FireForged
New member
that is a very reasonable way to state it.
and the "bad guy" with a 5x hole in him just might kill you.
If you are talking about the context of a game and game play, I agree. If the point is to develop self defense skills, I would say that context is important and without property context, which includes correct strategics, its not really training. Although I concede that it is training for more competition which mimics self defense situations in a nuancical way.
It's going to be training against a human opponent(s) armed with simunitions, air-soft, paintball-type weapons, role-playing as the aggressor or the defender, who's got a plan, tactics, and is seeking an end-result, just like you.
Quote:It's going to be training against a human opponent(s) armed with simunitions, air-soft, paintball-type weapons, role-playing as the aggressor or the defender, who's got a plan, tactics, and is seeking an end-result, just like you.
And do they have this training at least once a week? I find at least one IDPA USPSA competition a week, not to mention practicing for such.
Who exactly is your target market for all this?
Clearing rooms etc. are not advised for the average homeowner.
Clearing rooms etc. are not advised for the average homeowner.
Clearing rooms etc. are not advised for the average homeowner WITHOUT proper training.
Legally the available scenarios I can lawfully use lethal force are severely restricted, and with good reason. That reduces down to a few scenarios-most of which come down to doing other protective actions than self defense (leaving the area etc.).
regardless of what a person wants to do, is able to do or expects to do.. the situation you find yourself in may demand that you do something else. If remaining static is a realistic option then its reasonable to assume that moving might also be a realistic option. I do not see the logic in narrowly focusing on only one method. If we were talking about 26 options, ok, I get it... but we are only talking about 2. I cant help but think that some people simply construct an argument based on what they want to do and not want is practical or prudent.
I have no intent to roam around my home looking for an intruder. I do accept the fact that I may not be able to remain static for a whole host of reasons. Maybe they set something on fire, maybe my wife ran out of the room and is in danger, maybe my wife got up in the middle of the night and came upon an intruder and cant make it back to me. There are countless reasons I might have to move during a violent encounter. I would prefer to know how to do that while optimizing my chances of success.
__________________