Picking one handgun to address every contingency the present and future might pose (including but not limited to parts availability, ammunition availability and cost, reliability/durability, self-defense-either in the context of ccw and/or home defense duties, wilderness survival, hunting-both big game and varmints and target/plinking chores) will necessitate a choice that will be severely compromised in one or more of the envisioned tasks it would be expected to perform but will still suffice in every one of them.
With those considerations in mind, my choice would be my Smith & Wesson Model 686 Plus revolver with the 4" barrel. Small enough to carry concealed; big enough to hunt deer-sized game; chambered in a caliber that ranges from target wadcutters to full-house Magnums; a seven-shot capacity; easily reloadable; reliable as the sun rising in the east; a stainless steel finish to combat the elements; adjustable and easily seen sights for target shooting or to accomodate different loads to correspond with changing points of impact/point of aim and a handgun most would agree would serve you well in a gunfight.
Though I opted for a revolver chambered in .357 Magnum, it was a hard choice between it and a handgun chambered in .22rf. But although the .22 rimfire offers advantages no other round approaches (economical shooting, ammunition availability, high magazine/cylinder capacity; minimal noise and recoil and compactness-fifty rounds can easiy be held in one hand), I could not ignore its ever present and undeniable Achilles' heel: limited power/range.
With those considerations in mind, my choice would be my Smith & Wesson Model 686 Plus revolver with the 4" barrel. Small enough to carry concealed; big enough to hunt deer-sized game; chambered in a caliber that ranges from target wadcutters to full-house Magnums; a seven-shot capacity; easily reloadable; reliable as the sun rising in the east; a stainless steel finish to combat the elements; adjustable and easily seen sights for target shooting or to accomodate different loads to correspond with changing points of impact/point of aim and a handgun most would agree would serve you well in a gunfight.
Though I opted for a revolver chambered in .357 Magnum, it was a hard choice between it and a handgun chambered in .22rf. But although the .22 rimfire offers advantages no other round approaches (economical shooting, ammunition availability, high magazine/cylinder capacity; minimal noise and recoil and compactness-fifty rounds can easiy be held in one hand), I could not ignore its ever present and undeniable Achilles' heel: limited power/range.