Wait a sec, you're implying that a well organized band of mexican's has taken over california and is eyeing the rest of country.
Why do the defenders of the Invaders always redefine what has been said? Oh, yes, as I said above, if not they'd have no position.
Nobody said they were well organized. Even now they are only semi-organized. Wasn't even implied, in fact. But they DO have massive numnbers and with numbers comes influence, by intimidation if nothing else.
But more ammo, we're at war...etc etc etc. Sure, that's not hatemongering,
You buy ammo to protect your home. Is that hate mongering when the guy that finally does come thru your window happens to be black? Or does it REMAIN having prepared for a possible eventuality. The answer is obvious.
that simply advocating the purchase of ammunition with the prospect of violence against a largly nonviolent people.
Depends. If your non-violent people remain non-violent, especially when we enforce our laws against those among them who have violated them, then you have no point. OTOH, if those people become violent, and they are unarguably showing the signs of such a potentiality, then you STILL have no point.
If something needs to be hated or dealth with in a nearviolent manner, is it not our dealing with our leaders?
No reason to hate them, either, yet. Simply replace them with people who will enforce the law and thus remove the current swarm of Illegals and limit the number of new ones as much as possible. Meanwhile, it would be nice if some of you would actually focus on the problem and stop trying to derail things by throwing in non-issues like your fixation on race and motivation.
The Illegals are criminals and we want the laws enforced and we are prepared to take care of ourselves if such enforcement results in violence on THEIR part. That defines the argument. If you leave that confine then you are off topic. Wrap your minds around it.
