicely.
 
I don't shoot anything DA. Why? because I pretty much suck at it and don't really care to learn. I've been shooting SA's for 48 years, ever since I was 10. What few times I tried it I usually hit or came close to what I was shooting at but not nearly as well as I do SA. I have a couple of DA revolvers but I never shoot them that way and rarely shoot them at all. I much prefer SA revolvers and 1911's. I did buy a Glock once and for DA the trigger was nice and smooth for the entire travel but it was like walking around the block instead of driving. I got rid of it post haste and won't have another DA.
 
I can shoot a double action revolver just as accurate as a nice single action trigger when taking my time.

I sincerely doubt that. I'd have to see replicate comparative targets to be convinced otherwise.

The main reason I like single action is I can shoot it faster and more accurate when shooting fast.

Another way of acknowledging that the SA trigger provides more precise results.
 
I don't shoot anything DA. Why? because I pretty much suck at it and don't really care to learn.
You suck at it because you dont care to learn, so why complain? Like anything else, it takes a little getting used to, but it pays dividends in the end.


The main reason I like single action is I can shoot it faster and more accurate when shooting fast.
If you can shoot fast and accurate in SA, then you'd be lightning fast and accurate in DA. I seriously doubt, you could beat a DAO shooter shooting SA.

I sincerely doubt that. I'd have to see replicate comparative targets to be convinced otherwise.
Then you need to get out more.

Another way of acknowledging that the SA trigger provides more precise results.
Youre only taking the word of those who like you, dont like DA, which proves nothing. You dont have to take my word for it either, all you have to do is watch Jerry Miculek shoot, and others who shoot DAO, to see what they can do and how well they can shoot. You dont see them thumb cocking DA guns, they shoot them in the manner they were meant to be shot, and they do so accurately.

Miculek shoots a 1911 very well too, but he doesnt beat the speed record with it, so think about that. The reason being, you cant shoot an auto loader as fast as a revolver, SA or not.

Perhaps instead of fighting it so hard, you should expand your horizons, and learn something new, and then get back to us and we can talk about it again when you see the light. And Ill guarantee you, if you take a little time, and make the effort, you WILL see the light, just like John Belushi did in church in the Blues Brothers. :D ;)
 
Many, many years ago, my first handgun was a cheap HR 929 revolver.
I could not hit anything with it even at 5 yards. I thought I sucked.
One day, I happened by a shop in San Rafael where the Beemans sold air pistols. On their wall, they had targets showing one shot groups from 33 feet.
I was so impressed, I decided to be able to do this.

My first real gun was a High Standard Supermatic Trophy with a clean single action trigger break. Wow, I found I could shoot! Thus began my schooling in the world of NRA bullseye. The old school one handed military style of shooting. Where a single action clean as glass trigger break is everything.
For years, I would not consider any gun that did not have the cleanest single action trigger.
When you get spoiled with a Bob Chow 1911, or a Smith model 52, it's hard to go to anything else! But I am happy with choosing this road, because the principles of shooting that I learned here apply everywhere else in the shooting sports.

People that learn how to shoot two handed have a very hard time going to or wanting to learn to shoot one handed. Unfortunately, bullseye competition seems to be losing any popularity, and the action shooting sports is the rage. So the old school mastery of the trigger is also changing.

When I got into the world of tactical shooting (for the lack of a better description), I had to relearn much of what I learned from the world of bullseye competition. I could shoot one handed better than two, but had to transition myself to learning what was more practical.

And to add to this thread, I had to learn the world of double action shooting.
It's a whole different world learning to shoot a four inch group at 50 yards one handed than to shooting at plates at seven yards in a few seconds with a double action revolver.

I now love double action as much as I did my clean break single actions.
I would never want those light triggers for the SD world. So what might be a good trigger for range fun is totally different than what would be a good trigger for your concealed carry. But you should be good enough that no matter what the trigger you can hit what you are aiming at. That is where the principles of good trigger control never changes, regardless of the trigger platform!

And as Brian Zins (Holder of many National Bullseye shooting records) said on the TV show, TOP SHOT,
as long as it has a trigger, I'm good to go.
Now that's the right attitude!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top