If you don't know whether that is ethical or not then that is really sad. You can call me whatever but two wrongs don't make a right and getting in the mud with your opponent makes you just as dirty.
I wonder how the Cold War would've turned out if we applied this kind of thinking to that struggle.
"Yeah, the KGB is stealing secrets from Los Alamos and they'll have the atomic bomb 15 years or so before they could've developed it on their own...but we aren't going to dirty our hands by spying on
them."
Or World War Two? Spy on the Nazis? Heck no. Disband the OSS right now. We can't lower ourselves to their level.
Of course, the Soviet Union and the Nazis were existential threats to our liberties from the
outside.
I guess that makes it different. The Brady Campaign has offices located right here in America, so their attempts to eradicate one of my God-given rights can be excused. See, they're an "in house" problem.
And who cares if groups like the Brady Campaign have used lies and media manipulation for decades? Falsified statistics? Knowingly so? That shouldn't make a difference, right?
You know, if our opponents only used facts and logical debate rather than distortions and emotional rants...I might
actually feel guilty about this stuff. I might be embarassed. But I cannot be embarassed by having a mole inside Joseph Goebbels' office.
Could somebody explain to me why we are required to be tolerant of people who advocate zero tolerance for my freedoms? I can tolerate just about anything
but intolerance.