Gallup poll: 53% of The Sheeple ready to vote for Frau Hillary

andrewtb: again i agree with what you say.

silent trigger: who are you calling a condom leak degenerate? usually when people throw out the ignorant rhetoric you do most people dont listen. You make everyone in this post look bad by generalizing and then putting people who you dont know down. Why are we only getting that from one side?
 
Silent Trigger, is there such a thing as a "reputable militia branch"? I don't think so ...

Yes. Every man between the ages of 18, and 55 who own a firearm, and believe in the US, and uphold the constitution against all enemies foriegn, and Domestic. Now if you want to know if there is an organized one, I doubt it. Simply because any that would be reputable, would be infiltrated by the Feds, and labeled part of the Arian Nation, Radicals, or Nut Cases. This story would be picked up, and plugged by the infotainment media. No doubt helped along by the government leaks.
 
So, Silent Trigger, I didn't learn to shoot until I was 16. I have no desire to hunt anything except clays. I don't own one piece of camo. I'm against the Iraq war (but not the soldiers, there is a difference). I have several former-hippies as friends.

Now I ask you, which am I? Condom leak degenerate, or metrosexual?
 
Jeez guys! :eek:

For those I obviously offended and don't know me too well and for what it's worth I apologize, but not for how I feel about things, but rather because as usual I get misconstrued. What can I say, in business terms (a college buddy of mine gave me the label) I'm a HIGH CONTEXT individual living in what apparently is a "Low Context" culture... according to him anyhow, meaning that we're a culture who want's things NOW. I'm thinking on multiple levels at once therefore there is much volume to what I say or how I come across.

And I'm not labeling anyone in here personally as a "Condom Leak Degenerate" but you have to (well you don't but try to) appreciate the levels of faggotry (and I don't mean in a homosexual way either) I've had to grow up around with others. Being that I'm a high context individual as well as one who can get heated (not angry, just heated) I tend to piss people off, but that's a small thing considering how guys like me who obey the laws, mind my own business but am Patriotic of an "Old Guard" mindset get demonized left and right. As long as I keep my mouth shut, speak in a PC minded way, then everything is 100% Copasetic.

Well after I hit age 15 I said screw all that and started telling my peers what I thought about them, or at least stating my observations of the situation overall before us all. There's simply no excuse for anyone in this nation to not know their dang rights or have understanding of what the nation was founded upon nor what it stands for. When I would refer to some people in the past (and again no one in here) as Condom Leaks, it's just frustration coming out is all. Because I had to grow up around people who either were told they were stupid and they believed it, or they were supposedly far more "with it", but you'd never know it. But then again I was the guy in Senior Highschool who on day 1 - 5 would actually read and memorize the whole student handbook to know my rights, what was written law for that respective institution of processing (cause it sure as Hell ain't about education), and where their could be loop holes because it wasn't cannon if it wasn't written. You know what most jerk offs did? They screwed around, never took anything seriously, and most I've seen still don't, and cry like babies over topics they'll never have any understanding of what there is to understand because they're oblivious to it all.

THEN, when the SHTF (the senior high example), I'm the guy who'd tick off people because I seemd to be made of Teflon, and the Principals were mad because I actually knew my rights. Things like eating lunch on the football field was a no no right? They wanted me for truancy only by the (then) handbook definition of "Truancy" one could only be so if they were off campus or away from a Curriculum/Class. Lunch wasn't part of any cirriculum and though it was understood you either ate in the lunch room or court yard, it was never written as law that you had to stay there. Thus in wanting to be away from most of the collective majority of self induced "blahs" I went to the football feild. They couldn't do squat to me because I didn't beak any rules, I was within my right.

Now while that's a crude and albeit rather juvenile example of what I'm talking about, it has everything to do with where we are today. If what I said doesn't apply to you, then why would any be offended? Like I said I'm not trying to flame and I've never (nor will I) attacked anyone in particular about something. I just state my beliefs and views no different than the next is all, and usually someone who grew up soft just gets the feathers ruffled. Thus I guess the name calling might be out of line, but it wasn't directed at anyone here, so I don't see the issue at hand or how that would knock down anything I had to say from the next person.

And to answer the question about militias, as far as I know there aren't any active ones that get good press, but that's because of jocko boy dumb asses like McVeigh (with some added socialist media spin no less) demonized anyone who would be affiliated with one, thus making even the law abiding and non felony holding citizien a little scared to excersize what is their Constitutional right to formation. Having a heated opinion about something doesn't make one automatically a bad person. If that were the case most would be in jail for venting after a hard days work. And for any of you who might be confused on the issue (I doubt it though) the National Guard isn't the militia. If one is drawing a paycheck from the Federal Government, trained, equipped and deployed by them outside of the "Reserves" or Active Military then it's an auxillary force, not a militia. A militia is a formation of American citizens from all ethnic background, creed, etcetera who excersize their constitutional right to form, train and are SOC (Special Operations Capable) to be first responders to a crisis within US borders, properly deputized by the respective county Sheriff within a multitude of "operations" as needed. They are also the last line of defense against enemies both foreign and domestic.

However, with all of the bad press they get, those who haven't done anything wrong, simply don't bother and the idiots out there continue to do things to make people (especially the bleeding heart left) misconstrue the whole formation & overall process. Need has nothing to do with it and it has everything to do with a citizen's RIGHT, extended no less from the 2nd Amendment clause, which shall not be infringed upon, but tell that to the lame ducks in society or the flip floppers who one minute are one way and the next side with someone else. THAT more than anything else is just gutless.

As to Lord Nikon, I don't know you so how can I make an ultimate judgement? And why would I want to? I merely stated my observations on things and how I feel ultimately betrayed by people who on one hand say (no one in here, in general) they understand things but show no evidence of this when it comes to GOD, Country and Mom's Home Cooked meals. If I offended you or anyone else then hey, for what it's worth and if you'll accept my apology... "I'm sorry." But I won't apologize for how I feel. Perhaps you and others feel differently for however you came up. And since I've never walked a mile in your boots, I stand corrected and will shut up on that note. And there's nothing wrong with not hunting, I don't get to do much of it myself anymore sadly.
 
Last edited:
mvpel said:
The typical Democrat attitude towards guns is symptomatic of their entire worldview, and it's no accident. It stems from the philosophical difference between self-reliance vs. reliance on government.

+ 1 million
 
The Republicans should hope the Democrats nominate Hillary. She is clearly the most beatable candidate available. Give her a little time to start espousing her ideas and she'll lose in a landslide.

Unlike her husband, she comes from the far left edge of the Democratic party, and the extremes rarely get elected.

Bob
 
Silent Trigger:

"Low context" means you rely mostly on specific verbal aspects of communication in order to communicate. (USA, Western Europe)

"High context" refers to countries such as Japan, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, where much of communication occurs via nonverbal cues such as body language and movements. If you claim to be high-context, it means that you communicate most effectively interpersonally using close body contact and signalling. :)

Your "business buddy" should have took some communication in college. :D

I'm actually all for Condi Rice rather than Hitlery; then we can have both our first black AND woman president, all in one package!
 
Silent Trigger,
If you can please keep your post shorter :D . I have ADD and cant stay still long enough to read through a whole entire posting of yours :).

Some people may not like my political views seeing as how they are somewhat mixed. I am a registered democrat but will always vote for the lesser of two evils. I wont judge someone on skin color or looks even though as I said both Hillary and Condi are ugly as heck.

What does piss me off is how right away everyone my age is labeled. There are a few of us that are just as mature as what most would consider old farts. We may be young at heart and in personality but have a very good idea of what right and wrong is.
 
When it comes to politics I am all and none, just want to make that clear and if someone does not understand what I mean...just let me know, maybe I can explain a bit more clear :rolleyes:
Those of you who seem to be so very educated I must say " knowledge and education comes from within not from without".

I would not die for neither one of my countries or any other country whatsoever, they don't deserve anyone's death right now, it is all a shame that instead of being more civilized the world is turning more uncivilized.
However, I would die and fight for my loved ones including friends and of course my dogs and turtles which had proven to be far more civilized than any human being.

My big appologies for my bad puctuation and maybe missespelling, etc. to those highly educated ones, if you want it perfect you can correct it yourself.
I only speak a few languages and kind of gets tangled up inside there :rolleyes:

Maybe it is a woman in power what this country needs... yes, woman!! we may not have balls but we can deliver them :D
That "does not mean" I will vote for Hillary and I sure will not vote for condoleza.

SON !! are you calling me an old fart? I think I need to go grab my high heel shoe...
 
..maybe true..but I would like to see how the question was worded....polls are not always what the simple headlines mean...polls are used to build strength on someone's idea...like lets elect Hillary...why do some people say she's brilliant...what evidence is there to confirm this?????..a news article???..a woman president is what this country needs...??...what argument is there to pursuade me to believe this....actually this would a terrible time to experiment politically..too much chaos in the world right now...
 
aspen,
I forgot this is a macho's country, right?


How many woman leaded other countries and did a great job?
Another thing I may need to add...
If a leader can not control or direct their own children in their own home how can they control or direct a whole country?
A woman in power would not be an experiment but a vaccination to many.
 
How many woman leaded other countries and did a great job?
SZ200_thatcher.jpg

Margaret Thatcher did an outstanding job.

I think Dr. Rice is of the same caliber.
 
Golda Meir

Indira Gandhi

And England had several great Queens, including the present one.

And Eleanor Roosevelt did great things without being elected.

And Hillary does not qualify to be among the above. But she's the best candidate the Republicans can hope for. She's imminently beatable.

Now, if only the Republicans can come up with something better than the last one.

Bob
 
Back
Top